L&T 1190 VS HAMM HC 119iD Compactor

₹ 30-32 Lakhs^*

L&T 1190

Weight

11050 kg
Drum Width

2100 mm
Engine

M&M 102 HP
Static Load

30.5 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

258/169 kN
Travel Speed

12.0 km/hr

Soil Compactor

₹ 35-37 Lakhs^*

HAMM HC 119iD

Weight

11800 kg
Drum Width

2140 mm
Engine

Ashok Leyland 99.2 HP
Static Load

29.1 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

241/145 kN
Travel Speed

0–12.0 km/hr

Soil Compactor

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before macking any final decision.

L&T 1190 VS HAMM HC 119iD Compactor

L&T 1190

₹ 30-32 Lakhs

HAMM HC 119iD

₹ 35-37 Lakhs

Particulars	L&T 1190	HAMM HC 119iD

Overview Summary

The HAMM HC 119iD and L&T 1190 are both skilled contenders in the realm of soil compactors. While the HAMM HC 119iD boasts excellent engine efficiency with a hydrostatic drive and higher gradeability, the L&T 1190 counters with a higher static linear load and standard telematics for overall operational advantage.

HAMM HC 119iD Soil Compactor

Pros:

Maximum operating weight of 13,360 kg allows for robust compaction
Powerful 99 HP Ashok Leyland CEV V engine offers efficiency with ECO mode
Hydrostatic drive improves maneuverability
Higher gradeability of up to 53% allows for use on steeper slopes
More extensive vibration frequency range for varying soil compaction requirements
Articulated steering with a higher steering angle of ±33° provides better control
Optional telematics for real-time monitoring and management

Cons:

Lower maximum engine power compared to L&T 1190
Slightly lower static linear load of 29.1 kg/cm may affect compaction uniformity
No information on the battery specification
Hydraulic and engine crankcase capacities not provided

L&T 1190 Soil Compactor

Pros:

102 HP Mahindra engine provides ample power for demanding tasks
Higher static linear load of 30.5 kg/cm for better soil compaction
Telematics comes as standard for enhanced fleet management
Large drum-shell thickness of 30 mm indicates potential for durability
Hydrostatic steering with a greater steering angle of ±37°
More clearance in ground and curb parameters could lead to fewer operational hindrances
Detailed specs available for fuel, hydraulic, engine crank case, and coolant capacities

Cons:

Slightly lower operating weight of 11,050 kg might reduce compaction effectiveness
Gradeability of 40% is less compared to HAMM HC 119iD
Fewer vibrations per minute at both high and low amplitudes
Lesser operating speed at 7.5 km/hr could impact efficiency
Smaller turning radius inside compared to HAMM HC 119iD could be limiting in tighter spaces

Closing Recommendation

If your projects require a compactor with superior gradeability and diverse vibration frequencies for different soil types, consider the HAMM HC 119iD. On the other hand, if higher compaction effectiveness and a robust engine are your key requirements, along with the benefits of included fleet management systems, the L&T 1190 might be the preferred choice.