Tarle SLM 3000
VS
Apollo Carmix 46 FX
Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Tarle SLM 3000 vs Apollo Carmix 46 FX: the two differ on 37 of 42 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (KOEL 74.5 HP vs M&M 112 HP), Bucket Capacity (450 L vs 600 L), Fuel Tank (100 L vs 130 L), Drum Capacity (3.0 m³ vs 4.6 m³). The other 5 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Tarle SLM 3000
Apollo Carmix 46 FX
Tarle SLM 3000
VS
Apollo Carmix 46 FX
Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Tarle SLM 3000 vs Apollo Carmix 46 FX: the two differ on 37 of 42 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (KOEL 74.5 HP vs M&M 112 HP), Bucket Capacity (450 L vs 600 L), Fuel Tank (100 L vs 130 L), Drum Capacity (3.0 m³ vs 4.6 m³). The other 5 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Tarle SLM 3000
₹ 34 – 36 Lakhs
Apollo Carmix 46 FX
₹ 42 – 46 Lakhs
Particulars
Tarle SLM 3000
Apollo Carmix 46 FX
Apollo Carmix 46 FX vs Tarle SLM 3000: Which One to Buy?
The Apollo Carmix 46 FX is the bigger, more powerful machine, while the Tarle SLM 3000 is more compact and easier to turn on a tight site. The Apollo runs a stronger 112 HP engine, carries an electronic weighing system for accurate concrete delivery, and has a larger 4.6 m³ drum with more fuel and water storage for long working days. The Tarle is shorter overall, so it turns more easily on cramped sites, and it climbs steeper ground with better gradeability.
Steering also differs: the Apollo uses hydraulic steering, which is lighter on the driver, while the Tarle relies on manual steering. If your jobs need big batches and long fuel runs, the Apollo's size and weighing system help. If your sites are tight or hilly and manoeuvring matters more than raw capacity, the Tarle's compact build and gradeability are the better fit. See the full self-loading mixer range or read our concrete mixer buying guide.
Apollo Carmix 46 FX
Pros:
Higher engine power of 112 HP for demanding tasks
Electronic weighing system for precision in concrete delivery
Larger drum capacity of 4.6 m³ suitable for high-capacity mixing
Greater fuel and water storage capacities for prolonged operation
Potentially less maneuverable in tight spaces due to longer overall length
Unladen weight is higher than Tarle SLM 3000, possibly affecting mobility on soft ground
Tarle SLM 3000
Pros:
More compact design with shorter overall length for better maneuverability
Higher gradeability makes it suitable for steep terrains
Higher maximum speed of 28 km/h may improve job site efficiency
More efficient water pump capacity at 275 L/min
Cons:
Lower engine power of 74.5 HP might result in lesser performance for heavy-duty tasks
Smaller drum and bucket capacity limits the volume of concrete mixed per batch
Manual steering compared to Apollo Carmix's hydraulic steering
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both these self-loading mixers get concrete mixed and poured on site, but they suit different jobs. Choose the Apollo Carmix 46 FX for larger projects where you need strong engine power, a bigger drum and an electronic weighing system for accurate batches. Choose the Tarle SLM 3000 when your site is tight on space or sits on hilly ground, since its compact size and gradeability make it easier to work with there. So match the machine to your work: Apollo Carmix 46 FX for large, high-volume jobs, Tarle SLM 3000 for tight or hilly sites.
Tarle SLM 3000 Vs Apollo Carmix 46 FX Self Loading Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Compact yet capable, the Tarle SLM 3000 features efficient mixing, tilt-drum batch control, and on-site batching autonomy for agile medium jobs.
Apollo Carmix 46 FX self-loading concrete mixer integrates electronic weighing system, 4×4 steering, and hydraulic discharge for high-capacity, precise concrete delivery.
Apollo Carmix 46 FX vs Tarle SLM 3000: Which One to Buy?
The Apollo Carmix 46 FX is the bigger, more powerful machine, while the Tarle SLM 3000 is more compact and easier to turn on a tight site. The Apollo runs a stronger 112 HP engine, carries an electronic weighing system for accurate concrete delivery, and has a larger 4.6 m³ drum with more fuel and water storage for long working days. The Tarle is shorter overall, so it turns more easily on cramped sites, and it climbs steeper ground with better gradeability.
Steering also differs: the Apollo uses hydraulic steering, which is lighter on the driver, while the Tarle relies on manual steering. If your jobs need big batches and long fuel runs, the Apollo's size and weighing system help. If your sites are tight or hilly and manoeuvring matters more than raw capacity, the Tarle's compact build and gradeability are the better fit. See the full self-loading mixer range or read our concrete mixer buying guide.
Apollo Carmix 46 FX
Pros:
Higher engine power of 112 HP for demanding tasks
Electronic weighing system for precision in concrete delivery
Larger drum capacity of 4.6 m³ suitable for high-capacity mixing
Greater fuel and water storage capacities for prolonged operation
Potentially less maneuverable in tight spaces due to longer overall length
Unladen weight is higher than Tarle SLM 3000, possibly affecting mobility on soft ground
Tarle SLM 3000
Pros:
More compact design with shorter overall length for better maneuverability
Higher gradeability makes it suitable for steep terrains
Higher maximum speed of 28 km/h may improve job site efficiency
More efficient water pump capacity at 275 L/min
Cons:
Lower engine power of 74.5 HP might result in lesser performance for heavy-duty tasks
Smaller drum and bucket capacity limits the volume of concrete mixed per batch
Manual steering compared to Apollo Carmix's hydraulic steering
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both these self-loading mixers get concrete mixed and poured on site, but they suit different jobs. Choose the Apollo Carmix 46 FX for larger projects where you need strong engine power, a bigger drum and an electronic weighing system for accurate batches. Choose the Tarle SLM 3000 when your site is tight on space or sits on hilly ground, since its compact size and gradeability make it easier to work with there. So match the machine to your work: Apollo Carmix 46 FX for large, high-volume jobs, Tarle SLM 3000 for tight or hilly sites.
Tarle SLM 3000 Vs Apollo Carmix 46 FX Self Loading Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Questions buyers ask about the Tarle SLM 3000 vs Apollo Carmix 46 FX
Ans.
The Apollo Carmix 46 FX gives more accurate delivery. Its electronic weighing system measures the batch as it mixes, so you get consistent concrete quality, which the Tarle SLM 3000 does not offer.
Ans.
The Tarle SLM 3000 is easier to manoeuvre. Its shorter overall length lets it turn and reposition in narrow lanes and cramped sites where the longer Apollo Carmix 46 FX needs more room.
Ans.
The Tarle SLM 3000 climbs better. It has higher gradeability than the Apollo Carmix 46 FX, so it is the more suitable pick for sites on slopes or hilly terrain.
Ans.
The Apollo Carmix 46 FX runs longer between refills. Its bigger fuel and water storage means fewer stops during a full working day compared to the Tarle SLM 3000.
Ans.
The Apollo Carmix 46 FX is easier on the driver. It uses hydraulic steering, which needs less effort than the Tarle SLM 3000's manual steering, especially over a long day of turning and reversing.
Tarle SLM 3000 Vs Apollo Carmix 46 FX - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Tarle SLM 3000 Vs Apollo Carmix 46 FX price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
