CASE 770 EX Plus VS Mahindra SX IV Backhoe Loader

₹ 27-34 Lakhs^*

CASE 770 EX Plus

Engine

Ashok Leyland 74 HP
Bucket

0.30 m³
Shovel

1.1 m³
Dig. Depth

4700 mm
Dump Height

2730 mm
Weight

7955 Kg

2WD/4WD

₹ 31-33 Lakhs^*

Mahindra SX IV

Engine

Mahindra 74 HP
Bucket

0.27 m³
Shovel

1.1 m³
Dig. Depth

4959 mm
Dump Height

2708 mm
Weight

7430 Kg

2WD

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

CASE 770 EX Plus VS Mahindra SX IV Backhoe Loader

CASE 770 EX Plus

₹ 27-34 Lakhs

Mahindra SX IV

₹ 31-33 Lakhs

Particulars	CASE 770 EX Plus	Mahindra SX IV

CASE 770 EX Plus vs Mahindra EarthMaster SX IV: Which Backhoe Loader to Pick?

Digging force and fuel tank size only tell part of the story on a backhoe loader. Who can service the machine near your site, and how the two brands are viewed in the used market, matter just as much for day-to-day ownership. The CASE 770 EX Plus comes from a global brand with a strong presence in Indian construction. The Mahindra EarthMaster SX IV comes from a domestic brand with one of the widest dealer networks across rural and small-town India.

A contractor working on tougher, harder ground may lean toward the CASE for its stronger digging force. An owner-operator who values a familiar local brand and nearby service may prefer the Mahindra. Check CASE or Mahindra dealer reach near you, or see the full range of backhoe loaders on the category page.

CASE 770 EX Plus Backhoe Loader

Pros:

Higher lifting capacity and breakout force
Advanced engine technology: Tier 4B/ CEV BS-IV; Turbocharged Intercooled; Electronic; Common Rail Direct Injection
Strong bucket digging force (5616 kgf) and shovel breakout force (6250 kgf)
Higher engine displacement (3.84 L) for potentially better performance
Higher engine coolant capacity (20 L) and hydraulic system capacity (107 L) implies potentially better system cooling and hydraulic operations
Greater bucket rotation angle (204°)

Cons:

Less fuel-efficient than the Mahindra with a smaller fuel tank (129 L vs 140 L)
Lower maximum torque (340 Nm vs 345 Nm)
Lesser reverse gears speed
Slightly heavier machine weight which could impact fuel efficiency and maneuverability

Mahindra EarthMaster SX IV Backhoe Loader

Pros:

Slightly higher maximum torque (345 Nm)
Greater maximum speed (38.37 km/hr vs 35 km/hr), indicating faster operations on site
Larger fuel tank (140 L) for potentially longer operation times between refuels
Possibly more fuel-efficient due to the smaller engine displacement (3.5 L vs 3.84 L)
Higher hydraulic system pressure (253 bar vs 210 bar), which may result in more powerful operations

Cons:

Lower bucket digging force (5199 kgf) and lower shovel breakout force (6243 kgf) compared to CASE 770 EX Plus
Smaller engine displacement could indicate less raw power
Smaller standard bucket capacity (0.27 m³ vs 0.30 m³)
Smaller hydraulic tank capacity (50 L vs 80 L) which might affect hydraulic system performance

Closing Recommendation

Both are strong backhoe loaders built for general construction work. Choose the CASE 770 EX Plus when you need more digging and breakout force for tougher ground. Choose the Mahindra EarthMaster SX IV when you want a bigger fuel tank, higher travel speed and a wide local dealer network. So match the machine to your work: CASE 770 EX Plus for tougher digging, Mahindra EarthMaster SX IV for longer runtime and nearby service.