XCMG XE80C VS Sany SY80C-9 PRO Excavator

desi-machines-xcmg-excavator-xe80c-featured

XCMG XE80C

Weight

7460 Kg
Bucket

0.18 - 0.30 m³
Dig. Depth

4020 mm
Engine

Kubota 57.6 HP
Warranty

1 Yr. / 2500 hr.
Boom

3720 mm

₹ 38-39 Lakhs^*

Small (6-15 Ton)

desi-machines-excavator-sany-sy80-pro-featured

Sany SY80C-9 PRO

Weight

7920 Kg
Bucket

0.32-0.35 m³
Dig. Depth

4020 mm
Engine

Kubota 58 HP
Warranty

1 Yr. / 2500 hr.
Boom

3720 mm

Price Available Soon^*

Small (6-15 Ton)

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before macking any final decision.

Key Highlights	XCMG XE80C	Sany SY80C-9 PRO

XCMG XE80C VS Sany SY80C-9 PRO Excavator

XCMG XE80C

₹ 38-39 Lakhs

Sany SY80C-9 PRO

Price Available Soon

Particulars	XCMG XE80C	Sany SY80C-9 PRO

Overview Summary

Comparing the Sany SY80C-9 PRO and the XCMG XE80C excavators shows key differences in features such as bucket capacities, operator amenities like GPS and AC cabins, and performance-related specs like torque and travel speeds. These factors play a significant role in determining the suitability of each model for specific construction scenarios.

Sany SY80C-9 PRO

Pros:

Higher bucket capacity of 0.32-0.35 m³ compared to XCMG XE80C
Diesel consumption is specified at 5 L/hour, which might be useful for operational cost calculation
Higher engine torque at 225 Nm for potentially better performance in tough conditions
GPS comes as a standard feature, enhancing navigational and tracking capabilities
Greater digging force at 56 kN suggesting potent earthmoving capability
Higher gradeability of 70% (35°) which might be advantageous on steep terrains

Cons:

Price information not available, which may be a deciding factor for some buyers
Travel speed on high is slightly lower at 4.4 Km/h compared to XCMG XE80C
Longer overall length could pose a challenge in confined spaces
Operating weight is slightly higher which could affect transportation and operating costs

XCMG XE80C

Pros:

Price is listed, enabling potential buyers to budget accordingly
Standard AC cabin providing operator comfort that could enhance productivity
Slightly higher travel speed on high at 5.4 Km/h, potentially increasing on-site efficiency
Lower operating weight could result in easier transportation and reduced ground pressure effects
Greater counterweight clearance might be beneficial for operation on uneven terrains

Cons:

Smaller bucket capacity range of 0.18 - 0.30 m³ may limit the amount of material moved per cycle
GPS not available, which could be a disadvantage for fleet management and tracking
No fuel consumption (mileage) data provided, making operational cost estimation harder
Max tracking force is higher at 68.3 kN, though other performance specs like bucket digging force are not available

Closing Recommendation

The choice between the Sany SY80C-9 PRO and the XCMG XE80C would depend on the buyer's priorities. If bucket capacity, torque, and gradeability are critical, the Sany SY80C-9 PRO would be advantageous. However, for those who prioritize a lower purchase price, standard cabin comforts, and higher travel speeds, the XCMG XE80C might be the better option. Conduct a thorough examination of project requirements and budget constraints to make an informed decision.