XCMG ZL55GV VS Liugong 856H MAX Wheel Loader

₹ 78-80 Lakhs^*

XCMG ZL55GV

Engine

Weichai 230 HP
Bucket

3 - 5.5 m³
Weight

17300 kg
Fwd. Speed

40 km/h
Dump Height

3040 mm
Tripping Load

11000 kg

Medium (15-30 Ton)

₹ 65-85 Lakhs^*

Liugong 856H MAX

Engine

Yuchai 225 HP
Bucket

3.5 m³
Weight

18350 kg
Fwd. Speed

37 km/h
Dump Height

3015 mm
Tripping Load

13878 kg

Medium (15-30 Ton)

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

XCMG ZL55GV VS Liugong 856H MAX Wheel Loader

XCMG ZL55GV

₹ 78-80 Lakhs

Liugong 856H MAX

₹ 65-85 Lakhs

Particulars	XCMG ZL55GV	Liugong 856H MAX

LiuGong 856H MAX vs XCMG ZL55GV: Which Wheel Loader to Buy?

Both the LiuGong 856H MAX and the XCMG ZL55GV are strong Chinese-made wheel loaders now common on Indian sites, and each is backed by a growing dealer network here. The real difference is in how they push through the work. The LiuGong has stronger hydraulics and more pulling force, so it digs into hard piles and lifts heavy loads with less strain. The XCMG has more engine power and moves faster between loading and dumping, so it can complete more trips in a shift on easier material.

If your work is quarry or mining loading, where the pile is hard and the load is heavy, the LiuGong suits you better. If your work is general construction or road material handling, where speed between trips matters more, the XCMG suits you better. Parts for both are not hard to find in most parts of India today. See the full LiuGong wheel loader range, the XCMG wheel loader range, more wheel loaders, or our wheel loader buying guide.

XCMG ZL55GV Wheel Loader

Pros:

Higher engine power at 230 HP providing robust performance
Includes a turbocharged engine meeting CEV Stage IV emission standards
Higher top forward speed at 40 km/h, which may contribute to faster cycle times in operations
Large fuel tank capacity at 300 L, potentially reducing the frequency of refueling stops

Cons:

Slightly lower max torque compared to the Liugong 856H MAX
Less advanced transmission system compared to the twin turbine, four members converter in the Liugong 856H MAX
Fewer details provided about the hydraulic system compared to the Liugong model

Liugong 856H MAX Wheel Loader

Pros:

Advanced hydraulics with variable displacement piston pump and a higher system pressure at 190 bar for efficient operations
Higher max torque at 1200 Nm which may result in better performance in tough conditions
Greater tipping load capacity, both straight and full turn, indicating potential for handling heavier loads securely

Cons:

Slightly lower engine power at 225 HP
Shorter wheelbase compared to the XCMG ZL55GV, which could affect stability during certain operations
Lower top forward speed at 37 km/h which may impact cycle time efficiency

Closing Recommendation

Both loaders are strong performers, so the choice comes down to the kind of work you do most. Choose the LiuGong 856H MAX when your pile is hard and your loads are heavy, because its stronger hydraulics and pulling force get more done with less strain on the machine. Choose the XCMG ZL55GV when your work is faster-paced general loading, because its extra engine power and higher speed help you complete more trips in a shift. Both come from growing dealer networks in India, so parts and service are not a worry either way. So match the machine to your work: LiuGong for heavy, hard-pile loading, XCMG for faster general material handling.