VENUS ULTRA 3.0
VS
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Self Loading Concrete Mixer
VENUS ULTRA 3.0 vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX: the two differ on 37 of 42 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (KOEL 74.5 HP vs KOEL 49 HP), Bucket Capacity (450 L vs 400 L), Fuel Tank (100 L vs 95 L), Drum Capacity (3.0 m³ vs 2.3 m³). The other 5 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Oct 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
VENUS ULTRA 3.0
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
VENUS ULTRA 3.0
VS
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Self Loading Concrete Mixer
VENUS ULTRA 3.0 vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX: the two differ on 37 of 42 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (KOEL 74.5 HP vs KOEL 49 HP), Bucket Capacity (450 L vs 400 L), Fuel Tank (100 L vs 95 L), Drum Capacity (3.0 m³ vs 2.3 m³). The other 5 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
VENUS ULTRA 3.0
₹ 38 – 40 Lakhs
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
₹ 30 – 32 Lakhs
Particulars
VENUS ULTRA 3.0
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs Venus Ultra 3.0: Which Self-Loading Mixer to Buy?
Both these machines load, mix and pour concrete on site. The Apollo Carmix 23 FX drives on all four wheels, has higher ground clearance for rough ground, and carries two water tanks for more water on board. The Venus Ultra 3.0 runs a more powerful engine, carries a bigger 3.0 m³ drum, and steers sideways with crab steering for tight spots.
If your sites are muddy, unmade or in rural areas with poor access, the Apollo Carmix 23 FX's 4-wheel drive and ground clearance help most. If you need more power, a bigger drum and the ability to shift sideways into a packed site, the Venus Ultra 3.0 fits better. See the full self-loading concrete mixer range, the Venus mixer range, or read our guide to concrete mixer types.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Pros:
Equipped with a highly efficient Kirloskar 4R810T engine with a max power of 49 HP at 2200 RPM
Features a 4 wheel drive and 3-way hydraulic steering for excellent maneuverability
Higher ground clearance of 385 mm suitable for rough terrains
Incorporates weighing technology with Load-Cell for precise aggregate loading
Larger water tank capacity with two tanks of 225 L each
Cons:
Less engine power compared to the VENUS ULTRA 3.0
Lower gradeability of 16° - 17°
Smaller drum capacity at 2.3 m³
Lower bucket capacity at 400 L
Lesser hydraulic tank capacity at 70 L
VENUS ULTRA 3.0 Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Pros:
Higher engine output with a KOEL 4R 1190 NA engine delivering 74.5 HP at 2200 RPM
Larger drum capacity of 3.0 m³ allowing for more concrete mix per cycle
Crab steering for better control and handling in tight spaces
Greater gradeability of 23°, which enhances its ability to climb steeper slopes
Larger hydraulic tank capacity of 100 L for better hydraulic system performance
Cons:
Lower ground clearance of 305 mm which might affect its off-road capabilities
Slightly slower maximum speed of 25 km/h compared to Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Heavier unladen weight of 6980 kg which may impact fuel efficiency
Lower water tank capacity compared to Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Bucket capacity, although larger than Apollo's, may still be insufficient for some operations
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both these self-loading mixers load, mix and pour concrete right on site, so the right pick depends on your ground conditions and how much power you need. The Apollo Carmix 23 FX drives on all four wheels, has higher ground clearance and carries more water, which suits rough terrain and precise aggregate loading. The Venus Ultra 3.0 runs more power, carries a bigger drum, and steers sideways for tight spots, which suits high-volume work with more site control. So match the machine to your work: Apollo Carmix 23 FX for rough or rural terrain, Venus Ultra 3.0 for high-volume work needing more power.
VENUS ULTRA 3.0 Vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX Self Loading Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Engineered for productivity, Venus Ultra 3.0 self-loading concrete mixer ensures accurate batching, strong durability, and seamless mobility for efficient, high-quality concrete production.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX self-loading concrete mixer ensures precise aggregate loading via hydraulically articulated shovel and ergonomic panel for efficient small-site operation.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs Venus Ultra 3.0: Which Self-Loading Mixer to Buy?
Both these machines load, mix and pour concrete on site. The Apollo Carmix 23 FX drives on all four wheels, has higher ground clearance for rough ground, and carries two water tanks for more water on board. The Venus Ultra 3.0 runs a more powerful engine, carries a bigger 3.0 m³ drum, and steers sideways with crab steering for tight spots.
If your sites are muddy, unmade or in rural areas with poor access, the Apollo Carmix 23 FX's 4-wheel drive and ground clearance help most. If you need more power, a bigger drum and the ability to shift sideways into a packed site, the Venus Ultra 3.0 fits better. See the full self-loading concrete mixer range, the Venus mixer range, or read our guide to concrete mixer types.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Pros:
Equipped with a highly efficient Kirloskar 4R810T engine with a max power of 49 HP at 2200 RPM
Features a 4 wheel drive and 3-way hydraulic steering for excellent maneuverability
Higher ground clearance of 385 mm suitable for rough terrains
Incorporates weighing technology with Load-Cell for precise aggregate loading
Larger water tank capacity with two tanks of 225 L each
Cons:
Less engine power compared to the VENUS ULTRA 3.0
Lower gradeability of 16° - 17°
Smaller drum capacity at 2.3 m³
Lower bucket capacity at 400 L
Lesser hydraulic tank capacity at 70 L
VENUS ULTRA 3.0 Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Pros:
Higher engine output with a KOEL 4R 1190 NA engine delivering 74.5 HP at 2200 RPM
Larger drum capacity of 3.0 m³ allowing for more concrete mix per cycle
Crab steering for better control and handling in tight spaces
Greater gradeability of 23°, which enhances its ability to climb steeper slopes
Larger hydraulic tank capacity of 100 L for better hydraulic system performance
Cons:
Lower ground clearance of 305 mm which might affect its off-road capabilities
Slightly slower maximum speed of 25 km/h compared to Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Heavier unladen weight of 6980 kg which may impact fuel efficiency
Lower water tank capacity compared to Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Bucket capacity, although larger than Apollo's, may still be insufficient for some operations
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both these self-loading mixers load, mix and pour concrete right on site, so the right pick depends on your ground conditions and how much power you need. The Apollo Carmix 23 FX drives on all four wheels, has higher ground clearance and carries more water, which suits rough terrain and precise aggregate loading. The Venus Ultra 3.0 runs more power, carries a bigger drum, and steers sideways for tight spots, which suits high-volume work with more site control. So match the machine to your work: Apollo Carmix 23 FX for rough or rural terrain, Venus Ultra 3.0 for high-volume work needing more power.
VENUS ULTRA 3.0 Vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX Self Loading Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Engineered for productivity, Venus Ultra 3.0 self-loading concrete mixer ensures accurate batching, strong durability, and seamless mobility for efficient, high-quality concrete production.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX self-loading concrete mixer ensures precise aggregate loading via hydraulically articulated shovel and ergonomic panel for efficient small-site operation.
37 differ · 5 identical
Key highlights: VENUS ULTRA 3.0 vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX Self Loading
VENUS ULTRA 3.0
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Engine Make
KOEL 4R 1190 NA
Kirloskar 4R810T
Fuel Tank
100 L
95 L
Hydraulic Tank
100 L
70 L
Bucket Capacity
450 L
400 L
Water Pump Capacity
300 L/min
NA
Drum Rotation Speed
0 to 20 rpm
0-18 rpm
Overall Length
6135 mm
6400 mm
Overall Width
2140 mm
2190 mm
Overall Height
2860 mm
3470 mm
Tyres
12/80 - 18 - 16 PR
12.5-20 PR 12
Key highlights: VENUS ULTRA 3.0 vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX Self Loading
VENUS ULTRA 3.0
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Engine Make
KOEL 4R 1190 NA
Kirloskar 4R810T
Fuel Tank
100 L
95 L
Hydraulic Tank
100 L
70 L
Bucket Capacity
450 L
400 L
Water Pump Capacity
300 L/min
NA
Drum Rotation Speed
0 to 20 rpm
0-18 rpm
Overall Length
6135 mm
6400 mm
Overall Width
2140 mm
2190 mm
Overall Height
2860 mm
3470 mm
Tyres
12/80 - 18 - 16 PR
12.5-20 PR 12
Full specifications: VENUS ULTRA 3.0 vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX Self Loading
Engine
VENUS ULTRA 3.0
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Engine Make
KOEL 4R 1190 NA
Kirloskar 4R810T
Engine Type
BS IV
BSV - Water cooled; Turbo Charged
Max. Power
74.5 HP (55.6 kW) @ 2200 RPM
49 HP (36.5 kW) @ 2200 RPM
Drive & Control
VENUS ULTRA 3.0
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Transmission Type
4-Wheel Drive Hydrostatic Transmission
Electric‑servo travel; 4WD/4WS reversible
Steering Type
Crab Steering
Hydraulic; 3-Way
Drive Type
4 Wheel Drive
4 Wheel Drive
Brake
Hydraulic service brakes on all wheels with emergency parking brake
Oil‑bath built‑in disc brakes
Max. Speed
25 km/h
27 km/h
Gradeability
23°
16° - 17°
Mixer
VENUS ULTRA 3.0
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Drum Capacity
3.0 m³
2.3 m³
Drum Slewing Degree
NA
NA
Drum Rotation Speed
0 to 20 rpm
0-18 rpm
Bucket Capacity
450 L
400 L
Fuel Tank
100 L
95 L
Water Tank Capacity
650 L
2 × 225 L
Water Pump Capacity
300 L/min
NA
Weight Unladen**
6980 kg
5600 kg
Weighing Technology
Hydrostatic Transducer
Load-Cell
Dimensions
VENUS ULTRA 3.0
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Overall Length
6135 mm
6400 mm
Overall Width
2140 mm
2190 mm
Overall Height
2860 mm
3470 mm
Tyres
12/80 - 18 - 16 PR
12.5-20 PR 12
Ground Clearance
305 mm
385 mm
Full specifications: VENUS ULTRA 3.0 vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX Self Loading
Engine
VENUS ULTRA 3.0
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Engine Make
KOEL 4R 1190 NA
Kirloskar 4R810T
Engine Type
BS IV
BSV - Water cooled; Turbo Charged
Max. Power
74.5 HP (55.6 kW) @ 2200 RPM
49 HP (36.5 kW) @ 2200 RPM
Drive & Control
VENUS ULTRA 3.0
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Transmission Type
4-Wheel Drive Hydrostatic Transmission
Electric‑servo travel; 4WD/4WS reversible
Steering Type
Crab Steering
Hydraulic; 3-Way
Drive Type
4 Wheel Drive
4 Wheel Drive
Brake
Hydraulic service brakes on all wheels with emergency parking brake
Questions buyers ask about the VENUS ULTRA 3.0 vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Ans.
The Venus Ultra 3.0 moves sideways more easily. Its crab steering lets all wheels turn together, so the machine can shift into a tight gap without a full turning circle.
Ans.
The Apollo Carmix 23 FX carries more water. Its two 225-litre tanks add up to 450 litres on board, more than the Venus Ultra 3.0, useful on sites far from a water source.
Ans.
The Apollo Carmix 23 FX uses Load-Cell weighing technology, a method known for accurate, repeatable readings batch after batch.
Ans.
The Apollo Carmix 23 FX is better suited to muddy or unmade ground. Its 4-wheel drive and higher ground clearance cope better with mud, ruts and rough access roads.
Ans.
The Venus Ultra 3.0 climbs steeper ramps. Its gradeability of 23° is higher than the Apollo Carmix 23 FX's 16 to 17°, useful when the drum is loaded and the ramp is steep.
Ans.
The Venus Ultra 3.0 needs fewer stops. Its bigger 100-litre hydraulic tank holds more than the Apollo Carmix 23 FX's 70 litres, so it can run longer on a busy working day.
VENUS ULTRA 3.0 Vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare VENUS ULTRA 3.0 Vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Dozer
41 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
