JOHN SLCM 2.2
VS
MACONS MST 2
Self Loading Concrete Mixer
JOHN SLCM 2.2 vs MACONS MST 2: the two differ on 33 of 42 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (KOEL 49 HP vs KOEL 49.5 HP), Bucket Capacity (350 L vs 600 L), Fuel Tank (65 L vs 120 L), Drum Capacity (2.2 m³ vs 2 m³). The other 9 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
JOHN SLCM 2.2
MACONS MST 2
JOHN SLCM 2.2
VS
MACONS MST 2
Self Loading Concrete Mixer
JOHN SLCM 2.2 vs MACONS MST 2: the two differ on 33 of 42 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (KOEL 49 HP vs KOEL 49.5 HP), Bucket Capacity (350 L vs 600 L), Fuel Tank (65 L vs 120 L), Drum Capacity (2.2 m³ vs 2 m³). The other 9 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
JOHN SLCM 2.2
₹ 32 – 34 Lakhs
MACONS MST 2
₹ 30 – 32 Lakhs
Particulars
JOHN SLCM 2.2
MACONS MST 2
Macons MST 2 vs JOHN SLCM 2.2: Which Self-Loading Mixer to Buy?
Both machines load, mix and pour concrete on site without a separate loader, so the choice comes down to slope handling against on-site tracking and drum size. The Macons MST 2 has a stronger 49.5 HP engine, climbs steeper slopes with a gradeability of 35%, and offers greater ground clearance at 355 mm for rough ground. The JOHN SLCM 2.2 carries a slightly bigger 2.2 m³ drum, runs on four-wheel drive, and adds GPS tracking for fleet owners who want to follow the machine's location and use.
For a contractor working on sloped or uneven sites who wants a compact, ground-hugging machine, the Macons MST 2 handles the terrain better. For a rental operator or fleet owner who wants to track machine location and slightly more mixing volume per batch, the JOHN SLCM 2.2's GPS and bigger drum add real value. See the full self-loading mixer range or our guide to concrete mixer types.
JOHN SLCM 2.2
Pros:
4-wheel drive mobility for rugged terrains
Advanced drum design for efficient mixing
GPS tracking for fleet management
Hydraulic operation for ease of use
Capable of on-site mixing which reduces travel time and costs
Slightly larger drum capacity of 2.2 m³
Cons:
Unknown transmission type
Higher price range compared to MACONS MST 2
Lower gradeability than MACONS MST 2
Smaller fuel tank capacity of 65 L
MACONS MST 2
Pros:
Compact design suitable for constrained spaces
Higher engine power of 49.5 HP
Hydrostatic 4 Speed transmission
Electrical parking brake for safety
Higher gradeability of 35%
Larger bucket capacity of 600 L and water tank of 600 L
Greater ground clearance of 355 mm
Cons:
Slightly smaller drum capacity of 2 m³
Lower maximum speed than JOHN SLCM 2.2
Heavier by 275 Kg which may affect fuel efficiency
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both machines load, mix and pour concrete on site without needing a separate loader, so the right pick depends on your ground conditions and whether you need fleet tracking. The Macons MST 2 has a stronger engine, climbs steeper slopes, and sits higher off the ground, which suits rough or sloped rural sites. The JOHN SLCM 2.2 carries a slightly bigger drum, runs on four-wheel drive, and adds GPS tracking, which suits a fleet owner or rental operator who wants to track the machine and mix slightly bigger batches. So match the machine to your work: Macons MST 2 for rough or sloped ground, JOHN SLCM 2.2 for fleet tracking and bigger batches.
JOHN SLCM 2.2 Vs MACONS MST 2 Self Loading Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Engineered compactly, the MACONS MST 2 Self-Loading Concrete Mixer delivers agile site mobility, efficient batching, and reliable mixing performance for constrained environments.
Macons MST 2 vs JOHN SLCM 2.2: Which Self-Loading Mixer to Buy?
Both machines load, mix and pour concrete on site without a separate loader, so the choice comes down to slope handling against on-site tracking and drum size. The Macons MST 2 has a stronger 49.5 HP engine, climbs steeper slopes with a gradeability of 35%, and offers greater ground clearance at 355 mm for rough ground. The JOHN SLCM 2.2 carries a slightly bigger 2.2 m³ drum, runs on four-wheel drive, and adds GPS tracking for fleet owners who want to follow the machine's location and use.
For a contractor working on sloped or uneven sites who wants a compact, ground-hugging machine, the Macons MST 2 handles the terrain better. For a rental operator or fleet owner who wants to track machine location and slightly more mixing volume per batch, the JOHN SLCM 2.2's GPS and bigger drum add real value. See the full self-loading mixer range or our guide to concrete mixer types.
JOHN SLCM 2.2
Pros:
4-wheel drive mobility for rugged terrains
Advanced drum design for efficient mixing
GPS tracking for fleet management
Hydraulic operation for ease of use
Capable of on-site mixing which reduces travel time and costs
Slightly larger drum capacity of 2.2 m³
Cons:
Unknown transmission type
Higher price range compared to MACONS MST 2
Lower gradeability than MACONS MST 2
Smaller fuel tank capacity of 65 L
MACONS MST 2
Pros:
Compact design suitable for constrained spaces
Higher engine power of 49.5 HP
Hydrostatic 4 Speed transmission
Electrical parking brake for safety
Higher gradeability of 35%
Larger bucket capacity of 600 L and water tank of 600 L
Greater ground clearance of 355 mm
Cons:
Slightly smaller drum capacity of 2 m³
Lower maximum speed than JOHN SLCM 2.2
Heavier by 275 Kg which may affect fuel efficiency
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both machines load, mix and pour concrete on site without needing a separate loader, so the right pick depends on your ground conditions and whether you need fleet tracking. The Macons MST 2 has a stronger engine, climbs steeper slopes, and sits higher off the ground, which suits rough or sloped rural sites. The JOHN SLCM 2.2 carries a slightly bigger drum, runs on four-wheel drive, and adds GPS tracking, which suits a fleet owner or rental operator who wants to track the machine and mix slightly bigger batches. So match the machine to your work: Macons MST 2 for rough or sloped ground, JOHN SLCM 2.2 for fleet tracking and bigger batches.
JOHN SLCM 2.2 Vs MACONS MST 2 Self Loading Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Questions buyers ask about the JOHN SLCM 2.2 vs MACONS MST 2
Ans.
The current JOHN model in this size class is the SLCM 2.2, with a 2.2 m³ drum, sold by Wisent Infratech. If you have seen "SLCM 2.0" written elsewhere, confirm the exact model and drum size with your dealer, since names and versions can change over time.
Ans.
The Macons MST 2 climbs steeper slopes, with a gradeability of 35% against the JOHN SLCM 2.2's lower rated gradeability. On sloped or uneven sites, that means fewer stalls when loading or moving.
Ans.
The JOHN SLCM 2.2 has GPS tracking built in, which helps a fleet owner or rental operator follow the machine's location and hours of use. The Macons MST 2 does not list GPS as a standard feature.
Ans.
The JOHN SLCM 2.2 carries a slightly bigger drum, at 2.2 m³ against the Macons MST 2's 2.0 m³. The small difference in drum size means slightly more concrete per batch on the JOHN model.
Ans.
The Macons MST 2 has more ground clearance, at 355 mm. This helps it move over rough, uneven or rocky ground without scraping, which matters on rural or half-built sites.
JOHN SLCM 2.2 Vs MACONS MST 2 - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare JOHN SLCM 2.2 Vs MACONS MST 2 price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
