Volvo L120H vs Liebherr L566: the two differ on 72 of 85 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (Volvo 255 HP vs John Deere 272 HP), Max Torque (1125 Nm @ 1600 rpm vs 1353 Nm @ 1400 rpm), Operating Weight (19000 - 21600 kg vs 23450 kg), Weight (21600 kg vs 23450 kg). The other 13 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Jul 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Volvo L120H
Liebherr L566
Volvo L120H
VS
Liebherr L566
Wheel Loader
Volvo L120H vs Liebherr L566: the two differ on 72 of 85 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (Volvo 255 HP vs John Deere 272 HP), Max Torque (1125 Nm @ 1600 rpm vs 1353 Nm @ 1400 rpm), Operating Weight (19000 - 21600 kg vs 23450 kg), Weight (21600 kg vs 23450 kg). The other 13 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Jul 2026
Volvo L120H
Price Available Soon
Liebherr L566
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Volvo L120H
Liebherr L566
Liebherr L566 vs Volvo L120H: Which One to Buy?
The simple split is working hours against travel time. The Liebherr L566 has more engine power at a lower engine speed, a larger fuel tank and a stronger hydraulic system, so it works longer and lifts harder. The Volvo L120H travels faster between points and uses a common rail engine tuned for efficient running. Both are large loaders for quarries and yards.
Choose by how far the loader carries material. If it works at one stockpile all shift, loading trucks close by, the bigger fuel tank and stronger hydraulics on the Liebherr keep it working with fewer stops. If it has to carry material some distance, or move between a crusher, a hopper and a stock yard, the higher top speed on the Volvo saves time on every trip. One point to check on the Volvo is whether air conditioning is included, because it may be an option rather than standard. See the Liebherr range, the Volvo range, or read our wheel loader buying guide.
Volvo L120H Wheel Loader
Pros:
Advanced turbocharged diesel engine with common rail fuel injection
High power and torque at lower RPM ranges for efficient operation
Good top forward speed of 40 km/h for quick transit
Ample service and parking brake systems ensuring operational safety
Impressive breakout force for tough excavation tasks
Cons:
Optional air conditioning may not be standard
Smaller fuel tank capacity compared to the Liebherr L566
Lower tipping load capacities in comparison
Liebherr L566 Wheel Loader
Pros:
Higher engine power at a lower RPM delivering efficient performance
Larger fuel tank for extended operation periods
Higher hydraulic system pressure and pump flow for better work efficiency
Standard air conditioning for operator comfort
Greater payload and tipping load making it suitable for heavy-duty tasks
Cons:
Hydrostatic transmission may offer less mechanical efficiency than powershift
Higher operating weight could impact maneuverability and fuel consumption
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both are large wheel loaders, so pick by how far your material travels. Choose the Liebherr L566 when the loader works at one stockpile all shift, when a larger fuel tank means fewer stops, when a stronger hydraulic system fills the bucket faster in packed material, and when smooth hydrostatic control helps in tight loading. Choose the Volvo L120H when the loader carries material between a stockpile, a crusher and a hopper and higher travel speed shortens every trip, and when an efficient common rail engine and powershift drive keep your fuel cost down on longer runs. So match the machine to your work: Liebherr L566 for hard loading at one face, Volvo L120H for carrying material across a site.
Volvo L120H Vs Liebherr L566 Wheel Loader Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Volvo L120H wheel loader is a robust and versatile payloader and front-end loader designed for heavy-duty construction, mining, and material-handling tasks. It uses a Volvo D8L diesel engine from Volvo Construction Equipment that generates around 203 kW (276 hp), with high torque, merging strong performance with fuel-efficient operation. The machine has a bucket capacity ranging from 2.6 to 9.5 m³, an operating weight of 19,000 to 21,600 kg, and a static tipping load of about 12,500 kg, ensuring stability and productivity at demanding job sites. This Volvo wheel loader combines power, durability, and operator comfort for top-notch performance.
The Liebherr L566 wheel loader handles heavy-duty lifting and transportation, making this wheel loader a trusted choice for Indian cement and port operations.
Liebherr L566 vs Volvo L120H: Which One to Buy?
The simple split is working hours against travel time. The Liebherr L566 has more engine power at a lower engine speed, a larger fuel tank and a stronger hydraulic system, so it works longer and lifts harder. The Volvo L120H travels faster between points and uses a common rail engine tuned for efficient running. Both are large loaders for quarries and yards.
Choose by how far the loader carries material. If it works at one stockpile all shift, loading trucks close by, the bigger fuel tank and stronger hydraulics on the Liebherr keep it working with fewer stops. If it has to carry material some distance, or move between a crusher, a hopper and a stock yard, the higher top speed on the Volvo saves time on every trip. One point to check on the Volvo is whether air conditioning is included, because it may be an option rather than standard. See the Liebherr range, the Volvo range, or read our wheel loader buying guide.
Volvo L120H Wheel Loader
Pros:
Advanced turbocharged diesel engine with common rail fuel injection
High power and torque at lower RPM ranges for efficient operation
Good top forward speed of 40 km/h for quick transit
Ample service and parking brake systems ensuring operational safety
Impressive breakout force for tough excavation tasks
Cons:
Optional air conditioning may not be standard
Smaller fuel tank capacity compared to the Liebherr L566
Lower tipping load capacities in comparison
Liebherr L566 Wheel Loader
Pros:
Higher engine power at a lower RPM delivering efficient performance
Larger fuel tank for extended operation periods
Higher hydraulic system pressure and pump flow for better work efficiency
Standard air conditioning for operator comfort
Greater payload and tipping load making it suitable for heavy-duty tasks
Cons:
Hydrostatic transmission may offer less mechanical efficiency than powershift
Higher operating weight could impact maneuverability and fuel consumption
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both are large wheel loaders, so pick by how far your material travels. Choose the Liebherr L566 when the loader works at one stockpile all shift, when a larger fuel tank means fewer stops, when a stronger hydraulic system fills the bucket faster in packed material, and when smooth hydrostatic control helps in tight loading. Choose the Volvo L120H when the loader carries material between a stockpile, a crusher and a hopper and higher travel speed shortens every trip, and when an efficient common rail engine and powershift drive keep your fuel cost down on longer runs. So match the machine to your work: Liebherr L566 for hard loading at one face, Volvo L120H for carrying material across a site.
Volvo L120H Vs Liebherr L566 Wheel Loader Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Volvo L120H wheel loader is a robust and versatile payloader and front-end loader designed for heavy-duty construction, mining, and material-handling tasks. It uses a Volvo D8L diesel engine from Volvo Construction Equipment that generates around 203 kW (276 hp), with high torque, merging strong performance with fuel-efficient operation. The machine has a bucket capacity ranging from 2.6 to 9.5 m³, an operating weight of 19,000 to 21,600 kg, and a static tipping load of about 12,500 kg, ensuring stability and productivity at demanding job sites. This Volvo wheel loader combines power, durability, and operator comfort for top-notch performance.
The Liebherr L566 wheel loader handles heavy-duty lifting and transportation, making this wheel loader a trusted choice for Indian cement and port operations.
72 differ · 13 identical
Key highlights: Volvo L120H vs Liebherr L566 Wheel Loader
Volvo L120H
Liebherr L566
Engine Make
Volvo D8L
John Deere 6090HFL75
Max Torque
1125 Nm @ 1600 rpm
1353 Nm @ 1400 rpm
Fuel Tank
270 L
450 L
Hydraulic System
128 L/min
290 L/min
Min. Ground Clearance
430 mm
535 mm
Payload
NA
7140 kg
Steering Angle
±40°
±38°
Drive Type
4-wheel drive (4WD)
4-wheel drive (4WD)
Wheelbase
3200 mm
3820 mm
Tyres
23.5 R25 L3
26.5R25 L3
Max. Breakout Force
170 kN
190 kN
Overall Length
8240 mm
9200 mm
Warranty
1 Yr. / 2000 hr.
1 Yr. / 2000 hr.
AC Cabin
Optional
Standard
GPS
Standard
Optional
Key highlights: Volvo L120H vs Liebherr L566 Wheel Loader
Volvo L120H
Liebherr L566
Engine Make
Volvo D8L
John Deere 6090HFL75
Max Torque
1125 Nm @ 1600 rpm
1353 Nm @ 1400 rpm
Fuel Tank
270 L
450 L
Hydraulic System
128 L/min
290 L/min
Min. Ground Clearance
430 mm
535 mm
Payload
NA
7140 kg
Steering Angle
±40°
±38°
Drive Type
4-wheel drive (4WD)
4-wheel drive (4WD)
Wheelbase
3200 mm
3820 mm
Tyres
23.5 R25 L3
26.5R25 L3
Max. Breakout Force
170 kN
190 kN
Overall Length
8240 mm
9200 mm
Warranty
1 Yr. / 2000 hr.
1 Yr. / 2000 hr.
AC Cabin
Optional
Standard
GPS
Standard
Optional
Full specifications: Volvo L120H vs Liebherr L566 Wheel Loader
Engine
Volvo L120H
Liebherr L566
Engine Make
Volvo D8L
John Deere 6090HFL75
Engine Type
Turbocharged diesel engine with an advanced Common rail fuel injection system.
Water-cooled; turbo charged; intercooled; Electronic Common Rail high-pressure injection
Volvo dual‑circuit system with nitrogen‑charged accumulators; outboard‑mounted; hydraulically operated; oil‑cooled wet disc brakes with automatic declutch (via Contronic)
Self-locking of the hydrostatic driveline (acting on all four wheels) and additional pumpaccumulator brake system with wet multi- disc brakes (two seperate brake circuits)
Parking
Fully sealed; wet multi‑disc brake built into the transmission (spring‑applied and electro‑hydraulically released)
Electro-hydraulically actuated spring-loaded disc brake system on the transmission
Steering System
Volvo L120H
Liebherr L566
Type
Load-Sensing Hydrostatic Articulated Steering
Load-sensing articulated steering
Steering-Angle
±40°
±38°
Axles And Final Drive
Volvo L120H
Liebherr L566
Front Axle
Fixed (AWB 31)
Fixed
Rear Axle
Oscillating (AWB 30)
Centre pivot & oscillating
Oscillating Angle
±13°
±13°
Speed
Volvo L120H
Liebherr L566
Max. Forward Speed
40 km/h
40 km/h
Max. Reverse Speed
NA
NA
Hydraulic System
Volvo L120H
Liebherr L566
System Type
Load‑Sensing
Load-sensing
Pump Type
Variable Displacement Axial Piston Pump
Swash plate type variable flow pump
Maximum Pump Flow
128 L/min
290 L/min
System Pressure
290 bar
380 bar
Special Refill Capacities
Volvo L120H
Liebherr L566
Fuel Tank
270 L
450 L
Hydraulic System
NA
280 L
Engine Oil
30 L
34 L
Cooling System
38 L
55 L
Rear Axle Oil
41 L
42 L
Front Axle Oil
36 L
42 L
Hydraulic Tank
140 L
160 L
Transmission Oil
38 L
12.5 L
Def Tank
NA
20 L
Dimensions
Volvo L120H
Liebherr L566
Overall Length With Bucket
8240 mm
9200 mm
Wheel Base
3200 mm
3820 mm
Height Over Cab
3380 mm
3590 mm
Height Over Exhaust
NA
3315 mm
Min Grond Clearance
430 mm
535 mm
Width Over Tyres
2670 mm
2960 mm
Wheel Tread
2070 mm
2230 mm
Tyre Size
23.5 R25 L3
26.5R25 L3
Performance
Volvo L120H
Liebherr L566
Bucket Capacity
2.6 - 9.5 m³
4.2 m³
Bucket Width
3000 mm
3000 mm
Payload
NA
7140 kg
Tipping Load Straight
14590 kg
18150 kg
Tipping Load Full Turn
12500 kg
15900 kg
Max. Breakout Force
170 kN
190 kN
Operating Weight
19000 - 21600 kg
23450 kg
Max Dump Angle
50°
NA
Bucket Roll Back Angle Full Height
54°
NA
Bucket Roll Back At Carry
45°
NA
Bucket Roll Back At Ground Level
42°
NA
Dumping Height, Fully Raised
2840 mm
3090 mm
Dumping Reach, Fully Raised
1250 mm
1305 mm
Max. Hinge Pin Height
4100 mm
4360 mm
Max. Digging Depth
NA
100 mm
Turning Radius Over Tyres
5730 mm
7110 mm
Turning Radius Over Bucket
6450 mm
7690 mm
Full specifications: Volvo L120H vs Liebherr L566 Wheel Loader
Engine
Volvo L120H
Liebherr L566
Engine Make
Volvo D8L
John Deere 6090HFL75
Engine Type
Turbocharged diesel engine with an advanced Common rail fuel injection system.
Water-cooled; turbo charged; intercooled; Electronic Common Rail high-pressure injection
Volvo dual‑circuit system with nitrogen‑charged accumulators; outboard‑mounted; hydraulically operated; oil‑cooled wet disc brakes with automatic declutch (via Contronic)
Self-locking of the hydrostatic driveline (acting on all four wheels) and additional pumpaccumulator brake system with wet multi- disc brakes (two seperate brake circuits)
Parking
Fully sealed; wet multi‑disc brake built into the transmission (spring‑applied and electro‑hydraulically released)
Electro-hydraulically actuated spring-loaded disc brake system on the transmission
Questions buyers ask about the Volvo L120H vs Liebherr L566
Ans.
The Liebherr L566 runs longer because its fuel tank is larger. On a busy quarry shift that means fewer trips to the bowser and more time loading. The Volvo L120H holds less fuel but is tuned to use it efficiently, so on lighter work the difference in stops is smaller than the tank size suggests.
Ans.
The Volvo L120H travels faster, so if the loader carries material between a stockpile and a crusher or hopper, each trip takes less time. Over a shift that adds up to more loads. The Liebherr is slower on the move but pushes harder into the pile, which suits short cycles at one face.
Ans.
The Liebherr L566 lifts and digs harder. It has more engine power delivered at a lower engine speed and a higher hydraulic pressure and flow, so the bucket fills faster in a tight, packed stockpile. The Volvo has strong torque low down too but is set up more for smooth, efficient running.
Ans.
Check this before you sign. On the Volvo L120H air conditioning may be an option rather than standard, while the Liebherr is normally supplied with a full cabin. In hot Indian conditions a cool cabin keeps the driver working steadily all afternoon, so make sure both quotations include it.
Ans.
The Liebherr uses a hydrostatic drive, which gives very smooth control at low speed and is easy on the driver in tight loading. The Volvo uses a powershift setup, which is efficient on longer travel. Pick hydrostatic for constant short cycles at a face, and powershift when the loader travels a lot.
Volvo L120H Vs Liebherr L566 - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Volvo L120H Vs Liebherr L566 price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
