XCMG XE140i K HD VS Volvo EC140D Excavator

₹38 - 43 lakh^*

XCMG XE140i K HD

Weight

13700 Kg
Bucket

0.60 - 0.72 m³
Dig. Depth

5126 mm
Engine

Cummins 102 HP
Warranty

1 Yr. / 2000 hr.
Boom

4600 mm

Small (6-15 Ton)

Price Available Soon^*

Volvo EC140D

Weight

13130 Kg
Bucket

0.60 - 0.64 m³
Dig. Depth

5530 mm
Engine

Volvo 105 HP
Warranty

1 Yr. / 2000 hr.
Boom

4600 mm

Small (6-15 Ton)

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before macking any final decision.

XCMG XE140i K HD VS Volvo EC140D Excavator

XCMG XE140i K HD

₹38 - 43 lakh

Volvo EC140D

Price Available Soon

Particulars	XCMG XE140i K HD	Volvo EC140D

Overview Summary

The Volvo EC140D and XCMG XE140i K HD are comparable small excavators with subtle differences. The Volvo boasts superior gradeability and a larger bucket capacity on the lower end, with an advanced functionality emphasis, whereas the XCMG has a slightly higher torque and bucket capacity on the higher end, with a longer warranty period.

Volvo EC140D

Pros:

Equipped with Volvo D3.8E engine with 105 HP and optimal torque of 369.5 Nm leading to efficient performance
Features advanced functionality and precision for light earthmoving and construction
Has a larger bucket capacity on lower end – 0.60 m³ compared to XCMG's 0.60 m³
Better gradeability at 70% able to handle steeper terrain
Wider track shoe width of 600 mm, potentially offering better stability
Includes GPS as a standard feature, beneficial for fleet management and tracking

Cons:

Slightly less maximum torque compared to the XCMG XE140i K HD with 385 Nm
Absence of travel speed specification for low gear
Missing specific details on swing system compared to XCMG's higher swing speed specification
Operating weight varies; could be heavier at 13710 kg compared to XCMG's consistent 13700 kg

XCMG XE140i K HD

Pros:

Powered by Cummins B3.9 engine with close engine power of 102 HP
Longer warranty period of 2500 hours as opposed to Volvo's 2000 hours
Higher maximum torque valued at 385 Nm which could potentially offer better engine performance
Slightly greater bucket capacity on higher end – 0.72 m³ compared to Volvo's 0.64 m³
Swing speed of 12.3 rpm, which could translate to more efficient maneuvering
Slightly higher tracking force of 134 kN which may improve its capability in tough terrains

Cons:

Lacks GPS, which is a disadvantage for modern fleet management
Less gradeability at 35° might limit maneuverability on steep grades
Narrower track shoe width at 500 mm could affect stability
Hydraulic tank capacity is less than Volvo's which might impact hydraulic system performance

Closing Recommendation

Your choice between the Volvo EC140D and XCMG XE140i K HD should be guided by the specific requirements of your projects. Consider the gradeability, bucket capacity, warranty period, GPS availability, and torque when making your decision, ensuring that the selected excavator aligns with the operational needs and preferences of your worksite.