Tarle SLM 3000
VS
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Tarle SLM 3000 vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX: the two differ on 37 of 42 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (KOEL 74.5 HP vs KOEL 49 HP), Bucket Capacity (450 L vs 400 L), Fuel Tank (100 L vs 95 L), Drum Capacity (3.0 m³ vs 2.3 m³). The other 5 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Tarle SLM 3000
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Tarle SLM 3000
VS
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Tarle SLM 3000 vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX: the two differ on 37 of 42 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (KOEL 74.5 HP vs KOEL 49 HP), Bucket Capacity (450 L vs 400 L), Fuel Tank (100 L vs 95 L), Drum Capacity (3.0 m³ vs 2.3 m³). The other 5 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Tarle SLM 3000
₹ 34 – 36 Lakhs
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
₹ 30 – 32 Lakhs
Particulars
Tarle SLM 3000
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs Tarle SLM 3000: Which One to Buy?
Both these self-loading concrete mixers are built for on-site batching without a separate loader. The Apollo Carmix 23 FX has high ground clearance and hydraulic 3-way steering, so it handles rough or rocky sites and tight turns well, and it runs a water-cooled engine that helps it stay steady in long, hot working hours. The Tarle SLM 3000 has a bigger drum and more engine power, so it suits medium-sized jobs that need a larger batch each cycle.
If your site is rough, hilly or has tight turning spots, the Apollo Carmix 23 FX's ground clearance and steering make daily work easier. If you regularly pour medium-scale jobs and want more concrete per batch, the Tarle SLM 3000's bigger drum and gradeability suit that better. See the full self-loading mixer range or the concrete mixer guide for help picking the right size.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Pros:
Equipped with Kirloskar 4R810T engine optimized for efficiency
Features advanced electric-servo travel, enabling smoother transmission
Hydraulic 3-Way steering system improves maneuverability on tough terrains
Has a dual water tank system with a total capacity of 450 liters
Boasts of high ground clearance (385 mm) to overcome rough surfaces
Cons:
Lower engine power compared to Tarle SLM 3000 (49 HP)
Smaller drum capacity of 2.3 m³
Weighing technology based on Load-Cell which may be less advanced
Maximum speed slightly lesser than the Tarle SLM 3000 (27 km/h vs 28 km/h)
Tarle SLM 3000
Pros:
Higher engine power with KOEL 4R1040TC engine (74.5 HP)
Greater drum capacity of 3.0 m³, suitable for medium scale jobs
Excellent gradeability at 25° to handle steep inclines
Electronic hydraulic pressure weighing system for precise measurements
Faster maximum speed of 28 km/h enhances job site efficiency
Cons:
Manual steering may require more effort compared to hydraulic systems
Lower ground clearance than Apollo Carmix 23 FX (340 mm vs 385 mm)
Larger unladen weight could be less ideal for certain terrain (7040 Kg)
Lacks the engine cooling feature of water cooled that Apollo Carmix offers
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both machines load and mix their own concrete, but they fit different site conditions. Choose the Apollo Carmix 23 FX when your site is rough, hilly or needs tight turning, since its ground clearance and steering handle that well. Choose the Tarle SLM 3000 when your job is bigger and needs more power and drum capacity per batch. So match the machine to your work: Apollo Carmix 23 FX for rough, tight sites, Tarle SLM 3000 for larger, higher-output jobs.
Tarle SLM 3000 Vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX Self Loading Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Compact yet capable, the Tarle SLM 3000 features efficient mixing, tilt-drum batch control, and on-site batching autonomy for agile medium jobs.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX self-loading concrete mixer ensures precise aggregate loading via hydraulically articulated shovel and ergonomic panel for efficient small-site operation.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs Tarle SLM 3000: Which One to Buy?
Both these self-loading concrete mixers are built for on-site batching without a separate loader. The Apollo Carmix 23 FX has high ground clearance and hydraulic 3-way steering, so it handles rough or rocky sites and tight turns well, and it runs a water-cooled engine that helps it stay steady in long, hot working hours. The Tarle SLM 3000 has a bigger drum and more engine power, so it suits medium-sized jobs that need a larger batch each cycle.
If your site is rough, hilly or has tight turning spots, the Apollo Carmix 23 FX's ground clearance and steering make daily work easier. If you regularly pour medium-scale jobs and want more concrete per batch, the Tarle SLM 3000's bigger drum and gradeability suit that better. See the full self-loading mixer range or the concrete mixer guide for help picking the right size.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Pros:
Equipped with Kirloskar 4R810T engine optimized for efficiency
Features advanced electric-servo travel, enabling smoother transmission
Hydraulic 3-Way steering system improves maneuverability on tough terrains
Has a dual water tank system with a total capacity of 450 liters
Boasts of high ground clearance (385 mm) to overcome rough surfaces
Cons:
Lower engine power compared to Tarle SLM 3000 (49 HP)
Smaller drum capacity of 2.3 m³
Weighing technology based on Load-Cell which may be less advanced
Maximum speed slightly lesser than the Tarle SLM 3000 (27 km/h vs 28 km/h)
Tarle SLM 3000
Pros:
Higher engine power with KOEL 4R1040TC engine (74.5 HP)
Greater drum capacity of 3.0 m³, suitable for medium scale jobs
Excellent gradeability at 25° to handle steep inclines
Electronic hydraulic pressure weighing system for precise measurements
Faster maximum speed of 28 km/h enhances job site efficiency
Cons:
Manual steering may require more effort compared to hydraulic systems
Lower ground clearance than Apollo Carmix 23 FX (340 mm vs 385 mm)
Larger unladen weight could be less ideal for certain terrain (7040 Kg)
Lacks the engine cooling feature of water cooled that Apollo Carmix offers
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both machines load and mix their own concrete, but they fit different site conditions. Choose the Apollo Carmix 23 FX when your site is rough, hilly or needs tight turning, since its ground clearance and steering handle that well. Choose the Tarle SLM 3000 when your job is bigger and needs more power and drum capacity per batch. So match the machine to your work: Apollo Carmix 23 FX for rough, tight sites, Tarle SLM 3000 for larger, higher-output jobs.
Tarle SLM 3000 Vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX Self Loading Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Compact yet capable, the Tarle SLM 3000 features efficient mixing, tilt-drum batch control, and on-site batching autonomy for agile medium jobs.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX self-loading concrete mixer ensures precise aggregate loading via hydraulically articulated shovel and ergonomic panel for efficient small-site operation.
37 differ · 5 identical
Key highlights: Tarle SLM 3000 vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX Self Loading
Tarle SLM 3000
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Engine Make
KOEL 4R1040TC
Kirloskar 4R810T
Fuel Tank
100 L
95 L
Hydraulic Tank
NA
70 L
Bucket Capacity
450 L
400 L
Water Pump Capacity
275 L/min
NA
Drum Rotation Speed
0 to 21 rpm
0-18 rpm
Overall Length
6200 mm
6400 mm
Overall Width
2230 mm
2190 mm
Overall Height
4300 mm
3470 mm
Tyres
12.5 - 18MT63 16PR HD
12.5-20 PR 12
Key highlights: Tarle SLM 3000 vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX Self Loading
Tarle SLM 3000
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Engine Make
KOEL 4R1040TC
Kirloskar 4R810T
Fuel Tank
100 L
95 L
Hydraulic Tank
NA
70 L
Bucket Capacity
450 L
400 L
Water Pump Capacity
275 L/min
NA
Drum Rotation Speed
0 to 21 rpm
0-18 rpm
Overall Length
6200 mm
6400 mm
Overall Width
2230 mm
2190 mm
Overall Height
4300 mm
3470 mm
Tyres
12.5 - 18MT63 16PR HD
12.5-20 PR 12
Full specifications: Tarle SLM 3000 vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX Self Loading
Engine
Tarle SLM 3000
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Engine Make
KOEL 4R1040TC
Kirloskar 4R810T
Engine Type
Turbocharged 4-cylinder diesel (BS IV); CRDI
BSV - Water cooled; Turbo Charged
Max. Power
74.5 HP (55.6 kW) @ 2200 RPM
49 HP (36.5 kW) @ 2200 RPM
Drive & Control
Tarle SLM 3000
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Transmission Type
4WD with 4‑wheel mechanical transmission
Electric‑servo travel; 4WD/4WS reversible
Steering Type
Manual mechanical
Hydraulic; 3-Way
Drive Type
4 Wheel Drive
4 Wheel Drive
Brake
Fully-enclosed oil-bath disc brakes
Oil‑bath built‑in disc brakes
Max. Speed
28 km/h
27 km/h
Gradeability
25°
16° - 17°
Mixer
Tarle SLM 3000
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Drum Capacity
3.0 m³
2.3 m³
Drum Slewing Degree
NA
NA
Drum Rotation Speed
0 to 21 rpm
0-18 rpm
Bucket Capacity
450 L
400 L
Fuel Tank
100 L
95 L
Water Tank Capacity
600 L
2 × 225 L
Water Pump Capacity
275 L/min
NA
Weight Unladen**
7040 Kg
5600 kg
Weighing Technology
Electronic hydraulic pressure
Load-Cell
Dimensions
Tarle SLM 3000
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Overall Length
6200 mm
6400 mm
Overall Width
2230 mm
2190 mm
Overall Height
4300 mm
3470 mm
Tyres
12.5 - 18MT63 16PR HD
12.5-20 PR 12
Ground Clearance
340 mm
385 mm
Full specifications: Tarle SLM 3000 vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX Self Loading
Questions buyers ask about the Tarle SLM 3000 vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Ans.
The Apollo Carmix 23 FX is better for rough or rocky sites. It has higher ground clearance than the Tarle SLM 3000, so it is less likely to hit or scrape on uneven ground. Its hydraulic 3-way steering also makes it easier to turn on tight, broken tracks.
Ans.
Yes, a water-cooled engine usually runs steadier during long hours in hot weather. The Apollo Carmix 23 FX has this feature, which can help lower the chance of engine overheating on long summer shifts. The Tarle SLM 3000 does not list a water-cooled engine.
Ans.
The Tarle SLM 3000 handles steeper slopes better. Its gradeability rating is higher than the Apollo Carmix 23 FX's, so it can climb steeper approach roads or ramps without losing traction as easily.
Ans.
Not for most jobs, but it does need more driver effort than hydraulic steering, especially with a loaded drum. If your driver will be turning often in a tight yard all day, the Apollo Carmix 23 FX's hydraulic 3-way steering will feel less tiring over a full shift.
Ans.
The Tarle SLM 3000 suits medium-scale jobs better. Its larger drum capacity and higher engine power mean fewer batching cycles to pour the same volume of concrete compared to the Apollo Carmix 23 FX.
Tarle SLM 3000 Vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Tarle SLM 3000 Vs Apollo Carmix 23 FX price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
