Apollo Carmix 23 FX
VS
VENUS ULTRA 2.0
Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs VENUS ULTRA 2.0: the two differ on 37 of 42 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (KOEL 49 HP vs KOEL 49.5 HP), Bucket Capacity (400 L vs 375 L), Fuel Tank (95 L vs 70 L), Drum Capacity (2.3 m³ vs 2.0 m³). The other 5 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
VENUS ULTRA 2.0
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
VS
VENUS ULTRA 2.0
Self Loading Concrete Mixer
Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs VENUS ULTRA 2.0: the two differ on 37 of 42 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (KOEL 49 HP vs KOEL 49.5 HP), Bucket Capacity (400 L vs 375 L), Fuel Tank (95 L vs 70 L), Drum Capacity (2.3 m³ vs 2.0 m³). The other 5 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
₹ 30 – 32 Lakhs
VENUS ULTRA 2.0
₹ 32 – 34 Lakhs
Particulars
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
VENUS ULTRA 2.0
Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs VENUS ULTRA 2.0: Which Self-Loading Mixer Wins for Your Site?
Ground condition is the real difference here. The Apollo Carmix 23 FX has 385 mm of ground clearance, so it copes better with rough, rutted, or muddy approach roads on a raw site. The VENUS ULTRA 2.0 uses crab steering, which lets it move sideways into a tight gap instead of swinging through a full turn, so it suits paved or built-up sites with less room to move.
Slope also matters. The VENUS ULTRA 2.0 has a higher gradeability rating, so it holds its footing better on an inclined site, while the Apollo Carmix 23 FX runs a bit faster between mixing points thanks to its higher top speed and carries more fuel for a longer work day. Compare the full Venus mixer range, browse all self-loading concrete mixers, or read our concrete mixer buying guide to compare more models.
VENUS ULTRA 2.0
Pros:
Hydrostatic transmission offers smooth operation
Crab steering enables better maneuverability
Higher gradeability at 23° suitable for inclined surfaces
Larger water tank capacity of 400 L
Higher drum rotation speed up to 22 rpm
Hydrostatic transducer weighing technology
Cons:
Smaller drum capacity at 2.0 m³
Lower fuel tank capacity at 70 L
Less ground clearance at 295 mm
Smaller bucket capacity at 375 L
Lower maximum speed at 22 km/h
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Pros:
Higher drum capacity at 2.3 m³
Hydraulically articulated shovel for precise loading
Larger fuel tank at 95 L
Better ground clearance at 385 mm
Higher maximum speed at 27 km/h
Load-cell weighing technology
Cons:
Lower drum rotation speed at 0-18 rpm
Smaller gradeability range of 16° - 17°
Hydraulic tank capacity lower at 70 L
Three-way steering may offer less flexibility than crab steering
Dual water tank setup may be less preferred by some operators
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both these self-loading mixers are built for similar-sized jobs, so site condition should guide your choice. Pick the Apollo Carmix 23 FX if your site has rough, uneven, or muddy access roads, since its higher ground clearance and bigger fuel tank keep it working longer without a break. Pick the VENUS ULTRA 2.0 if you work on paved or built-up sites with tight corners or slopes, since its crab steering and higher gradeability make it easier to place and hold its footing. So match the machine to your work: Apollo Carmix 23 FX for rough or muddy ground, VENUS ULTRA 2.0 for tight, sloped, or built-up sites.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX Vs VENUS ULTRA 2.0 Self Loading Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Apollo Carmix 23 FX self-loading concrete mixer ensures precise aggregate loading via hydraulically articulated shovel and ergonomic panel for efficient small-site operation.
Venus Ultra 2.0 self-loading concrete mixer combines precision mixing, compact maneuverability, and robust build for dependable performance in varied construction site conditions.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs VENUS ULTRA 2.0: Which Self-Loading Mixer Wins for Your Site?
Ground condition is the real difference here. The Apollo Carmix 23 FX has 385 mm of ground clearance, so it copes better with rough, rutted, or muddy approach roads on a raw site. The VENUS ULTRA 2.0 uses crab steering, which lets it move sideways into a tight gap instead of swinging through a full turn, so it suits paved or built-up sites with less room to move.
Slope also matters. The VENUS ULTRA 2.0 has a higher gradeability rating, so it holds its footing better on an inclined site, while the Apollo Carmix 23 FX runs a bit faster between mixing points thanks to its higher top speed and carries more fuel for a longer work day. Compare the full Venus mixer range, browse all self-loading concrete mixers, or read our concrete mixer buying guide to compare more models.
VENUS ULTRA 2.0
Pros:
Hydrostatic transmission offers smooth operation
Crab steering enables better maneuverability
Higher gradeability at 23° suitable for inclined surfaces
Larger water tank capacity of 400 L
Higher drum rotation speed up to 22 rpm
Hydrostatic transducer weighing technology
Cons:
Smaller drum capacity at 2.0 m³
Lower fuel tank capacity at 70 L
Less ground clearance at 295 mm
Smaller bucket capacity at 375 L
Lower maximum speed at 22 km/h
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
Pros:
Higher drum capacity at 2.3 m³
Hydraulically articulated shovel for precise loading
Larger fuel tank at 95 L
Better ground clearance at 385 mm
Higher maximum speed at 27 km/h
Load-cell weighing technology
Cons:
Lower drum rotation speed at 0-18 rpm
Smaller gradeability range of 16° - 17°
Hydraulic tank capacity lower at 70 L
Three-way steering may offer less flexibility than crab steering
Dual water tank setup may be less preferred by some operators
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both these self-loading mixers are built for similar-sized jobs, so site condition should guide your choice. Pick the Apollo Carmix 23 FX if your site has rough, uneven, or muddy access roads, since its higher ground clearance and bigger fuel tank keep it working longer without a break. Pick the VENUS ULTRA 2.0 if you work on paved or built-up sites with tight corners or slopes, since its crab steering and higher gradeability make it easier to place and hold its footing. So match the machine to your work: Apollo Carmix 23 FX for rough or muddy ground, VENUS ULTRA 2.0 for tight, sloped, or built-up sites.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX Vs VENUS ULTRA 2.0 Self Loading Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Apollo Carmix 23 FX self-loading concrete mixer ensures precise aggregate loading via hydraulically articulated shovel and ergonomic panel for efficient small-site operation.
Venus Ultra 2.0 self-loading concrete mixer combines precision mixing, compact maneuverability, and robust build for dependable performance in varied construction site conditions.
37 differ · 5 identical
Key highlights: Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs VENUS ULTRA 2.0 Self Loading
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
VENUS ULTRA 2.0
Engine Make
Kirloskar 4R810T
KOEL 4R 810 NA BSIII
Fuel Tank
95 L
70 L
Hydraulic Tank
70 L
90 L
Bucket Capacity
400 L
375 L
Water Pump Capacity
NA
300 L/min
Drum Rotation Speed
0-18 rpm
0 to 22 rpm
Overall Length
6400 mm
6080 mm
Overall Width
2190 mm
2065 mm
Overall Height
3470 mm
3295 mm
Tyres
12.5-20 PR 12
12/75 - 18 - 12 PR
Key highlights: Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs VENUS ULTRA 2.0 Self Loading
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
VENUS ULTRA 2.0
Engine Make
Kirloskar 4R810T
KOEL 4R 810 NA BSIII
Fuel Tank
95 L
70 L
Hydraulic Tank
70 L
90 L
Bucket Capacity
400 L
375 L
Water Pump Capacity
NA
300 L/min
Drum Rotation Speed
0-18 rpm
0 to 22 rpm
Overall Length
6400 mm
6080 mm
Overall Width
2190 mm
2065 mm
Overall Height
3470 mm
3295 mm
Tyres
12.5-20 PR 12
12/75 - 18 - 12 PR
Full specifications: Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs VENUS ULTRA 2.0 Self Loading
Engine
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
VENUS ULTRA 2.0
Engine Make
Kirloskar 4R810T
KOEL 4R 810 NA BSIII
Engine Type
BSV - Water cooled; Turbo Charged
BS-III
Max. Power
49 HP (36.5 kW) @ 2200 RPM
49.5 HP (36.5 kW) @ 2200 RPM
Drive & Control
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
VENUS ULTRA 2.0
Transmission Type
Electric‑servo travel; 4WD/4WS reversible
4-Wheel Drive Hydrostatic Transmission
Steering Type
Hydraulic; 3-Way
Crab Steering
Drive Type
4 Wheel Drive
4 Wheel Drive
Brake
Oil‑bath built‑in disc brakes
Hydraulic service brakes on all wheels with emergency parking brake
Max. Speed
27 km/h
22 km/h
Gradeability
16° - 17°
23°
Mixer
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
VENUS ULTRA 2.0
Drum Capacity
2.3 m³
2.0 m³
Drum Slewing Degree
NA
NA
Drum Rotation Speed
0-18 rpm
0 to 22 rpm
Bucket Capacity
400 L
375 L
Fuel Tank
95 L
70 L
Water Tank Capacity
2 × 225 L
400 L
Water Pump Capacity
NA
300 L/min
Weight Unladen**
5600 kg
5540 kg
Weighing Technology
Load-Cell
Hydrostatic Transducer
Dimensions
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
VENUS ULTRA 2.0
Overall Length
6400 mm
6080 mm
Overall Width
2190 mm
2065 mm
Overall Height
3470 mm
3295 mm
Tyres
12.5-20 PR 12
12/75 - 18 - 12 PR
Ground Clearance
385 mm
295 mm
Full specifications: Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs VENUS ULTRA 2.0 Self Loading
Engine
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
VENUS ULTRA 2.0
Engine Make
Kirloskar 4R810T
KOEL 4R 810 NA BSIII
Engine Type
BSV - Water cooled; Turbo Charged
BS-III
Max. Power
49 HP (36.5 kW) @ 2200 RPM
49.5 HP (36.5 kW) @ 2200 RPM
Drive & Control
Apollo Carmix 23 FX
VENUS ULTRA 2.0
Transmission Type
Electric‑servo travel; 4WD/4WS reversible
4-Wheel Drive Hydrostatic Transmission
Steering Type
Hydraulic; 3-Way
Crab Steering
Drive Type
4 Wheel Drive
4 Wheel Drive
Brake
Oil‑bath built‑in disc brakes
Hydraulic service brakes on all wheels with emergency parking brake
Questions buyers ask about the Apollo Carmix 23 FX vs VENUS ULTRA 2.0
Ans.
The Apollo Carmix 23 FX handles rough ground better. Its higher ground clearance keeps the underside clear of ruts and bumps that a lower machine might scrape on.
Ans.
The VENUS ULTRA 2.0 is easier to park in tight spots. Its crab steering lets the wheels turn sideways, so it can slide into a gap instead of swinging through a wide arc.
Ans.
The VENUS ULTRA 2.0 works better on slopes. It has a higher gradeability rating than the Apollo Carmix 23 FX, so it keeps its grip on steeper ground.
Ans.
The Apollo Carmix 23 FX mixes a bigger batch. Its drum capacity is a little larger than the VENUS ULTRA 2.0's, so it delivers more concrete per load.
Ans.
Yes, its hydraulically articulated shovel gives more control while scooping material, which helps when you need a steady mix ratio batch after batch.
Ans.
The Apollo Carmix 23 FX needs fewer fuel stops. Its fuel tank holds more than the VENUS ULTRA 2.0's, so it runs longer between fill-ups.
Apollo Carmix 23 FX Vs VENUS ULTRA 2.0 - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Apollo Carmix 23 FX Vs VENUS ULTRA 2.0 price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
