ACE ASD 115 VS Dynapac CA305 CEV-V Compactor

₹ 32-34 Lakhs^*

ACE ASD 115

Weight

11000 kg
Drum Width

2130 mm
Engine

M&M 112 HP
Static Load

30.52 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

254/176 kN
Travel Speed

0–29 km/hr

Soil Compactor

₹ 34-36 Lakhs^*

Dynapac CA305 CEV-V

Weight

10800 kg
Drum Width

2130 mm
Engine

KOEL 110 HP
Static Load

29.0 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

250/130 kN
Travel Speed

0-11 Km/hr

Soil Compactor

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

ACE ASD 115 VS Dynapac CA305 CEV-V Compactor

ACE ASD 115

₹ 32-34 Lakhs

Dynapac CA305 CEV-V

₹ 34-36 Lakhs

Particulars	ACE ASD 115	Dynapac CA305 CEV-V

ACE ASD 115 vs Dynapac CA305 CEV-V: Which One Should You Buy?

The ACE ASD 115 climbs steeper slopes, has a stronger static linear load for compaction force, runs at higher working speed, and carries more fuel for longer working days. The Dynapac CA305 CEV-V comes with a longer warranty for extra cover and offers dual amplitude settings, so the driver can adjust the vibration to suit different soil types on the same job.

If your sites have steep slopes or embankments and you want a longer working day between refuels, the ACE ASD 115's power and fuel range work in your favour. If you value extra warranty cover and the flexibility to switch vibration settings for mixed soil conditions, the Dynapac CA305 CEV-V is worth a look. See the full ACE compactor range, the Dynapac compactor range, all compactors, or read our compactor buying guide.

Dynapac CA305 CEV-V Soil Compactor Roller

Pros:

110 HP KOEL CEV-V compliant engine ensures good performance
Operating mass of 10,800 kg provides powerful compaction
Hydrostatic drive facilitates efficient operation
Static linear load of 29.0 kg/cm ensures uniform compaction
Travel speed of up to 11 km/hr enhances productivity
Dual amplitude settings offer versatility
Large fuel tank capacity of 280 L for extended operation periods
18 months warranty indicates good manufacturer support

Cons:

Lower max gradeability of 34% compared to ACE ASD 115
Hydraulic tank capacity not specified which could be relevant for maintenance planning

ACE ASD 115 Soil Compactor Roller

Pros:

Higher engine power of 112 HP for potentially better compaction
Greater static linear load of 30.52 kg/cm offers stronger compaction force
Higher max gradeability of 45% indicates better performance on slopes
Greater working and travel speed of 0–29 km/hr increases efficiency
Larger fuel tank of 315 L supports longer operating times without refueling
Better oscillation at ±10° could lead to more effective compaction on uneven surfaces
Detailed reporting of all fluid capacities is beneficial for maintenance
Hydrostatic steering and brakes contribute to easier handling and safety

Cons:

Shorter warranty period of 1 year compared to Dynapac
Slightly higher operating weight at 11,000 kg which may affect transportability

Closing Recommendation

Both the ACE ASD 115 and the Dynapac CA305 CEV-V handle regular soil compaction work on roads and embankments. Choose the ACE ASD 115 when your site has steep slopes, and you want more compaction force, higher speed and a bigger fuel tank. Choose the Dynapac CA305 CEV-V when a longer warranty and the flexibility to adjust vibration settings for mixed soil matter more to you. So match the machine to your work: ACE ASD 115 for slopes, speed and power, Dynapac CA305 CEV-V for warranty and soil flexibility.