Apollo Carmix 30 FX
VS
Schwing Stetter SLM 2600
Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Apollo Carmix 30 FX vs Schwing Stetter SLM 2600: the two differ on 35 of 43 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (M&M 74.5 HP vs KOEL 74.5 HP), Bucket Capacity (400 L vs 415 L), Fuel Tank (130 L vs NA), Drum Capacity (3.0 m³ vs 2.4 m³). The other 8 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Schwing Stetter SLM 2600
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
VS
Schwing Stetter SLM 2600
Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Apollo Carmix 30 FX vs Schwing Stetter SLM 2600: the two differ on 35 of 43 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (M&M 74.5 HP vs KOEL 74.5 HP), Bucket Capacity (400 L vs 415 L), Fuel Tank (130 L vs NA), Drum Capacity (3.0 m³ vs 2.4 m³). The other 8 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
₹ 37 – 40 Lakhs
Schwing Stetter SLM 2600
₹ 35 - 37 Lakhs
Particulars
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Schwing Stetter SLM 2600
Apollo Carmix 30 FX vs Schwing Stetter SLM 2600: Which One to Buy?
The Apollo Carmix 30 FX carries a bigger drum and a double-helical mixing design, so it can move more concrete in one batch. The Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 answers with a wider 216-degree drum slew and dual pressure sensors for weighing, along with fully powered hydrostatic steering that makes it easier to turn in tight spots.
If your jobs need bigger batches per pour and rougher ground clearance, the Apollo Carmix 30 FX is the stronger fit. If you value precise, sensor-based weighing and easier steering in cramped sites, the Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 does that better. Browse the full self-loading mixer range, the Schwing Stetter lineup, or read our concrete mixer buying guide.
Schwing Stetter SLM 2600
Pros:
Designed for versatility with 216° drum slew for improved site productivity
Equipped with dual pressure sensors for precise weighing
Features 4 Speed Automotive Type Transmission for smooth operations
Includes Hydrostatic Steering (Fully Powered) for better maneuverability
Cons:
Drum capacity is lower at 2.4 m³ compared to Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Missing data on fuel tank and hydraulic tank capacity
Gradeability is superior but not specified in degrees for direct comparison
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Pros:
Double-helical drum and optional camera for enhanced mixing and operator comfort
Higher drum capacity of 3.0 m³ for larger batches of concrete
Load-Cell weighing technology for accurate measurement
Greater ground clearance at 385 mm for rough terrain
Cons:
Less advanced steering type - Hydraulic; 3-Way compared to Schwing Stetter's fully powered hydrostatic steering
Drum slewing degree not available for comparison
Lower gradeability specified in degrees, potentially limiting performance on slopes
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both these mixers come from established brands and cover the same drum-size class, so the choice comes down to how you work on site. Choose the Apollo Carmix 30 FX when you need a bigger batch per pour and better ground clearance for rough sites. Choose the Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 when tight turning, precise sensor-based weighing, and a wide drum slew matter more for your jobs. So match the machine to your work: Apollo Carmix 30 FX for bigger batches and rough ground, Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 for tight sites and precise weighing.
Apollo Carmix 30 FX Vs Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 Self Loading Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Apollo Carmix 30 FX self-loading concrete mixer features double-helical drum, hydraulic shuttered bucket, and optional camera for enhanced mixing and operator comfort.
Designed for versatility, the Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 provides precise control with sensors and a 216° slew. This feature improves site productivity.
Apollo Carmix 30 FX vs Schwing Stetter SLM 2600: Which One to Buy?
The Apollo Carmix 30 FX carries a bigger drum and a double-helical mixing design, so it can move more concrete in one batch. The Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 answers with a wider 216-degree drum slew and dual pressure sensors for weighing, along with fully powered hydrostatic steering that makes it easier to turn in tight spots.
If your jobs need bigger batches per pour and rougher ground clearance, the Apollo Carmix 30 FX is the stronger fit. If you value precise, sensor-based weighing and easier steering in cramped sites, the Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 does that better. Browse the full self-loading mixer range, the Schwing Stetter lineup, or read our concrete mixer buying guide.
Schwing Stetter SLM 2600
Pros:
Designed for versatility with 216° drum slew for improved site productivity
Equipped with dual pressure sensors for precise weighing
Features 4 Speed Automotive Type Transmission for smooth operations
Includes Hydrostatic Steering (Fully Powered) for better maneuverability
Cons:
Drum capacity is lower at 2.4 m³ compared to Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Missing data on fuel tank and hydraulic tank capacity
Gradeability is superior but not specified in degrees for direct comparison
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Pros:
Double-helical drum and optional camera for enhanced mixing and operator comfort
Higher drum capacity of 3.0 m³ for larger batches of concrete
Load-Cell weighing technology for accurate measurement
Greater ground clearance at 385 mm for rough terrain
Cons:
Less advanced steering type - Hydraulic; 3-Way compared to Schwing Stetter's fully powered hydrostatic steering
Drum slewing degree not available for comparison
Lower gradeability specified in degrees, potentially limiting performance on slopes
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both these mixers come from established brands and cover the same drum-size class, so the choice comes down to how you work on site. Choose the Apollo Carmix 30 FX when you need a bigger batch per pour and better ground clearance for rough sites. Choose the Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 when tight turning, precise sensor-based weighing, and a wide drum slew matter more for your jobs. So match the machine to your work: Apollo Carmix 30 FX for bigger batches and rough ground, Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 for tight sites and precise weighing.
Apollo Carmix 30 FX Vs Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 Self Loading Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Apollo Carmix 30 FX self-loading concrete mixer features double-helical drum, hydraulic shuttered bucket, and optional camera for enhanced mixing and operator comfort.
Designed for versatility, the Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 provides precise control with sensors and a 216° slew. This feature improves site productivity.
35 differ · 8 identical
Key highlights: Apollo Carmix 30 FX vs Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 Self Loading
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Schwing Stetter SLM 2600
Engine Make
M&M MCVNCS3170T4C5E
KOEL / Mahindra
Fuel Tank
130 L
NA
Hydraulic Tank
70 L
NA
Bucket Capacity
400 L
415 L
Water Pump Capacity
NA
NA
Drum Rotation Speed
0-18 rpm
0 to 21 rpm
Overall Length
6710 mm
4703 mm
Overall Width
2190 mm
2172 mm
Overall Height
3625 mm
3493 mm
Tyres
12.5-20 PR 12
NA
Key highlights: Apollo Carmix 30 FX vs Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 Self Loading
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Schwing Stetter SLM 2600
Engine Make
M&M MCVNCS3170T4C5E
KOEL / Mahindra
Fuel Tank
130 L
NA
Hydraulic Tank
70 L
NA
Bucket Capacity
400 L
415 L
Water Pump Capacity
NA
NA
Drum Rotation Speed
0-18 rpm
0 to 21 rpm
Overall Length
6710 mm
4703 mm
Overall Width
2190 mm
2172 mm
Overall Height
3625 mm
3493 mm
Tyres
12.5-20 PR 12
NA
Full specifications: Apollo Carmix 30 FX vs Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 Self Loading
Engine
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Schwing Stetter SLM 2600
Engine Make
M&M MCVNCS3170T4C5E
KOEL / Mahindra
Engine Type
Water Cooled; Turbo Charged
CEV-5 / BS-5
Max. Power
74.5 HP (55.6 kW) @ 2200 RPM
74.5 HP (54.64 kW) / 74.8HP (55.78 kW)
Drive & Control
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Schwing Stetter SLM 2600
Transmission Type
Electric‑servo travel; 4WD/4WS reversible
4 Speed Automotive Type
Steering Type
Hydraulic; 3-Way
Hydrostatic Steering (Fully Powered)
Drive Type
4 Wheel Drive
4 Wheel Drive
Brake
Oil‑bath built‑in disc brakes
Dual brake circuit with Power Assisted Hydraulic Brake
Max. Speed
27 km/h
27 km/h
Gradeability
16° - 17°
24³
Mixer
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Schwing Stetter SLM 2600
Drum Capacity
3.0 m³
2.4 m³
Drum Slewing Degree
NA
216°
Drum Rotation Speed
0-18 rpm
0 to 21 rpm
Bucket Capacity
400 L
415 L
Fuel Tank
130 L
NA
Water Tank Capacity
2 × 275 L
380 L
Water Pump Capacity
NA
NA
Weight Unladen**
5900 kg
7065 kg
Weighing Technology
Load-Cell
Dual Pressure Sensors
Dimensions
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Schwing Stetter SLM 2600
Overall Length
6710 mm
4703 mm
Overall Width
2190 mm
2172 mm
Overall Height
3625 mm
3493 mm
Tyres
12.5-20 PR 12
NA
Ground Clearance
385 mm
NA
Full specifications: Apollo Carmix 30 FX vs Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 Self Loading
Engine
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Schwing Stetter SLM 2600
Engine Make
M&M MCVNCS3170T4C5E
KOEL / Mahindra
Engine Type
Water Cooled; Turbo Charged
CEV-5 / BS-5
Max. Power
74.5 HP (55.6 kW) @ 2200 RPM
74.5 HP (54.64 kW) / 74.8HP (55.78 kW)
Drive & Control
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Schwing Stetter SLM 2600
Transmission Type
Electric‑servo travel; 4WD/4WS reversible
4 Speed Automotive Type
Steering Type
Hydraulic; 3-Way
Hydrostatic Steering (Fully Powered)
Drive Type
4 Wheel Drive
4 Wheel Drive
Brake
Oil‑bath built‑in disc brakes
Dual brake circuit with Power Assisted Hydraulic Brake
Questions buyers ask about the Apollo Carmix 30 FX vs Schwing Stetter SLM 2600
Ans.
The Apollo Carmix 30 FX has a bigger drum, at 3.0 cubic metres against the Schwing Stetter SLM 2600's 2.4 cubic metres. It can mix more concrete in a single batch.
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 has more advanced steering, with fully powered hydrostatic steering against the Apollo Carmix 30 FX's hydraulic three-way steering. This can make it easier to turn in a tight site.
Ans.
Yes, the Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 uses dual pressure sensors for weighing, which gives an accurate, repeatable mix. The Apollo Carmix 30 FX uses load-cell weighing technology instead, which is also accurate but works on a different principle.
Ans.
The Apollo Carmix 30 FX has better ground clearance, at 385 mm. This helps it cross rough or uneven ground without scraping the underside.
Ans.
Drum slewing degree is how far the mixing drum can turn to pour concrete without moving the machine. The Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 offers 216 degrees of drum slew, which gives it more pouring angles from one spot.
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 is better for tight urban sites, thanks to its fully powered hydrostatic steering and wide drum slew. The Apollo Carmix 30 FX suits sites where batch size and ground clearance matter more than turning tightness.
Apollo Carmix 30 FX Vs Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Apollo Carmix 30 FX Vs Schwing Stetter SLM 2600 price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
