Conmat MR 60C VS Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer

Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2): the two differ on 30 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Schwing Stetter Transit mixer), Drum Size (6.0 m³ vs 9.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 4850 kg), Capacity (11100 L vs 15850 L). The other 11 specs are the same.

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Price Available Soon^*

Conmat MR 60C

Drum Size

6.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3850 kg
Capacity

11100 L
Filling Ratio

54%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Price Available Soon^*

Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)

Drum Size

9.0 m³
Mixer Weight

4850 kg
Capacity

15850 L
Filling Ratio

57%
Water Tank

650 L
RPM

0-12 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Add a third machine

What's different: Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)

30 specs differ, 11 are identical. The full tables are below.

Spec	Conmat MR 60C	Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Brand	Conmat Transit mixer	Schwing Stetter Transit mixer
Drum Size	6.0 m³	9.0 m³
Mixer Weight	3850 kg	4850 kg
Capacity	11100 L	15850 L
Filling Ratio	54%	57%
Water Tank	450 L	650 L
RPM	0-14 rpm	0-12 rpm
Water Line Volume	NA	10010 L

See all 30 differences ↓

Conmat MR 60C price & full specs →Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) price & full specs →

* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

Conmat MR 60C VS Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Conmat MR 60C

Price Available Soon

Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)

Price Available Soon

Particulars	Conmat MR 60C	Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)

Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 9: 6 m³ against 9 m³ on site

The Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) is built for big-volume delivery, with a 9.0 m³ load, 15,850 L geometric volume, and a 106 HP engine to carry that weight. The Conmat MR 60C carries less at 6.0 m³ with a 70 HP engine, but it is lighter empty at 3,850 kg against 4,850 kg for the AM 9, and shorter in length too.

Water tank size follows the same pattern, with the AM 9 holding 650 L against 450 L on the MR 60C, useful on sites where extra water is needed through the day. An EPC contractor pouring large infrastructure decks will get more done per trip with the AM 9, while a mid-size contractor working smaller regional sites may find the MR 60C easier to place and turn around. See the full concrete mixer guide or the transit mixer range for more options.

Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer

Pros:

Higher nominal filling capacity at 9.0 m³ suitable for large projects
Higher geometric volume of 15850 L allows for more concrete per transit
Larger water tank capacity of 650 L
Higher rotation speed up to 12 rpm for efficient mixing
Higher engine power at 106 HP (79 kW)

Cons:

Heavier empty mixer weight at 4850 kg
Larger dimensions may require more space and could be less maneuverable

Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer

Pros:

Shorter mixer length at 5590 mm could be more maneuverable in constrained spaces
Lighter empty mixer weight at 3850 kg could result in better fuel efficiency
Higher drum rotation speed up to 14 rpm for potentially faster mixing

Cons:

Lower nominal filling capacity at 6.0 m³ which might be less suitable for larger projects
Smaller geometric volume of 11100 L results in less concrete per transit
Smaller water tank capacity at 450 L
Lower engine power at 70 HP (52 kW)

Closing Recommendation

Choose based on the size of your project and how tight your site access is. So match the machine to your work: Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) for high-volume infrastructure pours, Conmat MR 60C for lighter, easier-to-turn work on regional sites.