LiuGong 611 VS L&T 1190 Compactor

₹ 34-36 Lakhs^*

LiuGong 611

Weight

11000 kg
Drum Width

2130 mm
Engine

KOEL 110 HP
Static Load

29.1 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

270/125 kN
Travel Speed

0-13 km/hr

Soil Compactor

₹ 30-32 Lakhs^*

L&T 1190

Weight

11050 kg
Drum Width

2100 mm
Engine

M&M 102 HP
Static Load

30.5 kg/cm
CF - Hi/Low

258/169 kN
Travel Speed

12.0 km/hr

Soil Compactor

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

LiuGong 611 VS L&T 1190 Compactor

LiuGong 611

₹ 34-36 Lakhs

L&T 1190

₹ 30-32 Lakhs

Particulars	LiuGong 611	L&T 1190

LiuGong 611 vs L&T 1190: Which One to Buy?

Both are heavy soil compactors for roads and big ground work. The tables below give the full numbers. Here is the simple difference. The LiuGong 611 has a stronger engine, more shaking force and a bigger fuel tank, so it presses ground harder and runs longer between diesel fills. The L&T 1190 comes with a fuel-saving engine, climbs steeper slopes and has standard telematics, so you can track the machine and it uses less diesel.

So the choice is more raw power, or slope climbing plus tracking and fuel saving. For hard, deep compaction and long shifts far from a fuel point, the LiuGong fits. For hilly sites, lower diesel use and machines you want to watch from the office, the L&T fits. See the LiuGong compactor range, the L&T compactor range, or our compactor guide to match the machine to your work.

LiuGong 611 Soil Compactor Roller

Pros:

Powered by a 110 HP Kirloskar engine with CEV Stage IV compliance
Generates up to 270 kN centrifugal force for effective compaction
Large drum width of 2,130 mm for efficient coverage
Operating weight of around 11,000 kg ensures deep, uniform compaction
Higher gradeability at 35%
Larger fuel tank capacity of 280 L

Cons:

Slightly lower vibration frequency on high setting compared to L&T 1190
Higher operational weight might not be ideal for applications requiring lighter equipment

L&T 1190 Soil Compactor Roller

Pros:

Static linear load of 30.5 kg/cm can achieve uniform compaction
Designed for fuel efficiency with a 102 HP Mahindra MTorque CEV-V engine
Higher max gradeability of 40% enhances capability on slopes
Includes standard telematics for equipment monitoring
Longer wheelbase (3000 mm) may improve stability
Oscillation feature available for better compaction in uneven terrains

Cons:

Max power is slightly lower at 102 HP compared to LiuGong 611
Fuel tank capacity is less at 200 L which may require more frequent refueling
Drum shell thickness not specified on DesiMachines.com site

Closing Recommendation

Both compactors do heavy road and ground work, so pick by your site and how you run it. Choose the LiuGong 611 when you need harder, deeper compaction, more shaking force, and a bigger fuel tank for long shifts far from a fuel point. Choose the L&T 1190 when your sites have slopes, you want lower diesel use, and you want standard telematics to track the machine and its health. So match the machine to your work: LiuGong 611 for raw power and long runs, L&T 1190 for slope climbing, fuel saving and easy tracking.