XCMG XS115H VS HAMM HC 119i Compactor

₹ 37-39 Lakhs^*

XCMG XS115H

Weight

11500 kg
Drum Width

2130 mm
Engine

Weichai 133 HP
Static Load

29.7 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

285/160 kN
Travel Speed

11.5 km/hr

Soil Compactor

₹ 35-37 Lakhs^*

HAMM HC 119i

Weight

11200 kg
Drum Width

2140 mm
Engine

Ashok Leyland 99.2 HP
Static Load

28.3 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

242/145 kN
Travel Speed

0–12.0 km/hr

Soil Compactor

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

XCMG XS115H VS HAMM HC 119i Compactor

XCMG XS115H

₹ 37-39 Lakhs

HAMM HC 119i

₹ 35-37 Lakhs

Particulars	XCMG XS115H	HAMM HC 119i

HAMM HC 119i vs XCMG XS115H: Which Soil Compactor Roller to Buy?

Both these are single-drum rollers used to compact soil on roads and large infrastructure projects. The HAMM HC 119i has an ECO mode that can cut fuel use when full power is not needed, plus a CEV Stage V engine and three-point articulation for stability on uneven ground. The XCMG XS115H offers two vibration frequency settings, so the driver can match the roller to different soil types on the same site.

HAMM is a long-established German brand widely used on large road and highway projects, while XCMG is a fast-growing Chinese brand with a wide model range across its India lineup. For a contractor working mixed soil types across a project, the XCMG's dual frequency setting adds flexibility. For a contractor who values fuel savings on long shifts and a stable machine on rough ground, the HAMM is worth the look. See the full HAMM compactor range, all compactors, or our compactor buying guide.

XCMG XS115H Soil Compactor Roller

Pros:

Slightly heavier operating weight allows for potentially better compaction
Dual vibration frequencies of 30 Hz and 35 Hz adapt to different soil types
Greater nominal amplitude in high setting for potentially better compaction
Higher centrifugal force in high setting for better compaction in tough conditions
Increased gradeability of 31% enhances performance on slopes

Cons:

Lower engine power at 99 kW compared to HAMM HC 119i's 74 kW
Smaller fuel tank capacity at 255 L
Thicker drum shell, which could suggest a heavier, less efficient design

Hamm HC 119i Soil Compactor Roller

Pros:

Features an ECO mode for better fuel efficiency
Three-point articulation for better stability and maneuverability
Advanced engine type with CEV Stage V compliance
Larger fuel tank at 270 L for extended operation
Improved visibility and intuitive controls for operator comfort

Cons:

Lower maximum gradeability at 30% compared to the XS115H's 31%
Slightly lighter operating weight which may affect compaction efficacy
Less centrifugal force in both high and low settings which could impact compaction in difficult conditions

Closing Recommendation

Both these single-drum rollers compact soil well on road and infrastructure projects. Choose the HAMM HC 119i when you want fuel savings on long shifts and a stable machine on uneven ground. Choose the XCMG XS115H when your site has mixed soil types and you want the flexibility of two vibration settings. So match the machine to your work: HAMM HC 119i for steady, fuel-conscious road work, XCMG XS115H for mixed soil conditions.