ACE ASD 115 VS HAMM HC 139iD Compactor

₹ 32-34 Lakhs^*

ACE ASD 115

Weight

11000 kg
Drum Width

2130 mm
Engine

M&M 112 HP
Static Load

30.52 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

254/176 kN
Travel Speed

0–29 km/hr

Soil Compactor

₹ 37-39 Lakhs^*

HAMM HC 139iD

Weight

13160 kg
Drum Width

2140 mm
Engine

Ashok Leyland 128 HP
Static Load

34.9 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

241/145 kN
Travel Speed

0–12.0 km/hr

Soil Compactor

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

ACE ASD 115 VS HAMM HC 139iD Compactor

ACE ASD 115

₹ 32-34 Lakhs

HAMM HC 139iD

₹ 37-39 Lakhs

Particulars	ACE ASD 115	HAMM HC 139iD

ACE ASD 115 vs HAMM HC 139iD: Which Soil Compactor Wins for Your Site?

Both these rollers compact soil for road and infrastructure work, but they trade off differently. The ACE ASD 115 carries more fuel, drives faster between passes, and covers a wide range of soil and tandem compaction jobs. The HAMM HC 139iD compacts with more force, climbs steeper slopes, and adds an ECO mode to save fuel.

On long stretches of road work where fewer stops matter, the ACE ASD 115's bigger tank and higher speed help finish more ground per day. On sites with tougher soil or steep grades, the HAMM HC 139iD's extra compaction force and gradeability get the job done in fewer passes. See the full ACE compactor range, the HAMM compactor range, all soil compactors, and the compactor buying guide.

ACE ASD 115 Soil Compactor Roller

Pros:

Combines smart technology, high productivity, and low maintenance
Supports varied applications with a range of 10 to 12 ton soil compactors and 3.5 to 9 tons tandem compactors
Impressive static linear load of 30.52 kg/cm for effective soil compaction
Equipped with a Hydrostatic drive transmission ensuring smooth operation
Notable maximum gradeability of 45% which is beneficial for steep surfaces
High-capacity fuel tank of 315 L for extended operations without frequent refueling

Cons:

Lower engine power compared to HAMM HC 139iD with 112 HP
Smaller drum width than HAMM HC 139iD with 2130 mm vs 2140 mm
Vibration frequency on the lower side with 40/33 Hz compared to HAMM's 30/35 Hz

Hamm HC 139iD Soil Compactor Roller

Pros:

Higher engine power of 128 HP provides robust performance
Greater static linear load of 34.9 kg/cm, enhancing soil compaction effectiveness
Features a two-stage front drum vibration system for superior compaction
Better gradeability of 48% to tackle challenging slopes
Articulated Steering provides good maneuverability
Equipped with ECO mode for better fuel efficiency

Cons:

Relatively small fuel tank with 270 L compared to ACE ASD 115's 315 L
Offers a maximum travel speed of 12 km/hr, less than ACE ASD 115's 29 km/hr
Curb Clearance of 500 mm may limit maneuverability in certain situations

Closing Recommendation

Think about your soil type and your ground slope. The ACE ASD 115 carries more fuel, drives faster, and handles a wide mix of soil and tandem jobs. The HAMM HC 139iD compacts with more force, climbs steeper slopes, and saves fuel in ECO mode. So match the machine to your work: ACE ASD 115 for long stretches and mixed jobs, HAMM HC 139iD for tough soil and steep slopes.