Volvo L120H vs Komatsu WA480-6A: the two differ on 72 of 85 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (Volvo 255 HP vs Komatsu 300 HP), Max Torque (1125 Nm @ 1600 rpm vs NA), Operating Weight (19000 - 21600 kg vs 25005 - 25155 kg), Weight (21600 kg vs 25155 kg). The other 13 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Volvo L120H
Komatsu WA480-6A
Volvo L120H
VS
Komatsu WA480-6A
Wheel Loader
Volvo L120H vs Komatsu WA480-6A: the two differ on 72 of 85 listed specs. The main differences are Engine (Volvo 255 HP vs Komatsu 300 HP), Max Torque (1125 Nm @ 1600 rpm vs NA), Operating Weight (19000 - 21600 kg vs 25005 - 25155 kg), Weight (21600 kg vs 25155 kg). The other 13 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Volvo L120H
Price Available Soon
Komatsu WA480-6A
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Volvo L120H
Komatsu WA480-6A
Komatsu WA480-6A vs Volvo L120H Wheel Loader: Which One to Buy?
The Komatsu WA480-6A and the Volvo L120H are both wheel loaders for moving and loading material on site. The Komatsu brings more raw power, which suits heavy quarry and mining loading where you push and lift big loads all day. The Volvo turns tighter and handles a wider range of bucket sizes, which suits general construction sites and jobs that change often.
If your work stays mostly in one heavy task, like loading trucks at a quarry, the extra power of the Komatsu pays off. If your site work changes from day to day and you need to move around tight spaces often, the Volvo's easier handling helps more. Browse the full Volvo wheel loader range, all wheel loaders, or read the wheel loader guide to plan your purchase.
Komatsu WA480-6A
Pros:
Higher engine power at 300 HP compared to Volvo's 255 HP
Larger piston displacement at 11.04 L providing robust engine performance
Higher breakout force of 212 kN suggesting better digging capabilities
Larger bucket capacity range of 3.8 – 6.1 m³ increases the versatility for different tasks
Longer wheelbase at 3450 mm could enhance machine stability
Cons:
Heavier operating weight may restrict maneuverability and increase fuel consumption
Lower maximum dump angle of 45° compared to Volvo's 50°
Minimal information on turning radius, an important aspect in maneuverability
Volvo L120H
Pros:
Greater steering angle of ±40°, indicating a smaller turning radius for improved maneuverability over the Komatsu model
A wider range of bucket capacities from 2.6 - 9.5 m³ allows for greater adaptability to different workloads
Optimized fuel consumption due to advanced engine with Common rail fuel injection system
Cons:
Lower engine power at 255 HP may result in reduced performance in heavy-duty tasks
Smaller piston displacement which could mean lower engine efficiency under certain conditions
Lower tipping load both straight and full turn compared to Komatsu, which can limit the load handling capacity
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Think about the kind of loading you do most, not the biggest load you might ever handle. The Komatsu WA480-6A suits buyers who need strong pushing power and a large bucket for heavy quarry or mining loading. The Volvo L120H suits buyers who want easier handling and a wider range of bucket sizes for varied, everyday construction work. So match the machine to your work: Komatsu WA480-6A for heavy, repeated loading, Volvo L120H for varied site work and easier handling.
Volvo L120H Vs Komatsu WA480-6A Wheel Loader Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Volvo L120H wheel loader is a robust and versatile payloader and front-end loader designed for heavy-duty construction, mining, and material-handling tasks. It uses a Volvo D8L diesel engine from Volvo Construction Equipment that generates around 203 kW (276 hp), with high torque, merging strong performance with fuel-efficient operation. The machine has a bucket capacity ranging from 2.6 to 9.5 m³, an operating weight of 19,000 to 21,600 kg, and a static tipping load of about 12,500 kg, ensuring stability and productivity at demanding job sites. This Volvo wheel loader combines power, durability, and operator comfort for top-notch performance.
With enhanced load capacity, the Komatsu WA480-6A wheel loader meets the rigorous demands of India’s construction and mining sectors, making this wheel loader ideal for heavy-duty material handling applications.
Komatsu WA480-6A vs Volvo L120H Wheel Loader: Which One to Buy?
The Komatsu WA480-6A and the Volvo L120H are both wheel loaders for moving and loading material on site. The Komatsu brings more raw power, which suits heavy quarry and mining loading where you push and lift big loads all day. The Volvo turns tighter and handles a wider range of bucket sizes, which suits general construction sites and jobs that change often.
If your work stays mostly in one heavy task, like loading trucks at a quarry, the extra power of the Komatsu pays off. If your site work changes from day to day and you need to move around tight spaces often, the Volvo's easier handling helps more. Browse the full Volvo wheel loader range, all wheel loaders, or read the wheel loader guide to plan your purchase.
Komatsu WA480-6A
Pros:
Higher engine power at 300 HP compared to Volvo's 255 HP
Larger piston displacement at 11.04 L providing robust engine performance
Higher breakout force of 212 kN suggesting better digging capabilities
Larger bucket capacity range of 3.8 – 6.1 m³ increases the versatility for different tasks
Longer wheelbase at 3450 mm could enhance machine stability
Cons:
Heavier operating weight may restrict maneuverability and increase fuel consumption
Lower maximum dump angle of 45° compared to Volvo's 50°
Minimal information on turning radius, an important aspect in maneuverability
Volvo L120H
Pros:
Greater steering angle of ±40°, indicating a smaller turning radius for improved maneuverability over the Komatsu model
A wider range of bucket capacities from 2.6 - 9.5 m³ allows for greater adaptability to different workloads
Optimized fuel consumption due to advanced engine with Common rail fuel injection system
Cons:
Lower engine power at 255 HP may result in reduced performance in heavy-duty tasks
Smaller piston displacement which could mean lower engine efficiency under certain conditions
Lower tipping load both straight and full turn compared to Komatsu, which can limit the load handling capacity
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Think about the kind of loading you do most, not the biggest load you might ever handle. The Komatsu WA480-6A suits buyers who need strong pushing power and a large bucket for heavy quarry or mining loading. The Volvo L120H suits buyers who want easier handling and a wider range of bucket sizes for varied, everyday construction work. So match the machine to your work: Komatsu WA480-6A for heavy, repeated loading, Volvo L120H for varied site work and easier handling.
Volvo L120H Vs Komatsu WA480-6A Wheel Loader Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Volvo L120H wheel loader is a robust and versatile payloader and front-end loader designed for heavy-duty construction, mining, and material-handling tasks. It uses a Volvo D8L diesel engine from Volvo Construction Equipment that generates around 203 kW (276 hp), with high torque, merging strong performance with fuel-efficient operation. The machine has a bucket capacity ranging from 2.6 to 9.5 m³, an operating weight of 19,000 to 21,600 kg, and a static tipping load of about 12,500 kg, ensuring stability and productivity at demanding job sites. This Volvo wheel loader combines power, durability, and operator comfort for top-notch performance.
With enhanced load capacity, the Komatsu WA480-6A wheel loader meets the rigorous demands of India’s construction and mining sectors, making this wheel loader ideal for heavy-duty material handling applications.
72 differ · 13 identical
Key highlights: Volvo L120H vs Komatsu WA480-6A Wheel Loader
Volvo L120H
Komatsu WA480-6A
Engine Make
Volvo D8L
Komatsu SAA6D125E-5
Max Torque
1125 Nm @ 1600 rpm
NA
Fuel Tank
270 L
413 L
Hydraulic System
128 L/min
260 L/min
Min. Ground Clearance
430 mm
525 mm
Payload
NA
NA
Steering Angle
±40°
±35°
Drive Type
4-wheel drive (4WD)
4-wheel drive (4WD)
Wheelbase
3200 mm
3450 mm
Tyres
23.5 R25 L3
26.5-25 tires
Max. Breakout Force
170 kN
212 kN
Overall Length
8240 mm
9170 mm
Warranty
1 Yr. / 2000 hr.
1 Yr. / 3000 hr.
AC Cabin
Optional
Optional
GPS
Standard
Standard
Key highlights: Volvo L120H vs Komatsu WA480-6A Wheel Loader
Volvo L120H
Komatsu WA480-6A
Engine Make
Volvo D8L
Komatsu SAA6D125E-5
Max Torque
1125 Nm @ 1600 rpm
NA
Fuel Tank
270 L
413 L
Hydraulic System
128 L/min
260 L/min
Min. Ground Clearance
430 mm
525 mm
Payload
NA
NA
Steering Angle
±40°
±35°
Drive Type
4-wheel drive (4WD)
4-wheel drive (4WD)
Wheelbase
3200 mm
3450 mm
Tyres
23.5 R25 L3
26.5-25 tires
Max. Breakout Force
170 kN
212 kN
Overall Length
8240 mm
9170 mm
Warranty
1 Yr. / 2000 hr.
1 Yr. / 3000 hr.
AC Cabin
Optional
Optional
GPS
Standard
Standard
Full specifications: Volvo L120H vs Komatsu WA480-6A Wheel Loader
Engine
Volvo L120H
Komatsu WA480-6A
Engine Make
Volvo D8L
Komatsu SAA6D125E-5
Engine Type
Turbocharged diesel engine with an advanced Common rail fuel injection system.
Questions buyers ask about the Volvo L120H vs Komatsu WA480-6A
Ans.
The Komatsu WA480-6A suits quarry and mining loading better, since its stronger engine and pushing force handle heavy, repeated loads well. The Volvo L120H can still do this work but is built more for general site versatility. If your main job is loading trucks all day at one site, the Komatsu fits that task.
Ans.
The Volvo L120H is known for a comfortable cabin with good visibility around the machine, which helps drivers stay alert on long shifts. The Komatsu WA480-6A also offers a solid cabin but is built more around raw loading power. Ask to sit in both before you decide, since comfort affects daily output.
Ans.
Both Komatsu and Volvo are well-known, trusted names, so either sells reasonably well later. The Komatsu WA480-6A can appeal to buyers who value power for heavy loading work. The Volvo L120H can appeal to buyers who want an easy-to-handle loader for varied site work. Check demand for both in your area.
Ans.
It can, because its bigger engine and heavier build tend to use more fuel over a full shift. The Volvo L120H is built with fuel use in mind and can be lighter on running cost for general loading work. If your jobs need the extra power daily, the Komatsu's higher fuel use is often worth it.
Ans.
Yes, banks, finance companies and dealers offer loans for both the Komatsu WA480-6A and the Volvo L120H. Your monthly payment depends on your down payment and your credit record. Compare a few lenders, and also think about which machine fits your daily work before you commit to a loan.
Volvo L120H Vs Komatsu WA480-6A - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Volvo L120H Vs Komatsu WA480-6A price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
