XCMG XS115H VS HAMM HC 119iD Compactor

₹ 37-39 Lakhs^*

XCMG XS115H

Weight

11500 kg
Drum Width

2130 mm
Engine

Weichai 133 HP
Static Load

29.7 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

285/160 kN
Travel Speed

11.5 km/hr

Soil Compactor

₹ 35-37 Lakhs^*

HAMM HC 119iD

Weight

11800 kg
Drum Width

2140 mm
Engine

Ashok Leyland 99.2 HP
Static Load

29.1 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

241/145 kN
Travel Speed

0–12.0 km/hr

Soil Compactor

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

XCMG XS115H VS HAMM HC 119iD Compactor

XCMG XS115H

₹ 37-39 Lakhs

HAMM HC 119iD

₹ 35-37 Lakhs

Particulars	XCMG XS115H	HAMM HC 119iD

HAMM HC 119iD vs XCMG XS115H: Which Roller to Buy?

Both the HAMM HC 119iD and the XCMG XS115H are large soil compactors built for big road and highway jobs, not small local patchwork. The HAMM sits in a higher weight class when fully loaded and adds an ECO mode that can cut fuel use on long shifts. The XCMG runs a full-hydraulic double-drive system with strong articulated steering, which helps it hold a straight line on wide open stretches.

For a fleet owner running many machines, the HAMM's optional telematics makes it easier to track hours and plan service from one place. For a contractor working on varied soil types, the XCMG's dual vibration frequencies give more control over how hard the drum pushes into the ground. Compare both in the full compactor range, see the HAMM compactor lineup, or read the compactor buying guide before you decide.

XCMG XS115H Soil Compactor Roller

Pros:

Operating weight of 11,500 kg provides strong compaction power
Dual vibration frequencies (30/35 Hz) adapt to different soil types
Maximum gradeability of 31% for slopes and rough terrain
Full-hydraulic double-drive propulsion system enhances maneuverability
Articulated steering with high steering and oscillation angles

Cons:

Turn radius not specified, potentially affecting maneuverability
Hydraulic tank capacity not listed, making it hard to assess hydraulic fluid requirements

Hamm HC 119iD Soil Compactor Roller

Pros:

Higher maximum operating weight of 13,360 kg for enhanced compaction
ECO mode and hydrostatic drive for improved efficiency and reduced fuel consumption
Gradeability of up to 53% superior to the XCMG model
Two-stage front drum vibration system for effective compaction
Optional telematics for fleet management and monitoring

Cons:

Lower base operating weight of 11,800 kg compared to XCMG
Drum shell thickness slightly less than XCMG which might affect durability

Closing Recommendation

Think about your project size and how you like to track your machines. The XCMG XS115H gives strong, flexible compaction with dual vibration settings for changing soil, at a solid mid weight class. The HAMM HC 119iD steps up in weight and adds ECO mode plus optional telematics, which helps on bigger jobs and larger fleets. So match the machine to your work: XCMG XS115H for flexible compaction across mixed soil, HAMM HC 119iD for heavier road work and fleet tracking.