Tarle SLM 3000
VS
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Tarle SLM 3000 vs Apollo Carmix 30 FX: the two differ on 34 of 42 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (KOEL 74.5 HP vs M&M 74.5 HP), Bucket Capacity (450 L vs 400 L), Fuel Tank (100 L vs 130 L), Brand (Tarle Transit mixer vs Apollo Carmix Transit mixer). The other 8 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Tarle SLM 3000
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Tarle SLM 3000
VS
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Tarle SLM 3000 vs Apollo Carmix 30 FX: the two differ on 34 of 42 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (KOEL 74.5 HP vs M&M 74.5 HP), Bucket Capacity (450 L vs 400 L), Fuel Tank (100 L vs 130 L), Brand (Tarle Transit mixer vs Apollo Carmix Transit mixer). The other 8 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Tarle SLM 3000
₹ 34 – 36 Lakhs
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
₹ 37 – 40 Lakhs
Particulars
Tarle SLM 3000
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Apollo Carmix 30 FX vs Tarle SLM 3000: Which One to Buy?
Both are self loading concrete mixers built for the same size of job, so the choice comes down to how each one is driven and used on site. The Apollo Carmix 30 FX has hydraulic steering, which turns with less driver effort, and it can come with a reversing camera for safer backing up. The Tarle SLM 3000 has manual steering and a simpler build, but it moves a little faster and carries more water on board.
If your driver works long shifts, the Apollo Carmix 30 FX's easier steering and camera reduce fatigue and reversing accidents. If your site has climbs or rough patches and you want a simple, sturdy machine, the Tarle SLM 3000 handles that well. See the full self loading concrete mixer range or read our concrete mixer guide.
Tarle SLM 3000 - Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Pros:
Compact design suitable for medium jobs
4-wheel mechanical transmission
Higher maximum speed of 28 km/h
Better gradeability at 25°
Larger bucket capacity of 450 L
Higher unladen weight potentially means better stability
Cons:
Manual mechanical steering may require more effort
Smaller fuel tank capacity at 100 L
Water tank capacity lower than Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Lacks optional camera feature for operational ease
Apollo Carmix 30 FX - Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Pros:
Features hydraulic shuttered bucket and optional camera
Electric-servo travel transmission for smoother operation
Hydraulic, 3-way steering likely to reduce driver fatigue
Larger fuel tank capacity at 130 L
Dual water tank system with a combined capacity of 550 L
Cons:
Slightly slower maximum speed at 27 km/h
Lower gradeability between 16° - 17° may limit operation on steep terrain
Weighs less unladen, potentially affecting stability
Smaller bucket capacity at 400 L
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both mixers suit the same size of job, so pick on how they drive and where you work. Choose the Tarle SLM 3000 when your site has slopes or rough ground and you want a simple, sturdy machine. Choose the Apollo Carmix 30 FX when your driver does long shifts and you want easier steering plus a reversing camera for safety. So match the machine to your work: Tarle SLM 3000 for steep or rough sites, Apollo Carmix 30 FX for easier, safer daily driving.
Tarle SLM 3000 Vs Apollo Carmix 30 FX Self Loading Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Compact yet capable, the Tarle SLM 3000 features efficient mixing, tilt-drum batch control, and on-site batching autonomy for agile medium jobs.
Apollo Carmix 30 FX self-loading concrete mixer features double-helical drum, hydraulic shuttered bucket, and optional camera for enhanced mixing and operator comfort.
Apollo Carmix 30 FX vs Tarle SLM 3000: Which One to Buy?
Both are self loading concrete mixers built for the same size of job, so the choice comes down to how each one is driven and used on site. The Apollo Carmix 30 FX has hydraulic steering, which turns with less driver effort, and it can come with a reversing camera for safer backing up. The Tarle SLM 3000 has manual steering and a simpler build, but it moves a little faster and carries more water on board.
If your driver works long shifts, the Apollo Carmix 30 FX's easier steering and camera reduce fatigue and reversing accidents. If your site has climbs or rough patches and you want a simple, sturdy machine, the Tarle SLM 3000 handles that well. See the full self loading concrete mixer range or read our concrete mixer guide.
Tarle SLM 3000 - Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Pros:
Compact design suitable for medium jobs
4-wheel mechanical transmission
Higher maximum speed of 28 km/h
Better gradeability at 25°
Larger bucket capacity of 450 L
Higher unladen weight potentially means better stability
Cons:
Manual mechanical steering may require more effort
Smaller fuel tank capacity at 100 L
Water tank capacity lower than Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Lacks optional camera feature for operational ease
Apollo Carmix 30 FX - Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Pros:
Features hydraulic shuttered bucket and optional camera
Electric-servo travel transmission for smoother operation
Hydraulic, 3-way steering likely to reduce driver fatigue
Larger fuel tank capacity at 130 L
Dual water tank system with a combined capacity of 550 L
Cons:
Slightly slower maximum speed at 27 km/h
Lower gradeability between 16° - 17° may limit operation on steep terrain
Weighs less unladen, potentially affecting stability
Smaller bucket capacity at 400 L
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both mixers suit the same size of job, so pick on how they drive and where you work. Choose the Tarle SLM 3000 when your site has slopes or rough ground and you want a simple, sturdy machine. Choose the Apollo Carmix 30 FX when your driver does long shifts and you want easier steering plus a reversing camera for safety. So match the machine to your work: Tarle SLM 3000 for steep or rough sites, Apollo Carmix 30 FX for easier, safer daily driving.
Tarle SLM 3000 Vs Apollo Carmix 30 FX Self Loading Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Compact yet capable, the Tarle SLM 3000 features efficient mixing, tilt-drum batch control, and on-site batching autonomy for agile medium jobs.
Apollo Carmix 30 FX self-loading concrete mixer features double-helical drum, hydraulic shuttered bucket, and optional camera for enhanced mixing and operator comfort.
34 differ · 8 identical
Key highlights: Tarle SLM 3000 vs Apollo Carmix 30 FX Self Loading
Tarle SLM 3000
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Engine Make
KOEL 4R1040TC
M&M MCVNCS3170T4C5E
Fuel Tank
100 L
130 L
Hydraulic Tank
NA
70 L
Bucket Capacity
450 L
400 L
Water Pump Capacity
275 L/min
NA
Drum Rotation Speed
0 to 21 rpm
0-18 rpm
Overall Length
6200 mm
6710 mm
Overall Width
2230 mm
2190 mm
Overall Height
4300 mm
3625 mm
Tyres
12.5 - 18MT63 16PR HD
12.5-20 PR 12
Key highlights: Tarle SLM 3000 vs Apollo Carmix 30 FX Self Loading
Tarle SLM 3000
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Engine Make
KOEL 4R1040TC
M&M MCVNCS3170T4C5E
Fuel Tank
100 L
130 L
Hydraulic Tank
NA
70 L
Bucket Capacity
450 L
400 L
Water Pump Capacity
275 L/min
NA
Drum Rotation Speed
0 to 21 rpm
0-18 rpm
Overall Length
6200 mm
6710 mm
Overall Width
2230 mm
2190 mm
Overall Height
4300 mm
3625 mm
Tyres
12.5 - 18MT63 16PR HD
12.5-20 PR 12
Full specifications: Tarle SLM 3000 vs Apollo Carmix 30 FX Self Loading
Engine
Tarle SLM 3000
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Engine Make
KOEL 4R1040TC
M&M MCVNCS3170T4C5E
Engine Type
Turbocharged 4-cylinder diesel (BS IV); CRDI
Water Cooled; Turbo Charged
Max. Power
74.5 HP (55.6 kW) @ 2200 RPM
74.5 HP (55.6 kW) @ 2200 RPM
Drive & Control
Tarle SLM 3000
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Transmission Type
4WD with 4‑wheel mechanical transmission
Electric‑servo travel; 4WD/4WS reversible
Steering Type
Manual mechanical
Hydraulic; 3-Way
Drive Type
4 Wheel Drive
4 Wheel Drive
Brake
Fully-enclosed oil-bath disc brakes
Oil‑bath built‑in disc brakes
Max. Speed
28 km/h
27 km/h
Gradeability
25°
16° - 17°
Mixer
Tarle SLM 3000
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Drum Capacity
3.0 m³
3.0 m³
Drum Slewing Degree
NA
NA
Drum Rotation Speed
0 to 21 rpm
0-18 rpm
Bucket Capacity
450 L
400 L
Fuel Tank
100 L
130 L
Water Tank Capacity
600 L
2 × 275 L
Water Pump Capacity
275 L/min
NA
Weight Unladen**
7040 Kg
5900 kg
Weighing Technology
Electronic hydraulic pressure
Load-Cell
Dimensions
Tarle SLM 3000
Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Overall Length
6200 mm
6710 mm
Overall Width
2230 mm
2190 mm
Overall Height
4300 mm
3625 mm
Tyres
12.5 - 18MT63 16PR HD
12.5-20 PR 12
Ground Clearance
340 mm
385 mm
Full specifications: Tarle SLM 3000 vs Apollo Carmix 30 FX Self Loading
Questions buyers ask about the Tarle SLM 3000 vs Apollo Carmix 30 FX
Ans.
The Apollo Carmix 30 FX is less tiring to drive. Its hydraulic steering turns the wheel with less effort, which matters over a long shift. The Tarle SLM 3000 uses manual steering, so the driver works harder, especially when the drum is full and heavy.
Ans.
The Apollo Carmix 30 FX is safer when reversing because it can come with a camera that shows what is behind the machine. The Tarle SLM 3000 does not have this option, so the driver must rely fully on mirrors and a helper on the ground.
Ans.
The Apollo Carmix 30 FX carries more water on board with its dual tank setup. This means fewer stops to refill on sites far from a water source. The Tarle SLM 3000's single tank is smaller, so plan more refill trips on a big pour.
Ans.
The price of both mixers depends on the variant, attachments and your local dealer's offer at the time. Rather than a fixed number, check the current listed price on each mixer's own page and ask your dealer for the latest quote before you decide.
Ans.
The Tarle SLM 3000 climbs slopes a little better and its higher weight gives it a steady feel on rough ground. The Apollo Carmix 30 FX is better suited to flatter sites where its easier steering and camera matter more than climbing ability.
Tarle SLM 3000 Vs Apollo Carmix 30 FX - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Tarle SLM 3000 Vs Apollo Carmix 30 FX price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
