ACE AG 176 VS Komatsu GD535-6 Motor Grader

₹ 74-76 Lakhs^*

ACE AG 176

Engine

Ashok Leyland 180 HP
Blade

3650 mm
Weight

15000 kg
Turning Radius

7800 mm
Max Forward Speed

36 km/hr
Max Reverse Speed

22 km/hr

Medium (12-20 Ton)

₹ 84 - 86 lakhs^*

Komatsu GD535-6

Engine

Komatsu 148 HP
Blade

3710 mm
Weight

15040 kg
Turning Radius

7000 mm
Max Forward Speed

43.0 km/hr
Max Reverse Speed

3.9 km/hr

Medium (12-20 Ton)

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before macking any final decision.

Key Highlights	ACE AG 176	Komatsu GD535-6

ACE AG 176 VS Komatsu GD535-6 Motor Grader

ACE AG 176

₹ 74-76 Lakhs

Komatsu GD535-6

₹ 84 - 86 lakhs

Particulars	ACE AG 176	Komatsu GD535-6

Overview Summary

The ACE AG 176 Motor Grader boasts a powerful Ashok Leyland 180 HP engine, superior forward speed, and a standard AC cabin, making it desirable for comfort and power. In contrast, the Komatsu GD535-6 provides slightly better blade length, faster maximum forward speed, an impressive steering angle, and comes with a standard GPS, which may enhance precision and productivity despite having a less powerful engine.

ACE AG 176 Motor Grader

Pros:

Powered by an Ashok Leyland 180 HP engine providing a strong power output
Has a blade length of 3650 mm suitable for effective grading
Offers a higher maximum forward speed of 36 km/hr allowing for quicker operation
Equipped with front axle lean type providing superior control
Comes with a torque converter and powershift transmission for smooth operation
Standard AC cabin for operator comfort
Impressive minimum turning radius of 7800 mm for better maneuverability

Cons:

No GPS available for precision guidance
Blade down pressure is slightly lower compared to Komatsu GD535-6

Komatsu GD535-6 Motor Grader

Pros:

Features a turbocharged and air to air aftercooled engine for efficient performance
Slightly longer blade length of 3710 mm which may improve grading accuracy
Faster maximum forward speed of 43.0 km/hr for increased productivity
Superior steering angle of 49° enhances tight turn capability
Hydraulic power steering and footprint engine steering compliant with IS0 5010
GPS standard included for advanced tracking and guidance
Higher ground clearance of 600 mm could be advantageous in rough terrains

Cons:

The engine has less horsepower (148 HP) compared to the ACE AG 176
Lacks an AC cabin which might affect operator comfort during extended use
Blade down pressure is marginally lower than the ACE AG 176

Closing Recommendation

Choosing between the ACE AG 176 and Komatsu GD535-6 depends on what aspects are prioritized. If power and operator comfort are a priority, the ACE AG 176 could be the better choice. However, for those who value precision guidance, faster operation, and better overall maneuverability, the Komatsu GD535-6 may be more suitable. Both graders offer significant capabilities, and the final decision should be based on the most critical requirements for the intended usage and environment.