Cat 966H vs Komatsu WA470-6A: the two differ on 73 of 85 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (Cat 281 HP vs Komatsu 273 HP), Max Torque (1299 Nm @ 1400 rpm vs NA), Operating Weight (23125 kg vs 22970 - 24290 kg), Weight (23125 kg vs 24290 kg). The other 12 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Oct 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Oct 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Cat 966H
Komatsu WA470-6A
Cat 966H
VS
Komatsu WA470-6A
Wheel Loader
Cat 966H vs Komatsu WA470-6A: the two differ on 73 of 85 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (Cat 281 HP vs Komatsu 273 HP), Max Torque (1299 Nm @ 1400 rpm vs NA), Operating Weight (23125 kg vs 22970 - 24290 kg), Weight (23125 kg vs 24290 kg). The other 12 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Oct 2026
Cat 966H
Price Available Soon
Komatsu WA470-6A
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Cat 966H
Komatsu WA470-6A
Cat 966H vs Komatsu WA470-6A: which wheel loader fits your quarry or mine?
Both are 23-tonne class loaders for hard, heavy loading, so the choice comes down to how you run your fleet. The Cat 966H has a 281 HP Cat C11 ACERT engine and a top forward speed of 37.4 km/h. That is quicker on long haul roads than the Komatsu's 36.2 km/h. It also has a slightly wider bucket, at 3,220 mm against 3,170 mm. The Komatsu WA470-6A has a 273 HP engine, a bigger 413-litre fuel tank, and higher hydraulic system pressure at 343 bar against 310 bar. Its ground clearance is 525 mm against 434 mm, which helps on rough, rocky floors. It also comes with KOMTRAX, which sends fuel use, working hours, location and service alerts to the fleet owner.
Buyers who stay with Caterpillar usually want the extra power and speed for hard faces and steep ramps. Buyers who prefer L&T Komatsu often care more about tracking, a bigger tank and bucket choices from 3.6 to 5.2 m³. The Cat is listed in medium wheel loaders of 15 to 30 ton. Not sure which size you need? Read the wheel loader guide first.
Cat 966H
Pros:
More engine power at 281 HP against 273 HP
Higher top forward speed at 37.4 km/h against 36.2 km/h
Cat C11 ACERT engine with 1299 Nm of torque at 1400 rpm
Slightly wider bucket at 3220 mm against 3170 mm
Planetary powershift transmission made for heavy loading
Cons:
Smaller 380-litre fuel tank against 413 litres
Lower hydraulic system pressure at 310 bar against 343 bar
Lower ground clearance at 434 mm against 525 mm
Product details here do not list a fleet tracking system
Komatsu WA470-6A
Pros:
Bigger 413-litre fuel tank for longer shifts
Higher hydraulic system pressure at 343 bar
Higher ground clearance at 525 mm for rough floors
KOMTRAX sends fuel, hours, location and service alerts to the owner
Wider bucket choice from 3.6 to 5.2 m³
Warranty listed as 1 year or 3,000 hours
Cons:
Less engine power at 273 HP against 281 HP
Slightly lower top forward speed at 36.2 km/h
Maximum torque is not listed in its product details
Narrower bucket width at 3170 mm
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
The Cat 966H suits drivers who load hard quarry faces and haul up steep ramps, where extra power and a bit more speed count. The Komatsu WA470-6A suits fleet owners who want KOMTRAX tracking, a bigger fuel tank and more ground clearance on rough floors. Ask each dealer for the current price and the exact warranty terms before you decide. So match the machine to your work: Cat 966H for hard-face loading with more power and speed, Komatsu WA470-6A for long shifts with tracking and a bigger tank.
Cat 966H Vs Komatsu WA470-6A Wheel Loader Price, Technical Specifications & Features
With robust design, the Cat 966H wheel loader excels in India’s heavy-duty construction and mining operations, enabling this wheel loader to deliver exceptional productivity in challenging environments.
The Komatsu WA470-6A wheel loader stands out in Indian mining and heavy-duty applications, providing unmatched productivity and reliability, enabling this wheel loader to excel in challenging work environments.
Cat 966H vs Komatsu WA470-6A: which wheel loader fits your quarry or mine?
Both are 23-tonne class loaders for hard, heavy loading, so the choice comes down to how you run your fleet. The Cat 966H has a 281 HP Cat C11 ACERT engine and a top forward speed of 37.4 km/h. That is quicker on long haul roads than the Komatsu's 36.2 km/h. It also has a slightly wider bucket, at 3,220 mm against 3,170 mm. The Komatsu WA470-6A has a 273 HP engine, a bigger 413-litre fuel tank, and higher hydraulic system pressure at 343 bar against 310 bar. Its ground clearance is 525 mm against 434 mm, which helps on rough, rocky floors. It also comes with KOMTRAX, which sends fuel use, working hours, location and service alerts to the fleet owner.
Buyers who stay with Caterpillar usually want the extra power and speed for hard faces and steep ramps. Buyers who prefer L&T Komatsu often care more about tracking, a bigger tank and bucket choices from 3.6 to 5.2 m³. The Cat is listed in medium wheel loaders of 15 to 30 ton. Not sure which size you need? Read the wheel loader guide first.
Cat 966H
Pros:
More engine power at 281 HP against 273 HP
Higher top forward speed at 37.4 km/h against 36.2 km/h
Cat C11 ACERT engine with 1299 Nm of torque at 1400 rpm
Slightly wider bucket at 3220 mm against 3170 mm
Planetary powershift transmission made for heavy loading
Cons:
Smaller 380-litre fuel tank against 413 litres
Lower hydraulic system pressure at 310 bar against 343 bar
Lower ground clearance at 434 mm against 525 mm
Product details here do not list a fleet tracking system
Komatsu WA470-6A
Pros:
Bigger 413-litre fuel tank for longer shifts
Higher hydraulic system pressure at 343 bar
Higher ground clearance at 525 mm for rough floors
KOMTRAX sends fuel, hours, location and service alerts to the owner
Wider bucket choice from 3.6 to 5.2 m³
Warranty listed as 1 year or 3,000 hours
Cons:
Less engine power at 273 HP against 281 HP
Slightly lower top forward speed at 36.2 km/h
Maximum torque is not listed in its product details
Narrower bucket width at 3170 mm
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
The Cat 966H suits drivers who load hard quarry faces and haul up steep ramps, where extra power and a bit more speed count. The Komatsu WA470-6A suits fleet owners who want KOMTRAX tracking, a bigger fuel tank and more ground clearance on rough floors. Ask each dealer for the current price and the exact warranty terms before you decide. So match the machine to your work: Cat 966H for hard-face loading with more power and speed, Komatsu WA470-6A for long shifts with tracking and a bigger tank.
Cat 966H Vs Komatsu WA470-6A Wheel Loader Price, Technical Specifications & Features
With robust design, the Cat 966H wheel loader excels in India’s heavy-duty construction and mining operations, enabling this wheel loader to deliver exceptional productivity in challenging environments.
The Komatsu WA470-6A wheel loader stands out in Indian mining and heavy-duty applications, providing unmatched productivity and reliability, enabling this wheel loader to excel in challenging work environments.
73 differ · 12 identical
Key highlights: Cat 966H vs Komatsu WA470-6A Wheel Loader
Cat 966H
Komatsu WA470-6A
Engine Make
Cat® C11 ACERT™
Komatsu SAA6D125E-5
Max Torque
1299 Nm @ 1400 rpm
NA
Fuel Tank
380 L
413 L
Hydraulic System
320 L/min
260 L/min
Min. Ground Clearance
434 mm
525 mm
Payload
NA
NA
Steering Angle
±40°
±35°
Drive Type
4-wheel drive (4WD)
4-wheel drive (4WD)
Wheelbase
3450 mm
3450 mm
Tyres
26.5-25 tires
23.5-25 / 26.5-25 tires
Max. Breakout Force
185 KN
192 kN
Overall Length
8693 mm
8825 mm
Warranty
1 Year
1 Yr. / 3000 hr.
AC Cabin
Standard
Optional
GPS
Standard
Standard
Key highlights: Cat 966H vs Komatsu WA470-6A Wheel Loader
Cat 966H
Komatsu WA470-6A
Engine Make
Cat® C11 ACERT™
Komatsu SAA6D125E-5
Max Torque
1299 Nm @ 1400 rpm
NA
Fuel Tank
380 L
413 L
Hydraulic System
320 L/min
260 L/min
Min. Ground Clearance
434 mm
525 mm
Payload
NA
NA
Steering Angle
±40°
±35°
Drive Type
4-wheel drive (4WD)
4-wheel drive (4WD)
Wheelbase
3450 mm
3450 mm
Tyres
26.5-25 tires
23.5-25 / 26.5-25 tires
Max. Breakout Force
185 KN
192 kN
Overall Length
8693 mm
8825 mm
Warranty
1 Year
1 Yr. / 3000 hr.
AC Cabin
Standard
Optional
GPS
Standard
Standard
Full specifications: Cat 966H vs Komatsu WA470-6A Wheel Loader
Questions buyers ask about the Cat 966H vs Komatsu WA470-6A
Ans.
The Cat 966H has more power, at 281 HP against 273 HP on the Komatsu WA470-6A. The Cat engine also has a slightly bigger displacement, at 11.1 litres against 11.04 litres.
Ans.
The Komatsu WA470-6A has the bigger tank, at 413 litres against 380 litres on the Cat 966H. That means fewer refuelling stops on a long shift at a remote site.
Ans.
The Cat 966H is a little faster. Its top forward speed is 37.4 km/h against 36.2 km/h on the Komatsu. In reverse the two are almost level, at 37.4 km/h and 37.3 km/h.
Ans.
The Komatsu WA470-6A sits higher, with 525 mm of ground clearance against 434 mm on the Cat. This is useful when the floor has loose rock or deep ruts.
Ans.
The Komatsu WA470-6A does, through KOMTRAX. It sends fuel use, working hours, location and service alerts to the fleet manager. The Cat product details here do not list a tracking system.
Ans.
The Cat 966H lists a 1 year warranty. The Komatsu WA470-6A lists 1 year or 3,000 hours. Ask the dealer for the exact terms and for the current price.
Cat 966H Vs Komatsu WA470-6A - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Cat 966H Vs Komatsu WA470-6A price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Dozer
41 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
