HAMM HC 139iD VS LiuGong 611 Compactor

₹ 37-39 Lakhs^*

HAMM HC 139iD

Weight

13160 kg
Drum Width

2140 mm
Engine

Ashok Leyland 128 HP
Static Load

34.9 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

241/145 kN
Travel Speed

0–12.0 km/hr

Soil Compactor

₹ 34-36 Lakhs^*

LiuGong 611

Weight

11000 kg
Drum Width

2130 mm
Engine

KOEL 110 HP
Static Load

29.1 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

270/125 kN
Travel Speed

0-13 km/hr

Soil Compactor

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

HAMM HC 139iD VS LiuGong 611 Compactor

HAMM HC 139iD

₹ 37-39 Lakhs

LiuGong 611

₹ 34-36 Lakhs

Particulars	HAMM HC 139iD	LiuGong 611

HAMM HC 139iD vs LiuGong 611: Which Compactor to Buy?

Both are single drum soil compactors, but they suit different ground and site sizes. The HAMM HC 139iD has more engine power, a heavier drum load, and handles steeper slopes, which suits bigger road and embankment jobs. The LiuGong 611 is lighter, easier to turn in tight spaces, and gives a higher centrifugal force at its top setting, which suits smaller sites and confined work areas.

If your project has steep grades or needs strong, steady compaction on bigger stretches, the HAMM does that work well and its hydrostatic drive braking adds extra safety. If your site is smaller or has tight corners, the LiuGong's lighter build and smaller turning radius make daily movement easier, and its stronger vibration setting still gives good compaction. Both brands are supported by dealers in India, see the HAMM compactor range and LiuGong compactor range, browse all compactors, or read the compactor buying guide.

HAMM HC 139iD Soil Compactor Roller

Pros:

Higher engine power at 128 HP leading to better performance
Superior static linear load of 34.9 kg/cm enables effective compaction
Greater maximum gradeability of 48% for steep gradients
Hydrostatic drive braking system ensures safer operation
Larger fuel capacity with a 270 L tank

Cons:

Slightly heavier with an operating weight of 13160 kg, which may impact maneuverability
Lower highest centrifugal force compared to LiuGong 611 when set to high amplitude

LiuGong 611 Soil Compactor Roller

Pros:

Lighter operating weight at 11000 kg may offer better maneuverability
Higher centrifugal force of up to 270 kN for effective compaction
More compact and easier to navigate with smaller turning radius, outside
Larger engine coolant capacity which could imply better cooling and longer operation periods

Cons:

Lower engine power at 110 HP compared to HAMM HC 139iD
Smaller static linear load of 29.1 kg/cm which might affect compaction efficiency
Less gradeability at 35%, which could reduce functionality on slopes

Closing Recommendation

Match the compactor to your ground and site size. Choose the HAMM HC 139iD when your work has steep slopes or needs strong, steady drum pressure on bigger stretches. Choose the LiuGong 611 when your site is smaller, has tight corners, and needs a lighter, easier-to-turn machine. So match the machine to your work: HAMM HC 139iD for steep-grade, heavy compaction jobs, LiuGong 611 for smaller sites and tight-space work.