ACE ALN 300 VS Hyundai HL930I Wheel Loader

Price Available Soon^*

ACE ALN 300

Engine

Cummins 123 HP
Bucket

1.7 m³
Weight

9970 kg
Fwd. Speed

40 km/h
Dump Height

NA
Tripping Load

NA

Small (8-15 Ton)

₹ 48-50 Lakhs^*

Hyundai HL930I

Engine

Weichai 130 HP
Bucket

1.7 - 3.0 m³
Weight

10600 kg
Fwd. Speed

39 km/h
Dump Height

2905 mm
Tripping Load

NA

Small (8-15 Ton)

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before macking any final decision.

Key Highlights	ACE ALN 300	Hyundai HL930I

ACE ALN 300 VS Hyundai HL930I Wheel Loader

ACE ALN 300

Price Available Soon

Hyundai HL930I

₹ 48-50 Lakhs

Particulars	ACE ALN 300	Hyundai HL930I

Overview Summary

Comparing the ACE ALN 300 and Hyundai HL930I Wheel Loaders, both machines are designed with the Indian construction landscape in mind, boasting high torque, respectable power outputs, and standard AC cabins for operator comfort. The ACE ALN 300 brings a six-cylinder Cummins engine to the table, while the Hyundai HL930I pairs a slightly more powerful engine with advanced features like a Load-Sensing Hydraulic System and GPS standard.

ACE ALN 300 Wheel Loader

Pros:

Engine model Cummins 123 HP provides robust performance
High maximum torque of 540 Nm at lower rpm indicates good low-end power
Piston displacement of 5.39 L and six cylinders suggest a durable and strong engine
Top forward speed of 40 km/h is suitable for quick job site operations
Standard AC cabin adds to operator comfort during long working hours

Cons:

Lack of information on overall dimensions might make it difficult to assess machine suitability for certain sites
Transmission type not clearly specified beyond Power Shift & Constant Mesh
Operating weight of 9970 kg may limit maneuverability in tight spaces
Some detailed technical specifications like Max. Dump Angle and Max. Breakout Force are missing

Hyundai HL930I Wheel Loader

Pros:

More powerful engine with 130 HP at slightly higher rpm
CEV-IV Emission certified showing a commitment to environmental standards
Load-Sensing Hydraulic System may offer more efficient operations
Higher system pressure at 190 bar could imply better hydraulic performance
GPS as standard provides enhanced fleet management capabilities

Cons:

Lower torque peak rpm range could mean less immediate power compared to ACE ALN 300
Slightly reduced maximum pump flow rate of 176 L/min may affect hydraulic performance
Four cylinders in the engine might not be as durable as a six-cylinder configuration
The maximum forward speed of 39 km/h is marginally less than the ACE ALN 300

Closing Recommendation

The best choice will depend on the specific needs of the job and operator preferences. If durability and low-end torque are of the utmost importance, the ACE ALN 300 might be the right pick. However, if higher engine power, environmental considerations, and enhanced technology features play a bigger role in decision-making, one might favor the Hyundai HL930I.