Sunbeam 85 vs Conmat MR 70C: the two differ on 29 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Sunbeam Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Drum Size (8 m³ vs 7.0 m³), Mixer Weight (4450 kg vs 3850 kg), Capacity (14200 L vs 12100 L). The other 12 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Sunbeam 85
Conmat MR 70C
Sunbeam 85
VS
Conmat MR 70C
Transit Mixer
Sunbeam 85 vs Conmat MR 70C: the two differ on 29 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Sunbeam Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Drum Size (8 m³ vs 7.0 m³), Mixer Weight (4450 kg vs 3850 kg), Capacity (14200 L vs 12100 L). The other 12 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Sunbeam 85
Price Available Soon
Conmat MR 70C
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Sunbeam 85
Conmat MR 70C
Conmat MR 70C vs Sunbeam 85: Which Transit Mixer Wins for Your Site?
These two mixers are sized for different scales of work. The Conmat MR 70C carries a 7.0 cu m load on a known 70 HP Kirloskar engine and turns its drum quickly, which suits steady, everyday site runs. The Sunbeam 85 steps up to an 8 cu m load with a much stronger 108.6 HP engine, and it shares far more build detail, including shell thickness and water pump pressure.
If your work is steady, urban and mid-scale, the Conmat MR 70C is easier to run day to day. If you move bigger batches on larger sites and want a stronger engine plus full build detail, the Sunbeam 85 is built for that. See more choices in our transit mixer and concrete mixer range, or read the guide to types of concrete mixers.
Conmat MR 70C
Pros:
Designed for steady operations balancing output with urban mobility needs
Nominal filling capacity of 7.0 cubic meters suitable for medium-scale projects
Efficient drum rotation speed of 0-14 rpm
Supported by a 70 HP Kirloskar HA 494 engine
Cons:
Missing detailed specifications such as shell thickness and mixer sub-frame length
Less engine power compared to Sunbeam 85
Sunbeam 85
Pros:
Higher capacity of 8 cubic meters suitable for large-volume batching projects
Strong engine performance with 108.6 HP
Detailed specifications like mixer sub-frame length, shell thickness, and water pump pressure provided
Additional features such as water meter scale and high water pump outlet capacity
Cons:
Heavier empty weight could reduce mobility and increase fuel consumption
Specific engine make is not available for more in-depth comparison
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
These two mixers are built for different scales of work, so choose based on the size of the job. The Conmat MR 70C suits steady, urban and mid-scale sites where a known engine and quick drum turn matter most. The Sunbeam 85 suits larger projects that need a bigger load, a stronger engine and fuller build detail. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 70C for steady mid-scale sites, Sunbeam 85 for larger, high-volume projects.
Sunbeam 85 Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Designed for large-volume batching, the Sunbeam 85 Transit Mixer can handle an 8.0 cu m capacity. This transit mixer is perfect for highways, bridges, and commercial building sites.
The Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer is designed for steady operations and has a nominal capacity of 7.0 cu m. This concrete mixer balances output and urban mobility needs.
Conmat MR 70C vs Sunbeam 85: Which Transit Mixer Wins for Your Site?
These two mixers are sized for different scales of work. The Conmat MR 70C carries a 7.0 cu m load on a known 70 HP Kirloskar engine and turns its drum quickly, which suits steady, everyday site runs. The Sunbeam 85 steps up to an 8 cu m load with a much stronger 108.6 HP engine, and it shares far more build detail, including shell thickness and water pump pressure.
If your work is steady, urban and mid-scale, the Conmat MR 70C is easier to run day to day. If you move bigger batches on larger sites and want a stronger engine plus full build detail, the Sunbeam 85 is built for that. See more choices in our transit mixer and concrete mixer range, or read the guide to types of concrete mixers.
Conmat MR 70C
Pros:
Designed for steady operations balancing output with urban mobility needs
Nominal filling capacity of 7.0 cubic meters suitable for medium-scale projects
Efficient drum rotation speed of 0-14 rpm
Supported by a 70 HP Kirloskar HA 494 engine
Cons:
Missing detailed specifications such as shell thickness and mixer sub-frame length
Less engine power compared to Sunbeam 85
Sunbeam 85
Pros:
Higher capacity of 8 cubic meters suitable for large-volume batching projects
Strong engine performance with 108.6 HP
Detailed specifications like mixer sub-frame length, shell thickness, and water pump pressure provided
Additional features such as water meter scale and high water pump outlet capacity
Cons:
Heavier empty weight could reduce mobility and increase fuel consumption
Specific engine make is not available for more in-depth comparison
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
These two mixers are built for different scales of work, so choose based on the size of the job. The Conmat MR 70C suits steady, urban and mid-scale sites where a known engine and quick drum turn matter most. The Sunbeam 85 suits larger projects that need a bigger load, a stronger engine and fuller build detail. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 70C for steady mid-scale sites, Sunbeam 85 for larger, high-volume projects.
Sunbeam 85 Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Designed for large-volume batching, the Sunbeam 85 Transit Mixer can handle an 8.0 cu m capacity. This transit mixer is perfect for highways, bridges, and commercial building sites.
The Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer is designed for steady operations and has a nominal capacity of 7.0 cu m. This concrete mixer balances output and urban mobility needs.
29 differ · 12 identical
Key highlights: Sunbeam 85 vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Sunbeam 85
Conmat MR 70C
Drum Drive
Slave Engine/PTO Option
Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
NA
NA
Shell Thickness
4-6 mm
NA
Drum diameter
2200 mm
2267 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
6500 mm / 6300 mm
5840 mm
Mixer Width
2450 mm / 2300 mm
2350 mm
Mixer Height
2680 mm
2630 mm
Engine Power
108.6 HP (81 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Key highlights: Sunbeam 85 vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Sunbeam 85
Conmat MR 70C
Drum Drive
Slave Engine/PTO Option
Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
NA
NA
Shell Thickness
4-6 mm
NA
Drum diameter
2200 mm
2267 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
6500 mm / 6300 mm
5840 mm
Mixer Width
2450 mm / 2300 mm
2350 mm
Mixer Height
2680 mm
2630 mm
Engine Power
108.6 HP (81 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Full specifications: Sunbeam 85 vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimension
Sunbeam 85
Conmat MR 70C
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
5510 mm / 5310 mm
NA
Mixer Length
6500 mm / 6300 mm
5840 mm
Mixer Height
2680 mm
2630 mm
Over Hang
1150 mm
NA
Mixer Width
2450 mm / 2300 mm
2350 mm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Shell Thickness
4-6 mm
NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
4450 kg
3850 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
NA
NA
Performance
Sunbeam 85
Conmat MR 70C
Nomial Filling Capacity
8 m³
7.0 m³
Geometric Volume
14200 L
12100 L
Water Line Volume
NA
NA
Filling Ratio
59%
57.80%
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-14 rpm
Drum Diameter
2200 mm
2267 mm
Water Tank Capacity
450 L
450 L
Water Pump Pressure
3.5 bar
NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
400 L/min
NA
Water Meter Scale
0-450 L
NA
Drum Drive
Slave Engine/PTO Option
Slave Engine
Engine Power
108.6 HP (81 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Engine Make
NA
Kirloskar HA 494
Full specifications: Sunbeam 85 vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Questions buyers ask about the Sunbeam 85 vs Conmat MR 70C
Ans.
The Sunbeam 85 carries a bigger load, at 8 cu m nominal capacity, against the Conmat MR 70C's 7.0 cu m.
Ans.
The Sunbeam 85 has a stronger engine, rated at 108.6 HP, well above the Conmat MR 70C's 70 HP Kirloskar engine.
Ans.
The Sunbeam 85 shares more build detail. It lists shell thickness, water pump pressure, subframe length and even a water meter scale, which the Conmat MR 70C does not fully state.
Ans.
The Conmat MR 70C turns the drum faster, at up to 14 rpm, which can help with quicker mixing on smaller, steady jobs.
Ans.
Yes. The Conmat MR 70C runs on a Kirloskar engine, a well-known name, while the Sunbeam 85's engine make is not listed.
Ans.
The Sunbeam 85 suits bigger infrastructure projects better. Its larger load and stronger engine are built for high-volume batching work.
Sunbeam 85 Vs Conmat MR 70C - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Sunbeam 85 Vs Conmat MR 70C price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
