HAMM HC 139iD VS JCB VM117 Compactor

₹ 37-39 Lakhs^*

HAMM HC 139iD

Weight

13160 kg
Drum Width

2140 mm
Engine

Ashok Leyland 128 HP
Static Load

34.9 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

241/145 kN
Travel Speed

0–12.0 km/hr

Soil Compactor

₹ 36-38 Lakhs^*

JCB VM117

Weight

11525 kg
Drum Width

2100 mm
Engine

JCB 74 HP
Static Load

30.96 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

256/146 kN
Travel Speed

10 km/hr

Soil Compactor

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

HAMM HC 139iD VS JCB VM117 Compactor

HAMM HC 139iD

₹ 37-39 Lakhs

JCB VM117

₹ 36-38 Lakhs

Particulars	HAMM HC 139iD	JCB VM117

HAMM HC 139iD vs JCB VM117: Which One Should You Buy?

Both these are heavy-duty soil compactors built for large infrastructure sites. The HAMM HC 139iD runs a more powerful 128 HP engine, climbs steeper slopes, and covers more ground per pass with its wider 2140 mm drum. The JCB VM117 comes in two variants (Non-Drum Drive and Drum Drive), carries a bigger 300 litre fuel tank, and includes telematics as standard for tracking the machine.

If your project needs strong power and the site has steep grades, the HAMM HC 139iD's engine and gradeability get the job done faster. If you want variant choice, a bigger fuel tank for longer runs, and telematics built in without an extra cost, the JCB VM117 fits that need. See the full JCB compactor range, the HAMM compactor range, all compactors, or our compactor buying guide.

HAMM HC 139iD

Pros:

Higher engine power of 128 HP supports better performance in challenging conditions
Higher static linear load (34.9 kg/cm) can potentially offer better compaction efficiency
Wider drum width (2140 mm) covers more ground for increased productivity
Higher maximum gradeability (48%) enables better operation on steep slopes
Higher centrifugal force in high amplitude setting (241 kN) for heavy compaction tasks
Includes an ECO mode for improved fuel efficiency
Hydrostatic drive braking offers smooth operation and control

Cons:

Optional telematics system rather than standard, possibly indicating additional costs
Lower fuel tank capacity (270 L) compared to competitor

JCB VM117

Pros:

Available in two variants (Non-Drum Drive and Drum Drive), offering versatile options for different projects
Higher standard static linear load (30.96 kg/cm) than some comparably sized models
Larger fuel tank capacity (300 L) for extended operation times
Standard telematics system included for better machine management and optimization
Centrifugal force in high amplitude setting (256 kN) provides powerful compaction performance
Wider operating weight range, facilitating flexible application in various conditions
Hydraulically-released multi-disk brake enhances safety and control

Cons:

Lower engine power of 74 HP might reduce performance on highly demanding tasks
Lower maximum gradeability (28%) could limit effectiveness on steep terrain
Slightly narrower drum width (2100 mm) means less surface coverage per pass

Closing Recommendation

Both the HAMM HC 139iD and the JCB VM117 are heavy-duty compactors built for large infrastructure work. Choose the HAMM HC 139iD when your project needs more engine power and the site has steep slopes to climb. Choose the JCB VM117 when you want variant choice, a bigger fuel tank and telematics included as standard. So match the machine to your work: HAMM HC 139iD for power and slopes, JCB VM117 for fuel range and built-in tracking.