JOHN SLCM 2.2
VS
MACONS MST 4.5
Self Loading Concrete Mixer
JOHN SLCM 2.2 vs MACONS MST 4.5: the two differ on 36 of 42 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (KOEL 49 HP vs KOEL 110 HP), Bucket Capacity (350 L vs 800 L), Fuel Tank (65 L vs 130 L), Drum Capacity (2.2 m³ vs 4.5 m³). The other 6 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
JOHN SLCM 2.2
MACONS MST 4.5
JOHN SLCM 2.2
VS
MACONS MST 4.5
Self Loading Concrete Mixer
JOHN SLCM 2.2 vs MACONS MST 4.5: the two differ on 36 of 42 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (KOEL 49 HP vs KOEL 110 HP), Bucket Capacity (350 L vs 800 L), Fuel Tank (65 L vs 130 L), Drum Capacity (2.2 m³ vs 4.5 m³). The other 6 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
JOHN SLCM 2.2
₹ 32 – 34 Lakhs
MACONS MST 4.5
₹ 40 – 42 Lakhs
Particulars
JOHN SLCM 2.2
MACONS MST 4.5
MACONS MST 4.5 vs JOHN SLCM 2.2: Which One to Buy?
These two self-loading concrete mixers come from different brands and suit different job sizes. The MACONS MST 4.5 has a bigger drum and a stronger, turbocharged engine, built for bigger pours and demanding sites. The JOHN SLCM 2.2 is the more compact machine, with GPS tracking built in as standard, and suits small to medium jobs where space and easy tracking matter more than raw output.
Since the two machines come from different companies, check each brand's dealer and parts reach near your site before you decide, because service support is not shared between them. If you run many small jobs and want to track your machine from your phone without paying extra, the JOHN SLCM 2.2 already gives you that. If your work is bigger pours on open sites, the MACONS MST 4.5 mixes more concrete in each batch. See the full self-loading mixer range or read our concrete mixer guide.
JOHN SLCM 2.2
Pros:
4-wheel drive mobility enhances off-road handling
GPS tracking for fleet management
Fully hydraulic steering with 3-Way Steering Position System for better maneuverability
Compact drum capacity suitable for small to medium-sized projects
Higher engine rotation speed at max rpm contributing to efficient mixing
Cons:
Lower engine power at 49 HP, which might limit performance in demanding conditions
No information on overall dimensions for site compatibility assessment
Smaller fuel tank may require more frequent refueling
Less gradeability than MACONS MST 4.5, affecting uphill performance
MACONS MST 4.5
Pros:
Higher engine power at 110 HP suitable for intensive tasks
Larger drum capacity for medium-scale jobs
Features a turbocharged and intercooled engine, ensuring efficient operation
Greater gradeability, enhancing performance on inclined surfaces
Larger bucket and water tank capacity for increased productivity
Cons:
Higher price range, which could be a significant factor in budget-restricted projects
Electrical parking brake might require more maintenance compared to mechanical systems
Heavier unladen weight could affect transportability and fuel efficiency
Bigger dimensions might not be compatible with restricted or narrow job sites
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
These two mixers come from different brands, so check dealer and parts support near your site before you choose. Pick the JOHN SLCM 2.2 when your jobs are small to medium and you want GPS tracking built in from day one. Pick the MACONS MST 4.5 when your pours are bigger and your site can take a larger, more powerful machine. So match the machine to your work: JOHN SLCM 2.2 for small and medium jobs with built-in tracking, MACONS MST 4.5 for bigger pours and heavier daily work.
JOHN SLCM 2.2 Vs MACONS MST 4.5 Self Loading Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The MACONS MST 4.5 Self-Loading Concrete Mixer offers smooth hydraulic discharge, robust construction, and high-grade productivity on medium-scale jobs.
MACONS MST 4.5 vs JOHN SLCM 2.2: Which One to Buy?
These two self-loading concrete mixers come from different brands and suit different job sizes. The MACONS MST 4.5 has a bigger drum and a stronger, turbocharged engine, built for bigger pours and demanding sites. The JOHN SLCM 2.2 is the more compact machine, with GPS tracking built in as standard, and suits small to medium jobs where space and easy tracking matter more than raw output.
Since the two machines come from different companies, check each brand's dealer and parts reach near your site before you decide, because service support is not shared between them. If you run many small jobs and want to track your machine from your phone without paying extra, the JOHN SLCM 2.2 already gives you that. If your work is bigger pours on open sites, the MACONS MST 4.5 mixes more concrete in each batch. See the full self-loading mixer range or read our concrete mixer guide.
JOHN SLCM 2.2
Pros:
4-wheel drive mobility enhances off-road handling
GPS tracking for fleet management
Fully hydraulic steering with 3-Way Steering Position System for better maneuverability
Compact drum capacity suitable for small to medium-sized projects
Higher engine rotation speed at max rpm contributing to efficient mixing
Cons:
Lower engine power at 49 HP, which might limit performance in demanding conditions
No information on overall dimensions for site compatibility assessment
Smaller fuel tank may require more frequent refueling
Less gradeability than MACONS MST 4.5, affecting uphill performance
MACONS MST 4.5
Pros:
Higher engine power at 110 HP suitable for intensive tasks
Larger drum capacity for medium-scale jobs
Features a turbocharged and intercooled engine, ensuring efficient operation
Greater gradeability, enhancing performance on inclined surfaces
Larger bucket and water tank capacity for increased productivity
Cons:
Higher price range, which could be a significant factor in budget-restricted projects
Electrical parking brake might require more maintenance compared to mechanical systems
Heavier unladen weight could affect transportability and fuel efficiency
Bigger dimensions might not be compatible with restricted or narrow job sites
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
These two mixers come from different brands, so check dealer and parts support near your site before you choose. Pick the JOHN SLCM 2.2 when your jobs are small to medium and you want GPS tracking built in from day one. Pick the MACONS MST 4.5 when your pours are bigger and your site can take a larger, more powerful machine. So match the machine to your work: JOHN SLCM 2.2 for small and medium jobs with built-in tracking, MACONS MST 4.5 for bigger pours and heavier daily work.
JOHN SLCM 2.2 Vs MACONS MST 4.5 Self Loading Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Questions buyers ask about the JOHN SLCM 2.2 vs MACONS MST 4.5
Ans.
The JOHN SLCM 2.2 suits small or medium jobs better. Its drum is more compact, so it fits tighter sites and works well when you do not need huge batches. It also costs less to run for these smaller volumes.
Ans.
The MACONS MST 4.5 suits bigger pours and demanding sites better. Its larger drum and stronger, turbocharged engine handle bigger volumes without strain, so it fits commercial jobs and larger roads well.
Ans.
Yes, GPS tracking is fitted as standard on the JOHN SLCM 2.2. This lets you check the machine's location and use from your phone without paying extra for it. On the MACONS MST 4.5, ask your dealer if tracking can be added.
Ans.
Yes, parts support is different because the two brands run separate dealer networks. Before you buy, check which brand has a service point close to your site, since that decides how fast you get spares when something breaks.
Ans.
Yes. Banks, NBFCs and dealer finance schemes fund both machines. Your monthly amount depends on your down payment and your credit record. Ask a few lenders and compare terms before you choose.
Ans.
The MACONS MST 4.5 is often easier to sell later because MACONS is a longer-established name among concrete contractors. The JOHN SLCM 2.2 is newer in the market, but its GPS feature appeals to buyers who want easy tracking from day one.
JOHN SLCM 2.2 Vs MACONS MST 4.5 - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare JOHN SLCM 2.2 Vs MACONS MST 4.5 price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
