CAT 320D3 GC vs Volvo EC200D: the two differ on 67 of 95 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (Ashoke Leyland 114 HP vs Volvo 156 HP), Price (₹75 - 88 lakh vs ₹53 - 55 lakh), Operating Weight (19800 Kg vs 19760 Kg), Bucket Capacity (0.92 m³ vs 0.8 - 0.92 m³). The other 28 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
CAT 320D3 GC
Volvo EC200D
CAT 320D3 GC
VS
Volvo EC200D
Excavator
CAT 320D3 GC vs Volvo EC200D: the two differ on 67 of 95 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (Ashoke Leyland 114 HP vs Volvo 156 HP), Price (₹75 - 88 lakh vs ₹53 - 55 lakh), Operating Weight (19800 Kg vs 19760 Kg), Bucket Capacity (0.92 m³ vs 0.8 - 0.92 m³). The other 28 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
CAT 320D3 GC
₹75 - 88 lakh
Volvo EC200D
₹53 - 55 lakh
Particulars
CAT 320D3 GC
Volvo EC200D
CAT 320D3 GC vs Volvo EC200D: Which One to Buy?
If lower running cost matters most, the CAT 320D3 GC is the safer pick; if you need more power and reach, the Volvo EC200D pulls ahead. The CAT runs on a 114 HP diesel engine and uses only 11 to 13 litres of fuel an hour, so it costs less to run day after day, and it comes with AC and GPS as standard. The Volvo has a stronger 156 HP engine with high torque, a longer 2900 mm arm for deeper digging, and better gradeability of 70% for working on slopes.
If you dig on flatter ground and want to keep fuel bills down, the CAT 320D3 GC does the job well. If your site has slopes or you need extra reach and digging power, the Volvo EC200D is built for that harder work. Browse the full CAT excavator range, the Volvo excavator range, all excavators, or read our excavator guide to compare more medium excavators.
CAT 320D3 GC Excavator
Pros:
Equipped with a robust Ashoke Leyland engine with a power of 114 HP at 1700 rpm, which is reliable for heavy-duty applications.
Features like standard AC cabin and GPS ensure operator comfort and equipment tracking.
Its undercarriage length and bucket capacity are designed to handle medium excavation tasks efficiently.
Lower fuel consumption at 11-13 L/hour can lead to reduced operational costs.
Cons:
Engine power is less compared to the Volvo EC200D, which might result in lower performance in demanding conditions.
Missing torque information, which is critical for understanding the excavator's performance capabilities.
Some hydraulic specifications and travel speeds are not provided, which might impact the assessment of its efficiency.
Volvo EC200D Excavator
Pros:
Powerful Volvo D5E engine with higher engine power rating of 156 HP at 2000 rpm and high torque of 670 Nm.
Increased operational efficiency due to advanced hydraulic system with two variable displacement axial piston pumps.
Better gradeability at 70% (35°), which enhances its ability to work on steep slopes and uneven terrain.
Longer arm length of 2900 mm can result in higher reach and depth of excavation.
Cons:
Higher entry price point, which might be a consideration for budget-conscious buyers.
The fuel consumption rating is not provided, leaving potential operating cost evaluations incomplete.
While the operating weight is similar to CAT 320D3 GC, a range is given (19760-20130 Kg), suggesting variations that may affect transportation logistics.
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both are solid medium excavators for regular construction work. Choose the CAT 320D3 GC when running cost matters most and your ground is fairly flat. Choose the Volvo EC200D when you need more engine power, better grip on slopes, and deeper reach for tougher digging. So match the machine to your work: CAT 320D3 GC for low running cost on flat ground, Volvo EC200D for power and reach on tougher terrain.
CAT 320D3 GC Vs Volvo EC200D Excavator Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The CAT 320D3 GC is a 20-ton excavator designed to achieve the lowest possible cost per operating hour in India. It features an Ashok Leyland ALUW06DTI engine that produces 114 HP at 1,700 rpm, offering mechanical simplicity and easy field servicing. Weighing around 19,800 kg, this dependable CAT excavator performs reliably in sand loading, site clearance, and general earthmoving tasks. With a maximum digging depth of 5,970 mm, it is well-suited for most everyday construction and utility excavation work. A bucket capacity of 0.92 m³ ensures steady material movement per cycle. The HD reinforced stick can accept both hammer and bucket attachments without restrictions. Greased track links between pins and bushings help prolong the undercarriage life and reduce travel noise in urban and residential areas. Standard and Eco modes enable fuel savings while keeping the operator’s working rhythm consistent. The 350-litre tank uses an average of 11 to 13 litres per hour under mixed site conditions. The CAT 320D3 excavator price in India ranges from Rs. 75 to 88 lakh. This excavator from Caterpillar Construction Equipment is a practical choice for fleet owners and rental operators focusing on consistent uptime and low running costs.
Volvo trimmed the EC200D to what daily earthwork actually needs. It is a medium excavator of 19760-20130 kg with a four-cylinder D5E rated 156 HP, buckets of 0.8-0.92 m³ and a 6680 mm digging depth. The 330 L fuel tank and lighter frame suit steady, repeatable site work over headline numbers.
Hiring fleets and owner-operators like this format because it moves easily between jobs and keeps consumption modest. Bucket digging force is 130 kN, dump height is 6570 mm, reach is 9840 mm, and Volvo fits the AC cabin, GPS and 1-year/2000-hour warranty as standard.
Agency review
Planning to buy the CAT 320D3 GC Excavator in India? Get the best price, EMI & finance options, and delivery timelines by submitting a quick enquiry.
Planning to buy the Volvo EC200D Excavator in India? Get the best price, EMI & finance options, and delivery timelines by submitting a quick enquiry.
CAT 320D3 GC vs Volvo EC200D: Which One to Buy?
If lower running cost matters most, the CAT 320D3 GC is the safer pick; if you need more power and reach, the Volvo EC200D pulls ahead. The CAT runs on a 114 HP diesel engine and uses only 11 to 13 litres of fuel an hour, so it costs less to run day after day, and it comes with AC and GPS as standard. The Volvo has a stronger 156 HP engine with high torque, a longer 2900 mm arm for deeper digging, and better gradeability of 70% for working on slopes.
If you dig on flatter ground and want to keep fuel bills down, the CAT 320D3 GC does the job well. If your site has slopes or you need extra reach and digging power, the Volvo EC200D is built for that harder work. Browse the full CAT excavator range, the Volvo excavator range, all excavators, or read our excavator guide to compare more medium excavators.
CAT 320D3 GC Excavator
Pros:
Equipped with a robust Ashoke Leyland engine with a power of 114 HP at 1700 rpm, which is reliable for heavy-duty applications.
Features like standard AC cabin and GPS ensure operator comfort and equipment tracking.
Its undercarriage length and bucket capacity are designed to handle medium excavation tasks efficiently.
Lower fuel consumption at 11-13 L/hour can lead to reduced operational costs.
Cons:
Engine power is less compared to the Volvo EC200D, which might result in lower performance in demanding conditions.
Missing torque information, which is critical for understanding the excavator's performance capabilities.
Some hydraulic specifications and travel speeds are not provided, which might impact the assessment of its efficiency.
Volvo EC200D Excavator
Pros:
Powerful Volvo D5E engine with higher engine power rating of 156 HP at 2000 rpm and high torque of 670 Nm.
Increased operational efficiency due to advanced hydraulic system with two variable displacement axial piston pumps.
Better gradeability at 70% (35°), which enhances its ability to work on steep slopes and uneven terrain.
Longer arm length of 2900 mm can result in higher reach and depth of excavation.
Cons:
Higher entry price point, which might be a consideration for budget-conscious buyers.
The fuel consumption rating is not provided, leaving potential operating cost evaluations incomplete.
While the operating weight is similar to CAT 320D3 GC, a range is given (19760-20130 Kg), suggesting variations that may affect transportation logistics.
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both are solid medium excavators for regular construction work. Choose the CAT 320D3 GC when running cost matters most and your ground is fairly flat. Choose the Volvo EC200D when you need more engine power, better grip on slopes, and deeper reach for tougher digging. So match the machine to your work: CAT 320D3 GC for low running cost on flat ground, Volvo EC200D for power and reach on tougher terrain.
CAT 320D3 GC Vs Volvo EC200D Excavator Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The CAT 320D3 GC is a 20-ton excavator designed to achieve the lowest possible cost per operating hour in India. It features an Ashok Leyland ALUW06DTI engine that produces 114 HP at 1,700 rpm, offering mechanical simplicity and easy field servicing. Weighing around 19,800 kg, this dependable CAT excavator performs reliably in sand loading, site clearance, and general earthmoving tasks. With a maximum digging depth of 5,970 mm, it is well-suited for most everyday construction and utility excavation work. A bucket capacity of 0.92 m³ ensures steady material movement per cycle. The HD reinforced stick can accept both hammer and bucket attachments without restrictions. Greased track links between pins and bushings help prolong the undercarriage life and reduce travel noise in urban and residential areas. Standard and Eco modes enable fuel savings while keeping the operator’s working rhythm consistent. The 350-litre tank uses an average of 11 to 13 litres per hour under mixed site conditions. The CAT 320D3 excavator price in India ranges from Rs. 75 to 88 lakh. This excavator from Caterpillar Construction Equipment is a practical choice for fleet owners and rental operators focusing on consistent uptime and low running costs.
Volvo trimmed the EC200D to what daily earthwork actually needs. It is a medium excavator of 19760-20130 kg with a four-cylinder D5E rated 156 HP, buckets of 0.8-0.92 m³ and a 6680 mm digging depth. The 330 L fuel tank and lighter frame suit steady, repeatable site work over headline numbers.
Hiring fleets and owner-operators like this format because it moves easily between jobs and keeps consumption modest. Bucket digging force is 130 kN, dump height is 6570 mm, reach is 9840 mm, and Volvo fits the AC cabin, GPS and 1-year/2000-hour warranty as standard.
67 differ · 28 identical
Key highlights: CAT 320D3 GC vs Volvo EC200D Excavator
CAT 320D3 GC
Volvo EC200D
Engine Make
Ashoke Leyland ALUW06DTI
Volvo D5E
Fuel Tank
350 L
330 L
Engine Displacment
5.76 L
4.7 L
Under Carriage
4080 mm
4170 mm
Hydraulic System
230 L
280 L
Arm
2500 mm
2900 mm
Max Digging Reach
NA
9840 mm
Fuel Consumption
11-13 L/hour
NA
Overall Width
2800 mm
2800 mm
Overall Length
9520 mm
9560 mm
Bucket Digging Force
134 kN
130 kN
Tailswing Radius
2750 mm
2860 mm
Track Shoe Width
600 mm
600 mm
AC Cabin
Standard
Standard
GPS
Standard
Standard
Key highlights: CAT 320D3 GC vs Volvo EC200D Excavator
CAT 320D3 GC
Volvo EC200D
Engine Make
Ashoke Leyland ALUW06DTI
Volvo D5E
Fuel Tank
350 L
330 L
Engine Displacment
5.76 L
4.7 L
Under Carriage
4080 mm
4170 mm
Hydraulic System
230 L
280 L
Arm
2500 mm
2900 mm
Max Digging Reach
NA
9840 mm
Fuel Consumption
11-13 L/hour
NA
Overall Width
2800 mm
2800 mm
Overall Length
9520 mm
9560 mm
Bucket Digging Force
134 kN
130 kN
Tailswing Radius
2750 mm
2860 mm
Track Shoe Width
600 mm
600 mm
AC Cabin
Standard
Standard
GPS
Standard
Standard
Full specifications: CAT 320D3 GC vs Volvo EC200D Excavator
Engine
3520
3645
Model
Ashoke Leyland 114 HP
Volvo 156 HP
Fuel
Diesel
Diesel
Type
NA
4 cylinders
Rated Engine Power
114 HP (100 kW) @ 1700 rpm
156 HP (115 kW) @ 2000 rpm
Maximum Torque
NA
670 Nm @ 1600 rpm
Piston Displacement
5.76 L
4.7 L
Alternator
24V
28V / 80A
Battery
NA
100 AH
,
2 x 12V
Starting Motor
NA
24V - 5.5 kW
Undercarriage
24V - 5.5 kW
24V - 5.5 kW
No of Top rollers
NA
2 x 2
No of bottom rollers
NA
2 x 7
Track Shoes (Each Side)
NA
2 x 46
Track Guard
NA
NA
Track Shoe width
600 mm
600 mm
Ground bearing pressure
NA
44.2 kPa
Track Tensioning
Grease
Grease
Gradeability
NA
70% (35°)
Travel Speed-Low
NA
3.3 Km/h
Travel Speed-High
NA
5.5 Km/h
Max Tracking Force
NA
174 kN
Hydraulic System
CAT 320D3 GC
Volvo EC200D
Hydraulic pump
NA
2 x variable displacement axial piston pumps
Maximum Flow
400 L/min
2 x 200 L/min
Pilot Pump
Gear Pump
Gear Pump
Implement Circuit
35.0 MPa
32.4 MPa
Swing Circuit
25.0 MPa
28.4 MPa
Travel circuit
35.0 MPa
32.4 MPa
Pilot circuit
NA
3.9 MPa
Hydraulic Motors
CAT 320D3 GC
Volvo EC200D
Travel
NA
Each track is powered by an automatic two-speed shift travel motor.
Swing
NA
Not Available
Service Capacities
CAT 320D3 GC
Volvo EC200D
Fuel tank
350 L
330 L
Engine Coolant
19 L
15 L
Engine oil
18 L
17 L
Hydraulic system
230 L
280 L
Hydraulic tank
110 L
145 L
Machine Weight
CAT 320D3 GC
Volvo EC200D
Operating Weight
19800 Kg
19760 Kg
Working Range
CAT 320D3 GC
Volvo EC200D
Boom length
5700 mm
5700 mm
Arm length
2500 mm
2900 mm
Max Digging Reach
NA
9840 mm
Max Digging Reach on ground
9140 mm
9700 mm
Max digging depth
5970 mm
6680 mm
Max digging height
9110 mm
9370 mm
Max Dump Height
6250 mm
6570 mm
Max vertical wallcut depth
5350 mm
6040 mm
Min swing radius
NA
3650 mm
Max Height at Min Swing radius
NA
NA
Max height (above ground)
NA
NA
Dig depth (below ground)
NA
NA
Bucket Digging Force
134 kN
130 kN
Arm Digging Force
112 kN
93 kN
Swing Speed
10 rpm
13.1 rpm
Dozer Blade
CAT 320D3 GC
Volvo EC200D
Dozer Type
NA
NA
Dozer Length
NA
NA
Digging depth for ground level
NA
NA
Approach Angle
NA
NA
Width
NA
NA
Height
NA
NA
Bucket
CAT 320D3 GC
Volvo EC200D
Bucket Capacity
0.92 m³
0.8 - 0.92 m³
Static Dimensions
CAT 320D3 GC
Volvo EC200D
Overall Length
9520 mm
9560 mm
Overall width
2800 mm
2800 mm
Overall Height
3100 mm
2920 mm
Overall Height of Cab
2915 mm
2910 mm
Upper Width
NA
2540 mm
Track Lengh on Ground
3270 mm
3370 mm
Undercarriage overall length
4080 mm
4170 mm
Tailswing radius
2750 mm
2860 mm
Min Ground clearance
450 mm
450 mm
Track gauge
2200 mm
2200 mm
Width over tracks
NA
NA
Track Height
NA
NA
Counterweight Clearance
1020 mm
1005 mm
Track Shoe Width
600 mm
600 mm
Full specifications: CAT 320D3 GC vs Volvo EC200D Excavator
Questions buyers ask about the CAT 320D3 GC vs Volvo EC200D
Ans.
The CAT 320D3 GC uses less fuel. It runs at 11 to 13 litres an hour, and the Volvo EC200D's fuel use is not listed, but its bigger 156 HP engine will typically use more diesel for the same work.
Ans.
The Volvo EC200D works better on slopes. It has a gradeability of 70% (35 degrees), which lets it grip and dig safely on steeper ground than a standard medium excavator.
Ans.
The Volvo EC200D can reach and dig deeper. Its arm is longer than the CAT 320D3 GC's, at 2900 mm, which gives it more reach into a trench or pit without repositioning.
Ans.
The CAT 320D3 GC has both AC and GPS fitted as standard. The Volvo EC200D's cabin comfort features are not listed here, so confirm this with your Volvo dealer before you decide.
Ans.
The CAT 320D3 GC suits a first-time owner-operator better. Its lower fuel use keeps running costs down, and it is built for steady, everyday medium excavation rather than tougher, sloped or deep-digging jobs.
CAT 320D3 GC Vs Volvo EC200D - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare CAT 320D3 GC Vs Volvo EC200D price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
