Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
VS
Conmat MR 80C
Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) vs Conmat MR 80C: the two differ on 31 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Schwing Stetter Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Drum Size (10.0 m³ vs 8.0 m³), Mixer Weight (5100 kg vs 3850 kg), Capacity (17080 L vs 14400 L). The other 10 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Conmat MR 80C
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
VS
Conmat MR 80C
Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) vs Conmat MR 80C: the two differ on 31 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Schwing Stetter Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Drum Size (10.0 m³ vs 8.0 m³), Mixer Weight (5100 kg vs 3850 kg), Capacity (17080 L vs 14400 L). The other 10 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Price Available Soon
Conmat MR 80C
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Conmat MR 80C
Conmat MR 80C vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2): Faster Mixing or Bigger Load
The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) carries the bigger load here, 10.0 cubic metres against 8.0 cubic metres on the Conmat MR 80C, with a 4-axle configuration that helps spread the weight for better stability. It also holds more water at 650 litres and runs a slightly stronger 106 HP engine. The trade-off is rotation speed, the MR 80C spins its drum faster, up to 14 rpm against 12 rpm on the AM 10 (C2), which can help keep the mix moving on shorter routes.
Size and weight follow the capacity gap. The AM 10 (C2) is longer and heavier empty at 5100 kg, which can limit payload and needs more room to maneuver on a tight site. The lighter Conmat MR 80C is easier to place where space is limited. Check the concrete mixer buying guide and the full concrete mixer range before you decide.
Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Delivers 8.0 cu m nominal capacity suitable for demanding sites
Rotation speed of 0-14 rpm allows for thorough concrete mixing
Comes equipped with a water tank capacity of 600 L
Powered by an engine with 100 HP (74 kW)
Cons:
Lacks information on the shell thickness, which is crucial for durability assessment
Mixer weight with concrete is not specified
Water pump pressure and outlet details are missing, limiting the assessment of water system efficiency
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer
Pros:
Has a higher nominal capacity of 10.0 cu m for larger batch mixing
Features a 4 Axel configuration for potentially better stability and distribution of weight
Comes with a larger water tank capacity of 650 L compared to Conmat MR 80C
Slightly more powerful engine with 106 HP (79 kW)
Cons:
Lower rotation speed of 0-12 rpm, which may affect mixing efficiency
Longer mixer length which could impact maneuverability in some situations
Heavier mixer weight when empty at 5100 kg, which may limit payload
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
For heavy-duty operations that need higher capacity and steady stability under load, the Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)'s 10 cubic metre capacity and 4-axle setup carry more concrete per trip. For sites where faster mixing and easier maneuvering matter more than maximum capacity, the Conmat MR 80C's quicker drum rotation and smaller footprint are the better fit. So match the machine to your work: the Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) for higher-capacity heavy-duty operations, and the Conmat MR 80C for faster mixing on tighter sites.
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer also has a 10 cu m nominal capacity. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer is optimized for consistent concrete batching in heavy-duty operations.
The Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer is made for demanding sites and delivers an 8.0 cu m nominal capacity. This concrete mixer ensures strong concrete delivery performance.
Conmat MR 80C vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2): Faster Mixing or Bigger Load
The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) carries the bigger load here, 10.0 cubic metres against 8.0 cubic metres on the Conmat MR 80C, with a 4-axle configuration that helps spread the weight for better stability. It also holds more water at 650 litres and runs a slightly stronger 106 HP engine. The trade-off is rotation speed, the MR 80C spins its drum faster, up to 14 rpm against 12 rpm on the AM 10 (C2), which can help keep the mix moving on shorter routes.
Size and weight follow the capacity gap. The AM 10 (C2) is longer and heavier empty at 5100 kg, which can limit payload and needs more room to maneuver on a tight site. The lighter Conmat MR 80C is easier to place where space is limited. Check the concrete mixer buying guide and the full concrete mixer range before you decide.
Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Delivers 8.0 cu m nominal capacity suitable for demanding sites
Rotation speed of 0-14 rpm allows for thorough concrete mixing
Comes equipped with a water tank capacity of 600 L
Powered by an engine with 100 HP (74 kW)
Cons:
Lacks information on the shell thickness, which is crucial for durability assessment
Mixer weight with concrete is not specified
Water pump pressure and outlet details are missing, limiting the assessment of water system efficiency
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer
Pros:
Has a higher nominal capacity of 10.0 cu m for larger batch mixing
Features a 4 Axel configuration for potentially better stability and distribution of weight
Comes with a larger water tank capacity of 650 L compared to Conmat MR 80C
Slightly more powerful engine with 106 HP (79 kW)
Cons:
Lower rotation speed of 0-12 rpm, which may affect mixing efficiency
Longer mixer length which could impact maneuverability in some situations
Heavier mixer weight when empty at 5100 kg, which may limit payload
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
For heavy-duty operations that need higher capacity and steady stability under load, the Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)'s 10 cubic metre capacity and 4-axle setup carry more concrete per trip. For sites where faster mixing and easier maneuvering matter more than maximum capacity, the Conmat MR 80C's quicker drum rotation and smaller footprint are the better fit. So match the machine to your work: the Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) for higher-capacity heavy-duty operations, and the Conmat MR 80C for faster mixing on tighter sites.
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer also has a 10 cu m nominal capacity. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer is optimized for consistent concrete batching in heavy-duty operations.
The Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer is made for demanding sites and delivers an 8.0 cu m nominal capacity. This concrete mixer ensures strong concrete delivery performance.
31 differ · 10 identical
Key highlights: Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) vs Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Conmat MR 80C
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O.
Water Line Volume
10720 L
NA
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2300 mm
2267 mm
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
4 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
7500 mm / 8000 mm
6570 mm
Mixer Width
2450 mm
2350 mm
Mixer Height
2752 mm
2655 mm
Engine Power
106 HP (79 kW)
100 HP (74 kW)
Key highlights: Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) vs Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Conmat MR 80C
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O.
Water Line Volume
10720 L
NA
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2300 mm
2267 mm
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
4 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
7500 mm / 8000 mm
6570 mm
Mixer Width
2450 mm
2350 mm
Mixer Height
2752 mm
2655 mm
Engine Power
106 HP (79 kW)
100 HP (74 kW)
Full specifications: Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) vs Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimension
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Conmat MR 80C
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
7500 mm / 8000 mm
6570 mm
Mixer Height
2752 mm
2655 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2450 mm
2350 mm
Truck Specifications
4 Axle
3 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
5100 kg
3850 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
24000 kg
NA
Performance
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Conmat MR 80C
Nomial Filling Capacity
10.0 m³
8.0 m³
Geometric Volume
17080 L
14400 L
Water Line Volume
10720 L
NA
Filling Ratio
58.5%
56%
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Drum Diameter
2300 mm
2267 mm
Water Tank Capacity
650 L
600 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
NA
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O.
Engine Power
106 HP (79 kW)
100 HP (74 kW)
Engine Make
NA
NA
Full specifications: Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) vs Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimensions
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Conmat MR 80C
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
7500 mm / 8000 mm
6570 mm
Mixer Height
2752 mm
2655 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2450 mm
2350 mm
Truck Specifications
4 Axle
3 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
5100 kg
3850 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
24000 kg
NA
Performance
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Conmat MR 80C
Nomial Filling Capacity
10.0 m³
8.0 m³
Geometric Volume
17080 L
14400 L
Water Line Volume
10720 L
NA
Filling Ratio
58.5%
56%
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Drum Diameter
2300 mm
2267 mm
Water Tank Capacity
650 L
600 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
NA
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O.
Engine Power
106 HP (79 kW)
100 HP (74 kW)
Engine Make
NA
NA
Popular Comparisons with Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Questions buyers ask about the Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) vs Conmat MR 80C
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) carries 10.0 cubic metres, more than the Conmat MR 80C's 8.0 cubic metres. For high-volume batch mixing, that extra 2 cubic metres can mean fewer trips.
Ans.
The Conmat MR 80C spins faster, up to 14 rpm against 12 rpm on the Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2). A faster rotation speed can help on shorter routes where quick, thorough mixing matters.
Ans.
The 4-axle setup helps spread the mixer's weight more evenly, which supports better stability when carrying its larger 10 cubic metre load. The Conmat MR 80C does not need this configuration at its lighter capacity.
Ans.
The Conmat MR 80C is easier to maneuver, since the Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) is longer and heavier, which needs more room to turn and move around. Tighter sites tend to favor the smaller machine.
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) has a bigger 650-litre water tank, against 600 litres on the Conmat MR 80C. The extra water supports its larger overall mixing capacity.
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 80C - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 80C price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
