ACE ASD 115 VS HAMM HC 119i Compactor

₹ 32-34 Lakhs^*

ACE ASD 115

Weight

11000 kg
Drum Width

2130 mm
Engine

M&M 112 HP
Static Load

30.52 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

254/176 kN
Travel Speed

0–29 km/hr

Soil Compactor

₹ 35-37 Lakhs^*

HAMM HC 119i

Weight

11200 kg
Drum Width

2140 mm
Engine

Ashok Leyland 99.2 HP
Static Load

28.3 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

242/145 kN
Travel Speed

0–12.0 km/hr

Soil Compactor

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

ACE ASD 115 VS HAMM HC 119i Compactor

ACE ASD 115

₹ 32-34 Lakhs

HAMM HC 119i

₹ 35-37 Lakhs

Particulars	ACE ASD 115	HAMM HC 119i

ACE ASD 115 vs HAMM HC 119i: Which Soil Compactor Should You Pick?

Both are soil compactors built for road and infrastructure work. The ACE ASD 115 has a stronger engine, higher compaction force and a much higher gradeability, so it can climb steeper embankments and work faster across large areas. The HAMM HC 119i runs a fuel-efficient, reliable engine, with a compaction system built for versatile jobs, and it gives the driver good visibility and easy, intuitive controls.

If your site has steep slopes or you need to cover ground fast, the ACE ASD 115's higher gradeability and speed help you finish sooner. If steady, efficient compaction with easy operation and lower running cost matter more, the HAMM HC 119i is worth a closer look. Also check the turning space on your site, since the ACE ASD 115 needs more room to turn. Explore the ACE compactor range, the HAMM compactor range, all compactors, or read our compactor guide.

HAMM HC 119i Soil Compactor

Pros:

Equipped with a 99 HP Ashok Leyland CEV V engine that ensures fuel efficiency and reliability
Features dual vibration amplitudes (242 kN and 145 kN) for versatile compaction
Operating weight of 11,200 kg with a static linear load of 28.3 kg/cm aids in powerful and consistent compaction
Great visibility for the operator, with intuitive controls and 3-point articulation for ease of use

Cons:

Lower maximum gradeability of 30% compared to the ACE ASD 115
Travel speeds are limited to 12.0 km/hr which may affect the rate of operation

ACE ASD 115 Soil Compactor

Pros:

Higher engine power at 112 HP, with a strong water-cooled turbocharged diesel engine
Superior static linear load of 30.52 kg/cm for effective compaction force
Features high vibration frequency (40/33 Hz) and centrifugal force (254/176 kN) for efficient soil compaction
Higher gradeability of 45% makes it suitable for steeper terrains
Faster travel and working speed of up to 29 km/hr increases operational efficiency

Cons:

Turning radius is larger on the outside (6050 mm), which could affect maneuverability in tight spaces
Lower fuel efficiency may be implied with the higher power engine and rapid travel speeds

Closing Recommendation

Both are effective soil compactors for road and infrastructure work. Choose the ACE ASD 115 when you need higher gradeability, faster travel speed and stronger compaction force for steep or large sites. Choose the HAMM HC 119i when you want a fuel-efficient engine, easy visibility and controls, and flexible vibration settings for different job types. So match the machine to your work: ACE ASD 115 for steep, large-area jobs, HAMM HC 119i for fuel efficiency and easy day-to-day operation.