Conmat MR 80C VS Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixer

Conmat MR 80C vs Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2): the two differ on 29 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Schwing Stetter Transit mixer), Drum Size (8.0 m³ vs 7.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 3900 kg), Capacity (14400 L vs 12750 L). The other 12 specs are the same.

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Price Available Soon^*

Conmat MR 80C

Drum Size

8.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3850 kg
Capacity

14400 L
Filling Ratio

56%
Water Tank

600 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Price Available Soon^*

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)

Drum Size

7.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3900 kg
Capacity

12750 L
Filling Ratio

55%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-12 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Add a third machine

What's different: Conmat MR 80C vs Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)

29 specs differ, 12 are identical. The full tables are below.

Spec	Conmat MR 80C	Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)
Brand	Conmat Transit mixer	Schwing Stetter Transit mixer
Drum Size	8.0 m³	7.0 m³
Mixer Weight	3850 kg	3900 kg
Capacity	14400 L	12750 L
Filling Ratio	56%	55%
Water Tank	600 L	450 L
RPM	0-14 rpm	0-12 rpm
Drum Drive	P.T.O.	P.T.O. /Slave Engine

See all 29 differences ↓

Conmat MR 80C price & full specs →Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) price & full specs →

* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

Conmat MR 80C VS Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixer

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Conmat MR 80C

Price Available Soon

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)

Price Available Soon

Particulars	Conmat MR 80C	Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)

Conmat MR 80C vs Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2): Bigger Loads or Easier Turns?

The Conmat MR 80C carries more per trip, at 8.0 cubic meters nominal filling capacity against 7.0 cubic meters on the Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2), backed by a bigger 14400 L geometric volume, a 100 HP engine, and a 600 L water tank. Its drum also spins faster, up to 14 rpm against 12 rpm on the Stetter.

That bigger capacity comes with a longer mixer, 6570 mm on the Conmat MR 80C, which can make tight turns harder. The Stetter AM 7 (C2) keeps its minimum length shorter at 6250 mm for easier maneuvering, states a water line volume of 8250 liters, and gives a specific concrete weight figure of 16800 kg. It also offers a choice between P.T.O. and Slave Engine drum drive. Compare more machines on the concrete mixer hub and read the concrete mixer types guide.

Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer

Pros:

Larger nominal filling capacity at 8.0 m³
Higher geometric volume at 14400 L
Greater engine power with 100 HP (74 kW)
Larger water tank capacity at 600 L
Faster rotation speed, allowing for 0-14 rpm

Cons:

Mixer length is longer at 6570 mm which might affect maneuverability
Empty mixer weight is slightly lower at 3850 kg, potentially indicating lighter construction

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixer

Pros:

Shorter minimum mixer length at 6250 mm for potential better maneuverability
Water line volume is defined at 8250 L
Detailed concrete weight measurement provided: 16800 kg
Options for drum drive include both P.T.O. and Slave Engine

Cons:

Smaller nominal filling capacity at 7.0 m³
Lower engine power with 70 HP (52 kW)
Smaller water tank capacity at 450 L
Lower maximum rotation speed at 0-12 rpm

Closing Recommendation

Weigh capacity against maneuvering room on your site. Greater capacity and water storage per trip point to the Conmat MR 80C. Operations that need a shorter mixer for easier turning point to the Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2). So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 80C for higher-volume hauling, Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) for sites that need easier maneuvering.