Liugong 838H MAX VS ACE ALN 300 Wheel Loader

₹ 53-55 Lakhs^*

Liugong 838H MAX

Engine

Ashok Leyland 160 HP
Bucket

2.4 m³
Weight

12210 kg
Fwd. Speed

38 km/h
Dump Height

2950 mm
Tripping Load

7900 kg

Small (8-15 Ton)

Price Available Soon^*

ACE ALN 300

Engine

Cummins 123 HP
Bucket

1.7 m³
Weight

9970 kg
Fwd. Speed

40 km/h
Dump Height

NA
Tripping Load

NA

Small (8-15 Ton)

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

Liugong 838H MAX VS ACE ALN 300 Wheel Loader

Liugong 838H MAX

₹ 53-55 Lakhs

ACE ALN 300

Price Available Soon

Particulars	Liugong 838H MAX	ACE ALN 300

ACE ALN 300 vs Liugong 838H MAX: Which Wheel Loader Fits Your Work?

These two wheel loaders are built for different scales of work. The Liugong 838H MAX carries more engine power, a bigger bucket, and a higher payload, so it moves more material per pass on heavy-duty loading jobs. The ACE ALN 300 runs a smaller engine built for better fuel use, and its floating rear axle gives a smoother ride over rough or uneven ground.

If your work is heavy loading with big payloads every cycle, the Liugong's bigger bucket and higher capacity get through material faster. If your site has rough ground and running cost matters more than maximum payload, the ACE's lighter build and smoother ride suit that better. Compare the ACE wheel loader range and Liugong wheel loader range, browse all wheel loaders, or read the wheel loader buying guide to check bucket size against your job.

Liugong 838H MAX Wheel Loader

Pros:

Higher engine power at 160 HP which may lead to better performance
Larger bucket capacity of 2.4 m³ allows for more material to be moved per cycle
Higher payload (3850 kg) and tipping loads increases operational capacity
Turbocharged engine with air intercooler could enhance fuel efficiency

Cons:

Higher operating weight (12210 kg) may result in increased fuel consumption
Wider turning radius might reduce maneuverability in tighter spaces

ACE ALN 300 Wheel Loader

Pros:

Potentially more fuel-efficient with a lower power engine at 123 HP
Floating rear axle type could provide better traction and ride comfort
Higher top reverse speed (29.5 km/h) may improve cycle times in reversing operations

Cons:

Lower bucket capacity (1.7 m³) means less material moved per cycle
Some operational metrics like payload and tipping load are not provided
Some details such as overall length and maximum dumping height are missing

Closing Recommendation

The ACE ALN 300 and the Liugong 838H MAX both do good work as wheel loaders, but they fit different scales of job. The Liugong suits heavy-duty loading where a bigger bucket and higher payload keep the work moving fast. The ACE suits smaller sites and rough ground where fuel use and a smoother ride matter more than maximum capacity. So match the machine to your work: Liugong 838H MAX for heavy-duty, high-payload loading, ACE ALN 300 for lighter loading on rough or tight sites.