L&T 1190 VS XCMG XS115H Compactor

₹ 30-32 Lakhs^*

L&T 1190

Weight

11050 kg
Drum Width

2100 mm
Engine

M&M 102 HP
Static Load

30.5 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

258/169 kN
Travel Speed

12.0 km/hr

Soil Compactor

₹ 37-39 Lakhs^*

XCMG XS115H

Weight

11500 kg
Drum Width

2130 mm
Engine

Weichai 133 HP
Static Load

29.7 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

285/160 kN
Travel Speed

11.5 km/hr

Soil Compactor

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

L&T 1190 VS XCMG XS115H Compactor

L&T 1190

₹ 30-32 Lakhs

XCMG XS115H

₹ 37-39 Lakhs

Particulars	L&T 1190	XCMG XS115H

L&T 1190 vs XCMG XS115H: Which Soil Compactor to Buy?

Both are single-drum soil compactors built for road and infrastructure work, so the difference is in how they handle soil type and slope. The L&T 1190 runs a hydrostatic transmission with manual displacement, comes with telematics as standard, and climbs steeper slopes. The XCMG XS115H runs a full-hydraulic double-drive system, carries a bigger fuel and AdBlue tank for longer runs between stops, and its high-frequency vibration suits granular and sandy soils.

For a contractor working on hilly sites or one who wants fleet tracking built in, the L&T 1190 is the simpler pick. For a contractor compacting sandy or granular soil over long shifts without refuelling often, the XCMG XS115H's tank size and vibration settings help more. See the full compactor range, the L&T compactor lineup, or our compactor buying guide.

L&T 1190 Soil Compactor Roller

Pros:

Operating weight of 11,050 kg provides stability and efficient compaction
Dual vibration frequencies (31/34 Hz) offer adaptability to different soil types
Powered by efficiency-focused 102 HP Mahindra MTorque CEV-V engine
Incorporates safety features like a rugged ROPS canopy and isolated operator platform
Hydrostatic transmission with manual displacement ensures smooth operation
Higher gradeability of 40% suitable for working on slopes
Includes telematics as a standard feature for enhanced equipment management

Cons:

Lower engine power compared to the XCMG XS115H (102 HP vs 133 HP)
Travel speed is slightly higher with the XCMG XS115H (12.0 km/hr vs 11.5 km/hr)
Turning radius, inside not as tight as the XCMG model (3350 mm vs XCMG's 5980 mm outside, inside NA)

XCMG XS115H Soil Compactor Roller

Pros:

Slightly heavier operating weight of 11,500 kg for robust compaction
Equipped with a more powerful 133 HP Weichai engine for challenging tasks
Offers higher centrifugal force settings for versatile compaction (285/160 kN)
High-frequency vibration suited for granular and semi-cohesive soils (30/35 Hz)
Features a full-hydraulic, double-drive propulsion system for optimal drive control
Larger fuel and Adblue tanks (255 L and 30 L) for extended operation periods
Articulated steering provides maneuverability on-site

Cons:

Lower maximum gradient capacity compared to L&T 1190 (31% vs 40%)
Doesn't include telematics as a standard feature
Smaller ground clearance than L&T 1190 (393.5 mm vs 375 mm)

Closing Recommendation

Both compactors handle road and infrastructure compaction well, so the right pick depends on your ground and how you like to run the machine. The XCMG XS115H brings more engine power and a full-hydraulic drive system, which suits jobs that need extra push and manoeuvring. The L&T 1190 climbs steeper slopes and comes with telematics built in, which suits hilly sites and fleet owners who want to track the machine. So match the machine to your work: XCMG XS115H for extra power and manoeuvring, L&T 1190 for steep slopes and fleet tracking.