Kobelco SK220 VS Liugong 922Ea (Alpha) Excavator

₹ 65-70 Lakhs^*

Kobelco SK220

Weight

20600 Kg
Bucket

0.8 - 0.93 m³
Dig. Depth

6160 mm
Engine

HINO 158 HP
Warranty

1 Yr. / 2500 hr.
Boom

5650 mm

Medium (15-25 Ton)

₹ 62-64 Lakhs^*

Liugong 922Ea (Alpha)

Weight

21700 Kg
Bucket

0.95 m³
Dig. Depth

6098 mm
Engine

Cummins 140 HP
Warranty

1 Yr. / 2500 hr.
Boom

5710 mm

Medium (15-25 Ton)

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before macking any final decision.

Key Highlights	Kobelco SK220	Liugong 922Ea (Alpha)

Kobelco SK220 VS Liugong 922Ea (Alpha) Excavator

Kobelco SK220

₹ 65-70 Lakhs

Liugong 922Ea (Alpha)

₹ 62-64 Lakhs

Particulars	Kobelco SK220	Liugong 922Ea (Alpha)

Overview Summary

The Kobelco SK220 and Liugong 922Ea (Alpha) are two medium excavators designed for demanding construction and excavation tasks. The Kobelco SK220 offers a higher engine power and a brand known for reliability, while the Liugong 922Ea (Alpha) has a slightly larger bucket capacity and a more powerful digging force.

Kobelco SK220 Medium Excavator

Pros:

Higher engine power of 158 HP for performance-intensive tasks.
Equipped with a standard AC cabin and GPS for operator comfort and equipment tracking.
Boasts a bucket digging force of 143 kN indicating strong digging capacity.
Benefits from Kobelco's brand reliability in heavy-duty construction.

Cons:

Smaller bucket capacity range of 0.8 - 0.93 m³ compared to Liugong 922Ea.
Specifications for top and bottom rollers, alternator, and battery are not provided.

Liugong 922Ea (Alpha) Medium Excavator

Pros:

Slightly larger standard bucket capacity of 0.95 m³ may increase operational efficiency.
GPS is optional, allowing customization based on user preference or budget.
Greater undercarriage length could potentially provide better stability.
Higher bucket digging force of 158 kN can lead to more effective soil penetration.

Cons:

Engine power is slightly less at 140 HP, which may affect heavy-duty performance.
Details about alternator and battery specifications are missing.
Travel speed specifications are not specified, which affects the assessment of maneuverability.

Closing Recommendation

Choosing between the Kobelco SK220 and Liugong 922Ea (Alpha) should be based on specific needs. The Kobelco SK220 may be suitable for tasks requiring more engine power, while the Liugong 922Ea (Alpha) might be preferable for projects that can benefit from its larger bucket capacity and superior digging force. Evaluate the importance of GPS, travel speed, and stability for your operation before making a decision.