Ammann ARS 110.2 VS XCMG XS115H Compactor

Price Available Soon^*

Ammann ARS 110.2

Weight

11100 kg
Drum Width

2130 mm
Engine

Ashok Leyland 101 HP
Static Load

28.6 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

275/160 kN
Travel Speed

11.5 km/hr

Soil Compactor

₹ 37-39 Lakhs^*

XCMG XS115H

Weight

11500 kg
Drum Width

2130 mm
Engine

Weichai 133 HP
Static Load

29.7 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

285/160 kN
Travel Speed

11.5 km/hr

Soil Compactor

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

Ammann ARS 110.2 VS XCMG XS115H Compactor

Ammann ARS 110.2

Price Available Soon

XCMG XS115H

₹ 37-39 Lakhs

Particulars	Ammann ARS 110.2	XCMG XS115H

Ammann ARS 110.2 vs XCMG XS115H: Which Soil Compactor to Buy?

Both these are single drum soil compactors for road and site compaction work. The XCMG XS115H runs a more powerful engine and a full-hydraulic double-drive system that helps it push through tougher, thicker soil layers. The Ammann ARS 110.2 is a little lighter, meets the newer CEV Stage V emission standard, and offers optional telematics so a fleet owner can track machine use and location.

If your work needs raw compacting power on hard or thick fill, the XCMG XS115H's stronger engine helps you get through faster. If you want a cleaner-running engine, easier machine tracking, and a slightly lighter machine to move between sites, the Ammann ARS 110.2 fits better. Ask your dealer to confirm current emission norms in your state, since some government road projects prefer machines with the newer engine standard. See the full Ammann compactor range, all soil compactors, or read our compactor buying guide.

XCMG XS115H Soil Compactor

Pros:

Higher engine power at 133 HP
Higher vibration frequency options with 30/35 Hz
Larger fuel tank capacity at 255 L
Better gradeability of 31%
Features a full-hydraulic double-drive propulsion system for better maneuverability

Cons:

Slightly heavier with an operating weight of 11500 kg
Drum shell thickness is greater at 30 mm, potentially meaning higher maintenance
No telematics as a standard feature

Ammann ARS 110.2 Soil Compactor

Pros:

More environmentally friendly engine with CEV Stage V compliance
Slightly lighter with an operating weight of 11100 kg
Offers a hydrostatic transmission
Larger steering angle of ±36° providing better maneuverability
Optional telematics for equipment management

Cons:

Lower engine power at 101 HP
Smaller fuel tank capacity at 310 L compared to XCMG
Lower gradeability of 35%

Closing Recommendation

Both these soil compactors do solid road and site compaction work, so pick based on what matters more to you. Choose the XCMG XS115H when you need strong engine power to push through tough, thick soil layers. Choose the Ammann ARS 110.2 when you want a cleaner-running engine, machine tracking, and a slightly lighter machine to move around. So match the machine to your work: XCMG XS115H for raw compacting power, Ammann ARS 110.2 for cleaner running and easy tracking.