Ammann ARS 110.2 VS Escorts EC 5250 Compactor

Price Available Soon^*

Ammann ARS 110.2

Weight

11100 kg
Drum Width

2130 mm
Engine

Ashok Leyland 101 HP
Static Load

28.6 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

275/160 kN
Travel Speed

11.5 km/hr

Soil Compactor

₹ 30-32 Lakhs^*

Escorts EC 5250

Weight

10350 kg
Drum Width

2130 mm
Engine

KOEL 110 HP
Static Load

23.7 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

211/89 kN
Travel Speed

0–23 km/hr

Soil Compactor

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

Ammann ARS 110.2 VS Escorts EC 5250 Compactor

Ammann ARS 110.2

Price Available Soon

Escorts EC 5250

₹ 30-32 Lakhs

Particulars	Ammann ARS 110.2	Escorts EC 5250

Ammann ARS 110.2 vs Escorts EC 5250: Which Soil Compactor to Buy?

Both are soil compactors built for road and infrastructure work, but they push in different directions. The Ammann ARS 110.2 gives higher centrifugal force and runs a CEV Stage V engine, so it suits deep, dense compaction with cleaner emissions. The Escorts EC 5250 has more engine power, better gradeability, and a faster travel speed, so it moves and climbs slopes with less strain.

If your project needs strong compaction on thick fill and you want an emission-compliant engine for government tenders, the Ammann ARS 110.2 fits well. If your site has slopes or you need to cover ground quickly, the Escorts EC 5250's speed and gradeability help you finish sooner. See the full Ammann range, the Escorts range, all compactors, or read our compactor guide.

Ammann ARS 110.2 Soil Compactor

Pros:

Weighs 11100 kg which is heavier than the Escorts EC 5250, potentially offering better compaction force
Centrifugal force of 275 kN high and 160 kN low which is higher than the one provided by Escorts EC 5250
Ashok Leyland engine adheres to CEV Stage V emissions standards, ensuring better environmental compliance
Dual amplitude and frequency settings increase the machine's versatility across different types of terrain
ECOdrop system might imply better fuel efficiency and sustainability
Has a higher operating speed of 6 km/hr for increased productivity

Cons:

Has a lower maximum gradeability at 35% compared to EC 5250's 40%
Travel speed is lower at 11.5 km/hr compared to the EC 5250's 23 km/hr

Escorts EC 5250 Soil Compactor

Pros:

Higher engine power with 110 HP (82 kW) compared to Ammann ARS 110.2's 101 HP
Better maximum gradeability at 40%, making it suitable for steeper terrains compared to the ARS 110.2
A faster travel speed of up to 23 km/hr which could lead to faster job completion in certain conditions
Lower operating weight at 10350 kg, which might result in easier transportation and maneuvering
Has a higher vibration frequency on the low setting at 42 Hz, which may be beneficial for certain compaction tasks

Cons:

Centrifugal force is less (211 kN high and 89 kN low) than Ammann ARS 110.2
Static linear load is lower at 23.7 kg/cm which might affect the compaction quality compared to ARS 110.2's 28.6 kg/cm
The hydraulic tank capacity is higher at 80 L compared to ARS 110.2's 52 L, which could indicate higher fluid maintenance costs

Closing Recommendation

Both machines compact soil for road and site work, but they suit different ground and priorities. Choose the Ammann ARS 110.2 when you need strong compaction force on thick or dense fill and want an engine that meets clean emission rules. Choose the Escorts EC 5250 when your site has slopes or you need to cover ground faster with more engine power. So match the machine to your work: Ammann ARS 110.2 for dense compaction and emission compliance, Escorts EC 5250 for slopes and speed.