LiuGong 611 VS ACE ASD 115 Compactor

₹ 34-36 Lakhs^*

LiuGong 611

Weight

11000 kg
Drum Width

2130 mm
Engine

KOEL 110 HP
Static Load

29.1 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

270/125 kN
Travel Speed

0-13 km/hr

Soil Compactor

₹ 32-34 Lakhs^*

ACE ASD 115

Weight

11000 kg
Drum Width

2130 mm
Engine

M&M 112 HP
Static Load

30.52 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

254/176 kN
Travel Speed

0–29 km/hr

Soil Compactor

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

LiuGong 611 VS ACE ASD 115 Compactor

LiuGong 611

₹ 34-36 Lakhs

ACE ASD 115

₹ 32-34 Lakhs

Particulars	LiuGong 611	ACE ASD 115

ACE ASD 115 vs LiuGong 611: Which Soil Compactor to Buy?

Both are single drum soil compactors used for roads, embankments and plot filling. The ACE ASD 115, from ACE, climbs steeper slopes, carries more fuel, and moves faster on site. The LiuGong 611, from LiuGong, gives a higher top-end centrifugal force, uses articulated steering with a limited slip differential, and comes with a longer, hour-capped warranty.

If your work covers steep ground and you want faster travel between spots, the ACE ASD 115's gradeability and speed help you finish jobs quicker. If you want extra warranty cover with a clear hour limit, or better traction on uneven ground from the articulated steering, the LiuGong 611 is worth a look. See the full compactor range or read our compactor buying guide.

ACE ASD 115 Soil Compactor

Pros:

Offers a high Max. Gradeability of 45% for steep terrain
High centrifugal force (High/Low) of 254/176 kN for efficient compaction
Travel speed matches working speed at 0–29 km/hr, indicating quick maneuverability on site
Larger fuel tank capacity (315 L) for extended operation periods
Greater static linear load of 30.52 kg/cm which can lead to better compaction results

Cons:

Lower vibration frequency on high setting than LiuGong 611 at 40 Hz
Engine power slightly higher, but may not translate into significant performance gains
The warranty period is less comprehensive without specified hour coverage

LiuGong 611 Soil Compactor

Pros:

Delivers a higher centrifugal force on high setting of 270 kN for superior compaction in specific cases
Offers a wider range of vibration frequencies at 32/34 Hz catering to different compaction needs
Articulated steering for better maneuverability with limited slip differential
Longer warranty period with hour coverage of 1 Yr./2000 hr. providing more security to the buyer
Larger engine crankcase (8.5 L) and coolant capacity (18 L) might benefit engine cooling and oil change intervals

Cons:

Lower Max. Gradeability of 35% may limit effectiveness on steep slopes
Working and Travel Speeds are lower than ACE ASD 115 which could imply slower operational and transit speeds
Slightly smaller fuel tank at 280 L might require more frequent refueling under heavy operation

Closing Recommendation

Both the ACE ASD 115 and the LiuGong 611 handle regular soil compaction on roads and embankments. Choose the ACE ASD 115 when your site has steep slopes and you want higher speed and a bigger fuel tank for long days. Choose the LiuGong 611 when a longer warranty with a clear hour limit and better traction on uneven ground matter more to you. So match the machine to your work: ACE ASD 115 for slopes, speed and fuel range, LiuGong 611 for warranty cover and traction.