Apollo Carmix 23 FX
VS
MACONS MST 2
Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs MACONS MST 2: the two differ on 37 of 42 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (KOEL 49 HP vs KOEL 49.5 HP), Bucket Capacity (400 L vs 600 L), Fuel Tank (95 L vs 120 L), Drum Capacity (2.3 m³ vs 2 m³). The other 5 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
MACONS MST 2
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
VS
MACONS MST 2
Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs MACONS MST 2: the two differ on 37 of 42 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (KOEL 49 HP vs KOEL 49.5 HP), Bucket Capacity (400 L vs 600 L), Fuel Tank (95 L vs 120 L), Drum Capacity (2.3 m³ vs 2 m³). The other 5 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
₹ 30 – 32 Lakhs
MACONS MST 2
₹ 30 – 32 Lakhs
Particulars
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
MACONS MST 2
Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs MACONS MST 2: Which One to Buy?
Both machines load, mix and carry concrete on their own, without a separate loader standing by. The Apollo Carmix 23 FX carries a bigger drum, moves faster between pours, and has a dual water tank for steady mixing through the day. The MACONS MST 2 scoops a bigger bucket of raw material in one go and its drum can turn 180 degrees, so the driver can place concrete without moving the whole machine each time.
Think about how you load and where you pour. If your site needs faster movement between small pours and steady batch mixing, the Carmix 23 FX suits you. If you load a lot of raw material at once and need to place concrete at an angle, like near a wall or a trench, the drum-slewing MST 2 saves you time. Check how each machine measures its water-cement ratio with your dealer before you buy. See the full self-loading concrete mixer range or read our guide to concrete mixer types.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Pros:
Slightly higher gradeability (16° - 17°) for better slope climbing
Larger drum capacity (2.3 m³) for more concrete per load
Higher maximum speed (27 km/h) leading to faster on-site transit
Dual water tank system may provide better water management and mixing
Higher ground clearance (385 mm) could be advantageous on rough terrain
Cons:
Bucket capacity is smaller (400 L) leading to potential fewer materials per load
Does not include drum slewing capability compared to competitor
Unknown water pump capacity - could affect water intake efficiency
MACONS MST 2
Pros:
Greater bucket capacity (600 L) allowing for larger loads of raw materials
Features a drum slewing of 180° for flexible discharging
Higher gradeability (35%) enables better performance on steep slopes
Larger water tank (600 L) and higher water pump capacity (230 L/min) for potentially improved mixing
Electronic weighing technology might offer more precise measurements
Cons:
Lower maximum speed (21 km/h) which might slow on-site movement
Smaller drum capacity (2 m³) for concrete mixes compared to 23 FX
Slightly reduced ground clearance (355 mm) that could limit off-road capability
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both machines load and mix their own concrete, so the real choice is how you load material and where you place it. Choose the Apollo Carmix 23 FX when you want a bigger drum, faster travel between pours, and steady water supply for a full day's work. Choose the MACONS MST 2 when you load large amounts of material at once and need to angle the drum to place concrete in tight spots. So match the machine to your work: Apollo Carmix 23 FX for faster, bigger batch runs, MACONS MST 2 for big loads and tight-spot placement.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX Vs MACONS MST 2 Self Loading Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Apollo Carmix 23 FX self-loading concrete mixer ensures precise aggregate loading via hydraulically articulated shovel and ergonomic panel for efficient small-site operation.
Engineered compactly, the MACONS MST 2 Self-Loading Concrete Mixer delivers agile site mobility, efficient batching, and reliable mixing performance for constrained environments.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs MACONS MST 2: Which One to Buy?
Both machines load, mix and carry concrete on their own, without a separate loader standing by. The Apollo Carmix 23 FX carries a bigger drum, moves faster between pours, and has a dual water tank for steady mixing through the day. The MACONS MST 2 scoops a bigger bucket of raw material in one go and its drum can turn 180 degrees, so the driver can place concrete without moving the whole machine each time.
Think about how you load and where you pour. If your site needs faster movement between small pours and steady batch mixing, the Carmix 23 FX suits you. If you load a lot of raw material at once and need to place concrete at an angle, like near a wall or a trench, the drum-slewing MST 2 saves you time. Check how each machine measures its water-cement ratio with your dealer before you buy. See the full self-loading concrete mixer range or read our guide to concrete mixer types.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Pros:
Slightly higher gradeability (16° - 17°) for better slope climbing
Larger drum capacity (2.3 m³) for more concrete per load
Higher maximum speed (27 km/h) leading to faster on-site transit
Dual water tank system may provide better water management and mixing
Higher ground clearance (385 mm) could be advantageous on rough terrain
Cons:
Bucket capacity is smaller (400 L) leading to potential fewer materials per load
Does not include drum slewing capability compared to competitor
Unknown water pump capacity - could affect water intake efficiency
MACONS MST 2
Pros:
Greater bucket capacity (600 L) allowing for larger loads of raw materials
Features a drum slewing of 180° for flexible discharging
Higher gradeability (35%) enables better performance on steep slopes
Larger water tank (600 L) and higher water pump capacity (230 L/min) for potentially improved mixing
Electronic weighing technology might offer more precise measurements
Cons:
Lower maximum speed (21 km/h) which might slow on-site movement
Smaller drum capacity (2 m³) for concrete mixes compared to 23 FX
Slightly reduced ground clearance (355 mm) that could limit off-road capability
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both machines load and mix their own concrete, so the real choice is how you load material and where you place it. Choose the Apollo Carmix 23 FX when you want a bigger drum, faster travel between pours, and steady water supply for a full day's work. Choose the MACONS MST 2 when you load large amounts of material at once and need to angle the drum to place concrete in tight spots. So match the machine to your work: Apollo Carmix 23 FX for faster, bigger batch runs, MACONS MST 2 for big loads and tight-spot placement.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX Vs MACONS MST 2 Self Loading Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Apollo Carmix 23 FX self-loading concrete mixer ensures precise aggregate loading via hydraulically articulated shovel and ergonomic panel for efficient small-site operation.
Engineered compactly, the MACONS MST 2 Self-Loading Concrete Mixer delivers agile site mobility, efficient batching, and reliable mixing performance for constrained environments.
37 differ · 5 identical
Key highlights: Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs MACONS MST 2 Self Loading
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
MACONS MST 2
Engine Make
Kirloskar 4R810T
KOEL 4R810T
Fuel Tank
95 L
120 L
Hydraulic Tank
70 L
NA
Bucket Capacity
400 L
600 L
Water Pump Capacity
NA
230 L/min
Drum Rotation Speed
0-18 rpm
0 to 22 rpm
Overall Length
6400 mm
6550 mm
Overall Width
2190 mm
2130 mm
Overall Height
3470 mm
4070 mm
Tyres
12.5-20 PR 12
12.5/80-18 12 PR
Key highlights: Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs MACONS MST 2 Self Loading
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
MACONS MST 2
Engine Make
Kirloskar 4R810T
KOEL 4R810T
Fuel Tank
95 L
120 L
Hydraulic Tank
70 L
NA
Bucket Capacity
400 L
600 L
Water Pump Capacity
NA
230 L/min
Drum Rotation Speed
0-18 rpm
0 to 22 rpm
Overall Length
6400 mm
6550 mm
Overall Width
2190 mm
2130 mm
Overall Height
3470 mm
4070 mm
Tyres
12.5-20 PR 12
12.5/80-18 12 PR
Full specifications: Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs MACONS MST 2 Self Loading
Engine
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
MACONS MST 2
Engine Make
Kirloskar 4R810T
KOEL 4R810T
Engine Type
BSV - Water cooled; Turbo Charged
Diesel Engine 4 Cylinder Water Cooled
Max. Power
49 HP (36.5 kW) @ 2200 RPM
49.5 HP (36.9 kW) @ 2200 RPM
Drive & Control
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
MACONS MST 2
Transmission Type
Electric‑servo travel; 4WD/4WS reversible
Hydrostatics 4 Speed
Steering Type
Hydraulic; 3-Way
Power Assisted
Drive Type
4 Wheel Drive
4 Wheel Drive
Brake
Oil‑bath built‑in disc brakes
Electrical Parking Brake
Max. Speed
27 km/h
21 km/h
Gradeability
16° - 17°
35%
Mixer
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
MACONS MST 2
Drum Capacity
2.3 m³
2 m³
Drum Slewing Degree
NA
180°
Drum Rotation Speed
0-18 rpm
0 to 22 rpm
Bucket Capacity
400 L
600 L
Fuel Tank
95 L
120 L
Water Tank Capacity
2 × 225 L
600 L
Water Pump Capacity
NA
230 L/min
Weight Unladen**
5600 kg
5660 Kg
Weighing Technology
Load-Cell
Electronic
Dimensions
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
MACONS MST 2
Overall Length
6400 mm
6550 mm
Overall Width
2190 mm
2130 mm
Overall Height
3470 mm
4070 mm
Tyres
12.5-20 PR 12
12.5/80-18 12 PR
Ground Clearance
385 mm
355 mm
Full specifications: Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs MACONS MST 2 Self Loading
Questions buyers ask about the Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs MACONS MST 2
Ans.
The MACONS MST 2 is better for pouring near a wall or trench. Its drum turns 180 degrees, so the driver can point the chute where needed without backing the whole machine up and down. The Apollo Carmix 23 FX needs more open space to line up each pour.
Ans.
The MACONS MST 2 loads more raw material in one scoop. Its bucket holds more than the Apollo Carmix 23 FX's bucket, so it needs fewer trips to the material pile before each batch. The Carmix makes up for this with a bigger drum, so it still mixes more concrete per load overall.
Ans.
The Apollo Carmix 23 FX is easier to run on rough or sloped sites. It sits higher off the ground and climbs a steeper slope than the MACONS MST 2, so it is less likely to scrape or get stuck on an uneven approach road.
Ans.
They use different systems. The MACONS MST 2 uses electronic weighing to measure the mix, which can give a more exact reading. The Apollo Carmix 23 FX does not list its weighing method. Ask your dealer to show you how each machine checks and calibrates the mix on site.
Ans.
The MACONS MST 2 needs fewer water refills. It carries a bigger water tank and a stronger water pump than the Apollo Carmix 23 FX's dual-tank setup, so it can keep mixing for longer between stops.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX Vs MACONS MST 2 - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Apollo Carmix 23 FX Vs MACONS MST 2 price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
