Ammann ARS 110.2 VS HAMM HC 139iD Compactor

Price Available Soon^*

Ammann ARS 110.2

Weight

11100 kg
Drum Width

2130 mm
Engine

Ashok Leyland 101 HP
Static Load

28.6 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

275/160 kN
Travel Speed

11.5 km/hr

Soil Compactor

₹ 37-39 Lakhs^*

HAMM HC 139iD

Weight

13160 kg
Drum Width

2140 mm
Engine

Ashok Leyland 128 HP
Static Load

34.9 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

241/145 kN
Travel Speed

0–12.0 km/hr

Soil Compactor

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

Ammann ARS 110.2 VS HAMM HC 139iD Compactor

Ammann ARS 110.2

Price Available Soon

HAMM HC 139iD

₹ 37-39 Lakhs

Particulars	Ammann ARS 110.2	HAMM HC 139iD

Ammann ARS 110.2 vs Hamm HC 139iD: Which Soil Compactor to Buy?

The Ammann ARS 110.2 gives you dual amplitude settings and a fuel-saving ECOdrop system, so it suits contractors who work on different ground types and want to keep fuel cost down. The Hamm HC 139iD has a stronger engine and a heavier build, so it suits bigger compaction jobs and sites with steep inclines.

Both machines are built as single drum rollers for large-scale compaction work. Check that a dealer for your chosen brand is close to your site, since parts and service reach can vary by area. A fleet owner running mixed terrain jobs may lean toward the Ammann, while a contractor doing steady, heavy compaction on one big site may prefer the Hamm. See the full Ammann compactor range, the Hamm compactor range, or read the compactor buying guide.

Ammann ARS 110.2 Soil Compactor Roller

Pros:

Higher centrifugal force in high amplitude mode (275 kN) for better compaction
Dual amplitude and frequency settings enhance versatility on different surfaces
Engine meets CEV Stage V emissions standards, which implies reduced pollution
Higher maximum travel speed (11.5 km/hr) compared to HAMM HC 139iD for potentially faster project completion
Features an ECOdrop system for improved fuel efficiency

Cons:

Lower engine power compared to HAMM HC 139iD (101 HP vs 128 HP)
Less weight and static linear load than HAMM HC 139iD, which could impact compaction effectiveness in certain scenarios
Lower max. gradeability (35%) which may limit performance on steep inclines

Hamm HC 139iD Soil Compactor Roller

Pros:

Higher engine power (128 HP) provides better operational capacity
Larger static linear load (34.9 kg/cm) could lead to more efficient compaction
Increased max. gradeability (48%) allows better performance on steep terrains
Higher operating weight (13,160 kg) suggests a more robust build quality

Cons:

Lower centrifugal force in high amplitude mode (241 kN) compared to Ammann ARS 110.2
Lack of an ECOdrop system could mean lower fuel efficiency
Slightly slower maximum travel speed (12.0 km/hr) than the Ammann ARS 110.2

Closing Recommendation

The right pick between these two rollers depends on your ground type and how steep your site gets. Choose the Ammann ARS 110.2 if your work covers different surfaces and you want to save on fuel with dual amplitude settings and ECOdrop. Choose the Hamm HC 139iD if you need more engine power, a heavier build and better climbing on steep inclines. So match the machine to your work: ARS 110.2 for varied surfaces and fuel saving, HC 139iD for heavy compaction and steep terrain.