Case CX220C VS CAT 320D3 GC Excavator

₹72 - 74 lakh^*

Case CX220C

Weight

21600 Kg
Bucket

0.94-1.2 m³
Dig. Depth

6650 mm
Engine

FPT 157 HP
Warranty

1 Year
Boom

5700 mm

Medium (15-25 Ton)

₹75 - 88 lakh^*

CAT 320D3 GC

Weight

19800 Kg
Bucket

0.92 m³
Dig. Depth

5970 mm
Engine

Ashoke Leyland 114 HP
Warranty

1 Year
Boom

5700 mm

Medium (15-25 Ton)

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

Case CX220C VS CAT 320D3 GC Excavator

Case CX220C

₹72 - 74 lakh

CAT 320D3 GC

₹75 - 88 lakh

Particulars	Case CX220C	CAT 320D3 GC

Case CX220C vs CAT 320D3 GC: Which One to Buy?

Both these excavators work in the same medium class, used for digging, loading and site clearing. The Case CX220C gives more engine power, a bigger bucket and a bigger fuel tank, so it moves more material in a day of heavy digging. The CAT 320D3 GC runs on less fuel per hour, is lighter, and comes with GPS and an AC cabin fitted as standard, with nothing extra to add.

Weight and standard fittings change daily life on site. The lighter CAT is easier to move between sites on a trailer and often needs a smaller permit. Standard GPS also helps if you plan to run more than one machine, since you do not pay extra to track it. Caterpillar's dealer network across India is large, which helps with parts and service almost anywhere, while Case dealers are fewer but well placed for heavy earthmoving regions. See the full Case excavator range, the CAT excavator range, all excavators, or read our guide to excavator uses.

Case CX220C Medium Excavator

Pros:

Higher engine power of 157 HP for potentially better performance
Bigger fuel tank capacity at 458 liters for longer operating times
Greater bucket capacity options ranging from 0.94 to 1.2 m³
Stronger bucket digging force of 152 kN for tougher digging conditions
Optional advanced features such as AC cabin and GPS
Longer undercarriage at 4180 mm which may provide better stability

Cons:

Higher fuel consumption at 12 L/hour
Heavier operating weight at 21600 Kg which might affect transportability

CAT 320D3 GC Medium Excavator

Pros:

More efficient fuel consumption between 11-13 L/hour
Standard inclusion of an AC cabin and GPS
Lighter operating weight at 19800 Kg which may improve transportability

Cons:

Lower engine power of 114 HP which may affect performance
Smaller bucket capacity of 0.92 m³
Lesser bucket digging force at 134 kN which may not handle tough conditions as easily as the Case model
Smaller fuel tank capacity of 350 liters could result in more frequent refueling

Closing Recommendation

Both these excavators handle medium digging and loading work well, so the choice comes down to power versus running cost. Choose the Case CX220C when your work needs more engine power, a bigger bucket and more fuel capacity for long, heavy-duty days. Choose the CAT 320D3 GC when you want lower fuel use, an easier machine to transport, and GPS and AC cabin fitted as standard with nothing extra to add. So match the machine to your work: Case CX220C for heavy-duty digging power, CAT 320D3 GC for lower running cost and easy transport.