Komatsu PC71 VS XCMG XE80C Pro Excavator

₹ 24-26 Lakhs^*

Komatsu PC71

Weight

7050 Kg
Bucket

0.09 - 0.35 m³
Dig. Depth

4100 mm
Engine

KOEL 60 HP
Warranty

1 Yr. / 3000 hr.
Boom

3710 mm

Small (6-15 Ton)

₹ 33- 36 Lakhs^*

XCMG XE80C Pro

Weight

7700 kg
Bucket

0.35 m³
Dig. Depth

4020 mm
Engine

Kubota 57.6 HP
Warranty

1 Yr. / 2500 hr.
Boom

3720 mm

Small (6-15 Ton)

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before macking any final decision.

Key Highlights	Komatsu PC71	XCMG XE80C Pro

Komatsu PC71 VS XCMG XE80C Pro Excavator

Komatsu PC71

₹ 24-26 Lakhs

XCMG XE80C Pro

₹ 33- 36 Lakhs

Particulars	Komatsu PC71	XCMG XE80C Pro

Overview Summary

The XCMG XE80C Pro stands out with its higher engine power, greater bucket digging force, and larger fuel tank, implying longer operating times and more strength in excavation. It also boasts of better gradeability and has a sturdier design. In contrast, Komatsu PC71 offers a higher ground bearing pressure, slightly faster swing speed, and an extended warranty, suggesting it may be better for precision work and has a design ideal for compact spaces.

XCMG XE80C Pro

Pros:

Higher engine power of 57.6 HP for robust performance
Larger fuel tank capacity at 170 liters for longer operation
Greater bucket digging force of 57 kN for tougher tasks
Better gradeability at 35° allows for operation on steeper inclines
Higher operating weight of 7700 kg indicates a sturdier and possibly more durable machine
Increased maximum digging depth of 4020 mm for deeper excavation
Higher maximum dump height at 5160 mm improves clearance during material handling

Cons:

Lower travel speeds with a high of 5.4 Km/h compared to Komatsu's 3.5 Km/h, which can be limiting in certain scenarios
No specified ground bearing pressure which could be useful for determining surface suitability
Slightly less efficient hydraulic system with main pump flow of 163.8 L/min compared to 155 L/min of Komatsu PC71

Komatsu PC71

Pros:

Engine features a bigger displacement of 4.16 L potentially offering more durability
Higher ground bearing pressure rating at 33.2 kPa may imply better weight distribution
Slightly higher swing speed at 12 rpm can lead to faster cycle times during operations
Longer warranty period of 1 year or 3000 hours can provide more peace of mind
A more compact design with an overall height of cab at 1810 mm which could be beneficial in low clearance areas
Undercarriage is longer at 2765 mm, potentially offering better stability

Cons:

Lower engine power at 60 HP when compared to XCMG's 57.6 HP is a minor disadvantage
Smaller fuel tank capacity of 130 liters could lead to more frequent refueling stops
Lesser bucket digging force at 47.1 kN might hinder performance in tough conditions
Travel speeds are lower which may affect the efficiency of the machine in transit
Arm digging force is also lower at 35.3 kN, which can affect the ability to handle heavy-duty tasks

Closing Recommendation

If longevity, greater digging capabilities, and extended work hours are crucial, the XCMG XE80C Pro is the better choice. If you prioritize machine stability, compact design for tighter spaces, and a longer warranty, then the Komatsu PC71 may be more suitable for your needs.