Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) VS Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer

Price Available Soon^*

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)

Drum Size

7.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3900 kg
Capacity

12750 L
Filling Ratio

55%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-12 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Price Available Soon^*

Conmat MR 60C

Drum Size

6.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3850 kg
Capacity

11100 L
Filling Ratio

54%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before macking any final decision.

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) VS Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)

Price Available Soon

Conmat MR 60C

Price Available Soon

Particulars	Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)	Conmat MR 60C

Overview Summary

Comparing the Conmat MR 60C and Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixers, both have a nominal engine power of 70 HP and are built for use on 3 Axle trucks. The MR 60C is tailored for regional project sites with a 6.0 m³ capacity, while the AM 7 (C2) can transport a larger capacity of concrete with 7 cu m, suggesting it's better for larger construction needs.

Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer

Pros:

Efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites
Reasonable concrete nominal filling capacity of 6.0 m³
Geometric volume of 11100 L suggests a good drum size
Rotation speed up to 14 rpm can result in better mixing
Powered by a Kirloskar HA 494 with 70 HP which offers reliable performance

Cons:

Smaller drum diameter compared to Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)
No water line volume specified to gauge maximum efficient water level
Certain mixer details like Shell Thickness, Overhang, and Water Pump specs are not available

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixer

Pros:

Offers a higher nominal capacity of 7 cu m for larger concrete transportation jobs
Larger geometric volume of 12750 L indicates a more spacious drum
Well-defined water line volume at 8250 L which is beneficial for optimal mixing preparation
Has a slightly bigger drum diameter of 2300 mm

Cons:

The rotation speed of 0-12 rpm is slightly less than Conmat MR 60C which may affect mixing performance
Weighs slightly more empty at 3900 kg which could have a minor impact on fuel efficiency
Engine make is not specified which could be important for some buyers

Closing Recommendation

If your priority is capacity and a higher concrete volume transport requirement, the Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) would be the recommended choice. For projects that do not require the additional 1m³ capacity, the Conmat MR 60C remains a strong candidate, especially if the details of engine make are crucial for maintenance and service considerations.

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features


Brand	Schwing Stetter Transit mixer	Conmat Transit mixer
Type	Standard Transit Mixer	Standard Transit Mixer
Ex-Showroom Price	Price Available Soon	Price Available Soon
Drum Size	7.0 m³	6.0 m³
Mixer Weight	3900 kg	3850 kg
Capacity	12750 L	11100 L
Filling Ratio	55%	54%
Water Tank	450 L	450 L
RPM	0-12 rpm	0-14 rpm
Quick Overview:	The Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixer delivers a nominal capacity of 7 cu m. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer meets diverse jobsite concrete needs with efficient throughput.	The Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m, making this concrete mixer efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites.

Overview Summary

Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer

Pros:

Efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites
Reasonable concrete nominal filling capacity of 6.0 m³
Geometric volume of 11100 L suggests a good drum size
Rotation speed up to 14 rpm can result in better mixing
Powered by a Kirloskar HA 494 with 70 HP which offers reliable performance

Cons:

Smaller drum diameter compared to Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)
No water line volume specified to gauge maximum efficient water level
Certain mixer details like Shell Thickness, Overhang, and Water Pump specs are not available

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixer

Pros:

Offers a higher nominal capacity of 7 cu m for larger concrete transportation jobs
Larger geometric volume of 12750 L indicates a more spacious drum
Well-defined water line volume at 8250 L which is beneficial for optimal mixing preparation
Has a slightly bigger drum diameter of 2300 mm

Cons:

The rotation speed of 0-12 rpm is slightly less than Conmat MR 60C which may affect mixing performance
Weighs slightly more empty at 3900 kg which could have a minor impact on fuel efficiency
Engine make is not specified which could be important for some buyers

Closing Recommendation

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)	Conmat MR 60C
Brand
Schwing Stetter Transit mixer	Conmat Transit mixer
Type
Standard Transit Mixer	Standard Transit Mixer
Ex-Showroom Price
Price Available Soon	Price Available Soon
Drum Size
7.0 m³	6.0 m³
Mixer Weight
3900 kg	3850 kg
Geometric Volume
12750 L	11100 L
Filling Ratio
55%	54%
Water Tank
450 L	450 L
RPM
0-12 rpm	0-14 rpm
Quick Overview:
The Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixer delivers a nominal capacity of 7 cu m. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer meets diverse jobsite concrete needs with efficient throughput.	The Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m, making this concrete mixer efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites.

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Key Highlights

	Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)	Conmat MR 60C
Drum Drive	P.T.O. /Slave Engine	P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume	8250 L	NA
Shell Thickness	NA	NA
Drum diameter	2300 mm	2267 mm
Rotation Speed	0-12 rpm	0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications	3 Axle	3 Axle
Mixer Length	6250 mm / 6400 mm	5590 mm
Mixer Width	2400 mm	2350 mm
Mixer Height	2650 mm	2630 mm
Engine Power	70 HP (52 kW)	70 HP (52 kW)

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Key Highlights

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)	Conmat MR 60C
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine	P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
8250 L	NA
Shell Thickness
NA	NA
Drum diameter
2300 mm	2267 mm
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm	0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle	3 Axle
Mixer Length
6250 mm / 6400 mm	5590 mm
Mixer Width
2400 mm	2350 mm
Mixer Height
2650 mm	2630 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)	70 HP (52 kW)

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Specifications

Mixer Dimension

	Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)	Conmat MR 60C
Length of Mixer Sub Frame	NA	NA
Mixer Length	6250 mm / 6400 mm	5590 mm
Mixer Height	2650 mm	2630 mm
Over Hang	NA	NA
Mixer Width	2400 mm	2350 mm
Truck Specifications	3 Axle	3 Axle
Shell Thickness	NA	NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)	3900 kg	3850 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)	16800 kg	NA

Performance

	Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)	Conmat MR 60C
Nomial Filling Capacity	7.0 m³	6.0 m³
Geometric Volume	12750 L	11100 L
Water Line Volume	8250 L	NA
Filling Ratio	55%	54%
Rotation Speed	0-12 rpm	0-14 rpm
Drum Diameter	2300 mm	2267 mm
Water Tank Capacity	450 L	450 L
Water Pump Pressure	NA	NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet	NA	NA
Water Meter Scale	NA	NA
Drum Drive	P.T.O. /Slave Engine	P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Engine Power	70 HP (52 kW)	70 HP (52 kW)
Engine Make	NA	Kirloskar HA 494

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Specifications

Mixer Dimensions

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)	Conmat MR 60C
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA	NA
Mixer Length
6250 mm / 6400 mm	5590 mm
Mixer Height
2650 mm	2630 mm
Over Hang
NA	NA
Mixer Width
2400 mm	2350 mm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle	3 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA	NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
3900 kg	3850 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
16800 kg	NA

Performance

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)	Conmat MR 60C
Nomial Filling Capacity
7.0 m³	6.0 m³
Geometric Volume
12750 L	11100 L
Water Line Volume
8250 L	NA
Filling Ratio
55%	54%
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm	0-14 rpm
Drum Diameter
2300 mm	2267 mm
Water Tank Capacity
450 L	450 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA	NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA	NA
Water Meter Scale
NA	NA
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine	P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)	70 HP (52 kW)
Engine Make
NA	Kirloskar HA 494

Popular Comparisons with Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)

Schwing Stetter Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)

4.5 rating

Price Available Soon

Schwing Stetter Schwing Stetter AM 6 (C2)

4.5 rating

Price Available Soon

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) VS Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)

Conmat MR 60C

Overview Summary

Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer

Pros:

Cons:

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixer

Pros:

Cons:

Pros:

Cons:

Closing Recommendation

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features

Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer

Pros:

Cons:

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixer

Pros:

Cons:

Pros:

Cons:

Closing Recommendation

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Key Highlights

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Key Highlights

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Specifications

Mixer Dimension

Performance

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Specifications

Mixer Dimensions

Performance

Popular Comparisons with Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)

Popular Comparisons with Conmat MR 60C

Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 60C - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India

Let's get started

Disclaimer

Compare