Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
VS
Conmat MR 80C
Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) vs Conmat MR 80C: the two differ on 31 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Schwing Stetter Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Drum Size (9.0 m³ vs 8.0 m³), Mixer Weight (4850 kg vs 3850 kg), Capacity (15850 L vs 14400 L). The other 10 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Conmat MR 80C
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
VS
Conmat MR 80C
Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) vs Conmat MR 80C: the two differ on 31 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Schwing Stetter Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Drum Size (9.0 m³ vs 8.0 m³), Mixer Weight (4850 kg vs 3850 kg), Capacity (15850 L vs 14400 L). The other 10 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Price Available Soon
Conmat MR 80C
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Conmat MR 80C
Conmat MR 80C vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2): Which Transit Mixer to Choose?
The Conmat MR 80C and the Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) are both large-capacity transit mixers for high-demand sites, but they trade off size against ease of movement. The Schwing Stetter carries more concrete per trip and runs a stronger engine, built for heavy, continuous pours. The Conmat is shorter and lighter, which helps it turn and reverse on confined job sites while still carrying a sizeable load.
On a big infrastructure job, extra capacity per trip can save real time, but only if the site has room for a longer truck to turn and park. Weigh site space against your daily concrete demand before choosing. Browse the full transit mixer range and our concrete mixer guide for more help.
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer
Pros:
Higher nominal filling capacity of 9.0 m³ which is suitable for large volume deliveries
More engine power with 106 HP (79 kW)
Higher geometric volume of 15850 L
Bigger water tank capacity of 650 L
Higher mixer height at 2730 mm which might contribute to better discharge
Cons:
Longer mixer length of 7200 mm / 7700 mm could pose challenges in tighter spaces
Heavier empty mixer weight of 4850 kg which could affect fuel efficiency
Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Shorter mixer length of 6570 mm could improve maneuverability in confined areas
Less empty mixer weight of 3850 kg which might offer better fuel economy
Higher drum rotation speed of 0-14 rpm for potentially faster mixing
Cons:
Smaller nominal filling capacity of 8.0 m³
Less powerful engine with 100 HP (74 kW)
Slightly smaller geometric volume of 14400 L
Smaller water tank capacity of 600 L
Slightly lesser mixer height at 2655 mm
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
The Conmat MR 80C and the Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) are both built for high-demand transit mixer work, just with different trade-offs. The Schwing Stetter carries more concrete and runs a stronger engine, suited to heavy, continuous pours. The Conmat is shorter and lighter, giving it an edge on tighter job sites. So match the machine to your work: Schwing Stetter AM 9 for heavy, high-volume pours, Conmat MR 80C for tighter job sites needing easy maneuvering.
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer has a 9 cu m nominal capacity. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer enables high-volume delivery, making it suitable for demanding infrastructure projects.
The Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer is made for demanding sites and delivers an 8.0 cu m nominal capacity. This concrete mixer ensures strong concrete delivery performance.
Conmat MR 80C vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2): Which Transit Mixer to Choose?
The Conmat MR 80C and the Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) are both large-capacity transit mixers for high-demand sites, but they trade off size against ease of movement. The Schwing Stetter carries more concrete per trip and runs a stronger engine, built for heavy, continuous pours. The Conmat is shorter and lighter, which helps it turn and reverse on confined job sites while still carrying a sizeable load.
On a big infrastructure job, extra capacity per trip can save real time, but only if the site has room for a longer truck to turn and park. Weigh site space against your daily concrete demand before choosing. Browse the full transit mixer range and our concrete mixer guide for more help.
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer
Pros:
Higher nominal filling capacity of 9.0 m³ which is suitable for large volume deliveries
More engine power with 106 HP (79 kW)
Higher geometric volume of 15850 L
Bigger water tank capacity of 650 L
Higher mixer height at 2730 mm which might contribute to better discharge
Cons:
Longer mixer length of 7200 mm / 7700 mm could pose challenges in tighter spaces
Heavier empty mixer weight of 4850 kg which could affect fuel efficiency
Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Shorter mixer length of 6570 mm could improve maneuverability in confined areas
Less empty mixer weight of 3850 kg which might offer better fuel economy
Higher drum rotation speed of 0-14 rpm for potentially faster mixing
Cons:
Smaller nominal filling capacity of 8.0 m³
Less powerful engine with 100 HP (74 kW)
Slightly smaller geometric volume of 14400 L
Smaller water tank capacity of 600 L
Slightly lesser mixer height at 2655 mm
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
The Conmat MR 80C and the Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) are both built for high-demand transit mixer work, just with different trade-offs. The Schwing Stetter carries more concrete and runs a stronger engine, suited to heavy, continuous pours. The Conmat is shorter and lighter, giving it an edge on tighter job sites. So match the machine to your work: Schwing Stetter AM 9 for heavy, high-volume pours, Conmat MR 80C for tighter job sites needing easy maneuvering.
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer has a 9 cu m nominal capacity. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer enables high-volume delivery, making it suitable for demanding infrastructure projects.
The Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer is made for demanding sites and delivers an 8.0 cu m nominal capacity. This concrete mixer ensures strong concrete delivery performance.
31 differ · 10 identical
Key highlights: Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) vs Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Conmat MR 80C
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O.
Water Line Volume
10010 L
NA
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2300 mm
2267 mm
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
4 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
7200 mm / 7700 mm
6570 mm
Mixer Width
2450 mm
2350 mm
Mixer Height
2730 mm
2655 mm
Engine Power
106 HP (79 kW)
100 HP (74 kW)
Key highlights: Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) vs Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Conmat MR 80C
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O.
Water Line Volume
10010 L
NA
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2300 mm
2267 mm
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
4 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
7200 mm / 7700 mm
6570 mm
Mixer Width
2450 mm
2350 mm
Mixer Height
2730 mm
2655 mm
Engine Power
106 HP (79 kW)
100 HP (74 kW)
Full specifications: Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) vs Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimension
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Conmat MR 80C
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
7200 mm / 7700 mm
6570 mm
Mixer Height
2730 mm
2655 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2450 mm
2350 mm
Truck Specifications
4 Axle
3 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
4850 kg
3850 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
21600 kg
NA
Performance
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Conmat MR 80C
Nomial Filling Capacity
9.0 m³
8.0 m³
Geometric Volume
15850 L
14400 L
Water Line Volume
10010 L
NA
Filling Ratio
57%
56%
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Drum Diameter
2300 mm
2267 mm
Water Tank Capacity
650 L
600 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
NA
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O.
Engine Power
106 HP (79 kW)
100 HP (74 kW)
Engine Make
NA
NA
Full specifications: Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) vs Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimensions
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Conmat MR 80C
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
7200 mm / 7700 mm
6570 mm
Mixer Height
2730 mm
2655 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2450 mm
2350 mm
Truck Specifications
4 Axle
3 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
4850 kg
3850 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
21600 kg
NA
Performance
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Conmat MR 80C
Nomial Filling Capacity
9.0 m³
8.0 m³
Geometric Volume
15850 L
14400 L
Water Line Volume
10010 L
NA
Filling Ratio
57%
56%
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Drum Diameter
2300 mm
2267 mm
Water Tank Capacity
650 L
600 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
NA
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O.
Engine Power
106 HP (79 kW)
100 HP (74 kW)
Engine Make
NA
NA
Popular Comparisons with Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Questions buyers ask about the Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) vs Conmat MR 80C
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) carries more concrete per trip, with a 9.0 cu m nominal filling capacity against the Conmat MR 80C's 8.0 cu m. This suits sites that need larger, less frequent loads.
Ans.
The Conmat MR 80C is easier to maneuver on a confined site. It has a shorter mixer length of 6570 mm, which gives it an edge turning and reversing in tighter job site spaces.
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 9 has the stronger engine, at 106 HP against the Conmat MR 80C's 100 HP. The extra power helps it manage its bigger drum and heavier loads.
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 9 holds more water, with a 650 L tank against the Conmat MR 80C's 600 L. A bigger water tank supports longer routes and better drum cleaning between loads.
Ans.
Not always, but it helps a lot on tight sites. The Conmat MR 80C's shorter length makes it easier to move around confined areas, even though it carries a little less concrete than the longer Schwing Stetter AM 9.
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 80C - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 80C price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
