Sunbeam 85 VS Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer

Sunbeam 85 vs Conmat MR 80C: the two differ on 30 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Sunbeam Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Drum Size (8 m³ vs 8.0 m³), Mixer Weight (4450 kg vs 3850 kg), Capacity (14200 L vs 14400 L). The other 11 specs are the same.

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Price Available Soon^*

Sunbeam 85

Drum Size

8 m³
Mixer Weight

4450 kg
Capacity

14200 L
Filling Ratio

59%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Price Available Soon^*

Conmat MR 80C

Drum Size

8.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3850 kg
Capacity

14400 L
Filling Ratio

56%
Water Tank

600 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Add a third machine

What's different: Sunbeam 85 vs Conmat MR 80C

30 specs differ, 11 are identical. The full tables are below.

Spec	Sunbeam 85	Conmat MR 80C
Brand	Sunbeam Transit mixer	Conmat Transit mixer
Drum Size	8 m³	8.0 m³
Mixer Weight	4450 kg	3850 kg
Capacity	14200 L	14400 L
Filling Ratio	59%	56%
Water Tank	450 L	600 L
Drum Drive	Slave Engine/PTO Option	P.T.O.
Shell Thickness	4-6 mm	NA

See all 30 differences ↓

Sunbeam 85 price & full specs →Conmat MR 80C price & full specs →

* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

Sunbeam 85 VS Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Sunbeam 85

Price Available Soon

Conmat MR 80C

Price Available Soon

Particulars	Sunbeam 85	Conmat MR 80C

Conmat MR 80C vs Sunbeam 85: Which Transit Mixer Wins?

Both the Conmat MR 80C and the Sunbeam 85 carry a nominal 8.0 cubic metre load, but they are tuned differently. The Conmat MR 80C is lighter empty, has a slightly larger drum volume, and carries more water, while the Sunbeam 85 runs a stronger engine, fills its drum more efficiently, and publishes fuller water pump details for planning site work.

A crew that wants a lighter truck with more water on board for site flexibility will lean toward the Conmat MR 80C. A crew that wants more engine power and a higher filling ratio for efficient loading will prefer the Sunbeam 85. Browse the full transit mixer range or read our concrete mixer buying guide for more help choosing.

Conmat MR 80C Transit Mixer

Pros:

Slightly larger geometric volume of 14400 L compared to Sunbeam 85
Higher rotation speed range with a maximum of 14 rpm
Larger water tank capacity of 600 L
Lighter empty mixer weight at 3850 kg

Cons:

Lower engine power with 100 HP
Filling ratio less than Sunbeam 85 at 56%

Sunbeam 85 Concrete Transit Mixer

Pros:

Higher engine power with 108.6 HP
Higher filling ratio at 59% indicating potentially more efficient loading
Water pump with higher pressure of 3.5 bar
Larger water pump outlet of 400 L/min and a detailed water meter scale

Cons:

Slightly smaller geometric volume of 14200 L
Smaller water tank capacity of 450 L
Heavier empty mixer weight at 4450 kg

Closing Recommendation

Both mixers carry the same 8.0 cubic metre nominal load, so the choice comes down to smaller trade-offs. Pick the Conmat MR 80C if you want a lighter truck with more water carried on board. Pick the Sunbeam 85 if stronger engine power and a more efficient filling ratio matter more for your routes. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 80C for a lighter build with more water capacity, Sunbeam 85 for stronger power and efficient loading.