Conmat MR 60C vs Sunbeam 75: the two differ on 27 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Sunbeam Transit mixer), Drum Size (6.0 m³ vs 7.5 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 4090 kg), Capacity (11100 L vs 13060 L). The other 14 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Conmat MR 60C
Sunbeam 75
Conmat MR 60C
VS
Sunbeam 75
Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 60C vs Sunbeam 75: the two differ on 27 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Sunbeam Transit mixer), Drum Size (6.0 m³ vs 7.5 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 4090 kg), Capacity (11100 L vs 13060 L). The other 14 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Conmat MR 60C
Price Available Soon
Sunbeam 75
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Conmat MR 60C
Sunbeam 75
Conmat MR 60C vs Sunbeam 75: Which Transit Mixer to Choose?
The Conmat MR 60C and the Sunbeam 75 both handle regular concrete delivery, but the Sunbeam is built for bigger loads while the Conmat stays lighter and more compact. The Sunbeam 75 offers a choice between Slave Engine and PTO drum drive, giving flexibility in how the drum keeps turning during a pour. The Conmat MR 60C runs a well-known Kirloskar engine and keeps its dimensions smaller, which helps it fit into regional sites with less room to spare.
A drum drive option like PTO can be handy when the truck engine needs rest during a long haul, so ask your dealer how each option works before you decide. See the full transit mixer range and our concrete mixer guide for more help.
Sunbeam 75 Concrete Transit Mixer
Pros:
Higher nominal filling capacity of 7.5 m³
Larger geometric volume of 13060 L
Offers both Slave Engine and PTO options for drum drive
Longer mixer length for potentially greater mixing efficiency
Cons:
Heavier empty weight at 4090 kg
Wider mixer width could pose challenges in narrower sites
Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Truck
Pros:
Lighter empty weight at 3850 kg
Smaller dimensions may be advantageous for regional project sites
Engine make specified as Kirloskar HA 494, which is known for reliability
Cons:
Lower nominal filling capacity of 6.0 m³
Smaller geometric volume of 11100 L
Drum diameter larger which may affect clearance in restricted spaces
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
The Conmat MR 60C and the Sunbeam 75 both handle regular concrete delivery well, but they suit different site sizes. The Sunbeam 75 carries more concrete per trip and offers flexible drum drive options for longer pours. The Conmat MR 60C stays lighter and more compact, with an engine that is easy to service locally. So match the machine to your work: Sunbeam 75 for bigger loads and flexible drum drive, Conmat MR 60C for regional sites and easy servicing.
Conmat MR 60C Vs Sunbeam 75 Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m, making this concrete mixer efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites.
The Sunbeam 75 Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 7.5 cu m. This transit mixer delivers reliable concrete mixing performance for infrastructure, housing, and medium-scale site operations.
Conmat MR 60C vs Sunbeam 75: Which Transit Mixer to Choose?
The Conmat MR 60C and the Sunbeam 75 both handle regular concrete delivery, but the Sunbeam is built for bigger loads while the Conmat stays lighter and more compact. The Sunbeam 75 offers a choice between Slave Engine and PTO drum drive, giving flexibility in how the drum keeps turning during a pour. The Conmat MR 60C runs a well-known Kirloskar engine and keeps its dimensions smaller, which helps it fit into regional sites with less room to spare.
A drum drive option like PTO can be handy when the truck engine needs rest during a long haul, so ask your dealer how each option works before you decide. See the full transit mixer range and our concrete mixer guide for more help.
Sunbeam 75 Concrete Transit Mixer
Pros:
Higher nominal filling capacity of 7.5 m³
Larger geometric volume of 13060 L
Offers both Slave Engine and PTO options for drum drive
Longer mixer length for potentially greater mixing efficiency
Cons:
Heavier empty weight at 4090 kg
Wider mixer width could pose challenges in narrower sites
Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Truck
Pros:
Lighter empty weight at 3850 kg
Smaller dimensions may be advantageous for regional project sites
Engine make specified as Kirloskar HA 494, which is known for reliability
Cons:
Lower nominal filling capacity of 6.0 m³
Smaller geometric volume of 11100 L
Drum diameter larger which may affect clearance in restricted spaces
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
The Conmat MR 60C and the Sunbeam 75 both handle regular concrete delivery well, but they suit different site sizes. The Sunbeam 75 carries more concrete per trip and offers flexible drum drive options for longer pours. The Conmat MR 60C stays lighter and more compact, with an engine that is easy to service locally. So match the machine to your work: Sunbeam 75 for bigger loads and flexible drum drive, Conmat MR 60C for regional sites and easy servicing.
Conmat MR 60C Vs Sunbeam 75 Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m, making this concrete mixer efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites.
The Sunbeam 75 Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 7.5 cu m. This transit mixer delivers reliable concrete mixing performance for infrastructure, housing, and medium-scale site operations.
27 differ · 14 identical
Key highlights: Conmat MR 60C vs Sunbeam 75 Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 60C
Sunbeam 75
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Slave Engine/PTO Option
Water Line Volume
NA
NA
Shell Thickness
NA
3-4-5-6 mm
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2200 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
5590 mm
6296 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2300 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2615 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Key highlights: Conmat MR 60C vs Sunbeam 75 Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 60C
Sunbeam 75
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Slave Engine/PTO Option
Water Line Volume
NA
NA
Shell Thickness
NA
3-4-5-6 mm
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2200 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
5590 mm
6296 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2300 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2615 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Full specifications: Conmat MR 60C vs Sunbeam 75 Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimension
Conmat MR 60C
Sunbeam 75
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
5200 mm
Mixer Length
5590 mm
6296 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2615 mm
Over Hang
NA
1080 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2300 mm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
3-4-5-6 mm
Mixer Weight (Empty)
3850 kg
4090 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
NA
NA
Performance
Conmat MR 60C
Sunbeam 75
Nomial Filling Capacity
6.0 m³
7.5 m³
Geometric Volume
11100 L
13060 L
Water Line Volume
NA
NA
Filling Ratio
54%
57%
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-14 rpm
Drum Diameter
2267 mm
2200 mm
Water Tank Capacity
450 L
450 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
3.5 bar
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
400 L/min
Water Meter Scale
NA
0-450 L
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Slave Engine/PTO Option
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Engine Make
Kirloskar HA 494
NA
Full specifications: Conmat MR 60C vs Sunbeam 75 Transit Mixer
Questions buyers ask about the Conmat MR 60C vs Sunbeam 75
Ans.
A Slave Engine drives the drum using its own separate motor, while a PTO, or power take-off, drives the drum directly from the truck engine. The Sunbeam 75 offers both options, giving buyers a choice based on how they plan to use the mixer.
Ans.
The Sunbeam 75 carries more concrete per trip, with a 7.5 cu m nominal filling capacity against the Conmat MR 60C's 6.0 cu m. This can reduce the number of trips needed on bigger jobs.
Ans.
The Conmat MR 60C is better suited to narrow regional sites. Its smaller overall dimensions and lighter weight make it easier to place and turn where space is limited.
Ans.
Yes, a wider drum diameter can reduce ground clearance in some cases. The Conmat MR 60C has a larger drum diameter than the Sunbeam 75, which is worth checking against low obstacles on your site.
Ans.
The Conmat MR 60C's Kirloskar HA 494 engine is generally easier to service locally, since Kirloskar has wide dealer and mechanic support across India for spares and repairs.
Conmat MR 60C Vs Sunbeam 75 - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Conmat MR 60C Vs Sunbeam 75 price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
