CASE 952NX VS Dynapac CC425 CEV-V Compactor

₹ 32 - 34 Lakhs^*

CASE 952NX

Weight

9200 kg
Drum Width

1675 mm
Engine

CNH 74 HP
Static Load

27.5 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

75.5/59.4 kN
Travel Speed

0 - 11.5 km/hr

Tandem Roller

₹ 35-37 Lakhs^*

Dynapac CC425 CEV-V

Weight

9200 kg
Drum Width

1690 mm
Engine

KOEL 74.5 HP
Static Load

27.2 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

130/60 kN
Travel Speed

0 - 12 km/hr

Tandem Roller

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

CASE 952NX VS Dynapac CC425 CEV-V Compactor

CASE 952NX

₹ 32 - 34 Lakhs

Dynapac CC425 CEV-V

₹ 35-37 Lakhs

Particulars	CASE 952NX	Dynapac CC425 CEV-V

CASE 952NX vs Dynapac CC425 CEV-V: Which One to Buy?

The CASE 952NX and the Dynapac CC425 CEV-V are both tandem roller compactors for road and site compaction work. The CASE 952NX comes with smart telematics and a dual amplitude-frequency system as standard, so you get more control over compaction settings and can track the machine from a distance. The Dynapac CC425 CEV-V delivers a higher maximum centrifugal force, handles steeper slopes, and turns in a tighter radius, plus carries a longer warranty of 18 months.

If you want telematics and flexible compaction settings built in as standard, the CASE 952NX is the stronger pick. If your work involves steep grades or tight sites and you want a longer warranty, the Dynapac CC425 CEV-V suits that better. See the full CASE compactor range and Dynapac compactor range, browse all compactors, or read our compactor buying guide.

CASE 952NX Tandem Roller Compactor

Pros:

Equipped with a fuel-efficient and emissions-reduced CNH 74 HP engine
Delivers 121.6 kN of maximum compaction force
Features a dual amplitude-frequency system for versatile compaction
Includes an efficient hydrostatic drive and smart telematics as standard
Larger fuel tank capacity of 170 liters

Cons:

Lower maximum gradeability compared to the Dynapac CC425 (36% vs 39%)
Higher ground clearance that might affect stability in certain conditions (320 mm vs 282 mm)
Standard turning radius not provided

Dynapac CC425 CEV-V Tandem Roller Compactor

Pros:

Generates a higher maximum centrifugal force of 130 kN
Offers stronger gradeability for steep slopes (39%)
Designed for operator safety with features like ROPS and LED lights
Superior maneuverability with a smaller turning radius (inside: 4900 mm)
Longer warranty period of 18 months

Cons:

Telematics offered as an optional feature rather than standard
Fuel tank slightly smaller than CASE 952NX (180 liters vs 170 liters)
Missing data on a few specifications like hydraulic tank, engine displacement, and water tank capacity

Closing Recommendation

Choose the Dynapac CC425 CEV-V when your work involves steep grades, tighter sites, and you want a longer warranty along with more compaction force. Choose the CASE 952NX when you want telematics and flexible compaction settings built in as standard. Both are strong tandem roller compactors, so let your site conditions guide the pick. So match the machine to your work: Dynapac CC425 CEV-V for steep, tight sites with more compaction force, CASE 952NX for telematics and flexible settings.