Conmat MR 60C
VS
Schwing Stetter AM 3
Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 3: the two differ on 30 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Schwing Stetter Transit mixer), Drum Size (6.0 m³ vs 3.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 3100 kg), Capacity (11100 L vs 6350 L). The other 11 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 3
Conmat MR 60C
VS
Schwing Stetter AM 3
Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 3: the two differ on 30 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Schwing Stetter Transit mixer), Drum Size (6.0 m³ vs 3.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 3100 kg), Capacity (11100 L vs 6350 L). The other 11 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Conmat MR 60C
Price Available Soon
Schwing Stetter AM 3
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 3
Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 3: Which One to Buy?
Both these are transit mixers that carry and mix concrete on the way to a site. The Schwing Stetter AM 3 has a smaller 3.0 cubic metre drum and compact dimensions, making it easy to move through narrow city streets and small sites. The Conmat MR 60C carries a bigger 6.0 cubic metre drum, more engine power, and a larger water tank, suited to bigger loads and longer runs.
If you work mostly in tight urban sites where space is limited, the Schwing Stetter AM 3 is the easier machine to manage. If you need to move more concrete per trip on larger regional projects, the Conmat MR 60C gets more done in fewer runs. Browse all concrete mixers, or read our concrete mixer buying guide.
Schwing Stetter AM 3 Transit Mixer
Pros:
Compact dimensions suitable for urban construction sites
Nominal filling capacity of 3.0 m³ ideal for small to medium-sized projects
Drum rotation speed adjustable from 0-12 rpm
Equipped with a 52 HP engine which is suitable for its capacity
Cons:
Lacks information on shell thickness, overhang, and water pump specifications
Relatively smaller water tank capacity of 300 L compared to Conmat MR 60C
Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Higher nominal filling capacity of 6.0 m³ suitable for larger projects
Slightly faster drum rotation speed of 0-14 rpm for efficient mixing
Larger drum diameter for increased mixing effectiveness
Higher engine power at 70 HP, presumably for handling larger loads
Larger water tank capacity of 450 L for better water supply
Cons:
Bigger dimensions may not be ideal for constrained urban spaces
Empty mixer weight is higher, requiring more powerful trucks for transportation
Missing data on mixer weight with concrete, which is vital for load planning
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both these transit mixers do the same job of carrying and mixing concrete, just at different scales. The Schwing Stetter AM 3 is compact and easy to handle, which works well for small and medium jobs inside cities and tight sites. The Conmat MR 60C carries more concrete and more water per trip, which suits bigger, regional projects, though it is heavier and needs a stronger truck to move it. So match the machine to your work: Schwing Stetter AM 3 for compact urban jobs, Conmat MR 60C for larger loads on regional projects.
Conmat MR 60C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 3 Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m, making this concrete mixer efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites.
The Schwing Stetter AM 3 Transit Mixer provides a nominal capacity of 3 cu m. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer offers compact concrete transport, making it ideal for tight urban construction environments.
Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 3: Which One to Buy?
Both these are transit mixers that carry and mix concrete on the way to a site. The Schwing Stetter AM 3 has a smaller 3.0 cubic metre drum and compact dimensions, making it easy to move through narrow city streets and small sites. The Conmat MR 60C carries a bigger 6.0 cubic metre drum, more engine power, and a larger water tank, suited to bigger loads and longer runs.
If you work mostly in tight urban sites where space is limited, the Schwing Stetter AM 3 is the easier machine to manage. If you need to move more concrete per trip on larger regional projects, the Conmat MR 60C gets more done in fewer runs. Browse all concrete mixers, or read our concrete mixer buying guide.
Schwing Stetter AM 3 Transit Mixer
Pros:
Compact dimensions suitable for urban construction sites
Nominal filling capacity of 3.0 m³ ideal for small to medium-sized projects
Drum rotation speed adjustable from 0-12 rpm
Equipped with a 52 HP engine which is suitable for its capacity
Cons:
Lacks information on shell thickness, overhang, and water pump specifications
Relatively smaller water tank capacity of 300 L compared to Conmat MR 60C
Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Higher nominal filling capacity of 6.0 m³ suitable for larger projects
Slightly faster drum rotation speed of 0-14 rpm for efficient mixing
Larger drum diameter for increased mixing effectiveness
Higher engine power at 70 HP, presumably for handling larger loads
Larger water tank capacity of 450 L for better water supply
Cons:
Bigger dimensions may not be ideal for constrained urban spaces
Empty mixer weight is higher, requiring more powerful trucks for transportation
Missing data on mixer weight with concrete, which is vital for load planning
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both these transit mixers do the same job of carrying and mixing concrete, just at different scales. The Schwing Stetter AM 3 is compact and easy to handle, which works well for small and medium jobs inside cities and tight sites. The Conmat MR 60C carries more concrete and more water per trip, which suits bigger, regional projects, though it is heavier and needs a stronger truck to move it. So match the machine to your work: Schwing Stetter AM 3 for compact urban jobs, Conmat MR 60C for larger loads on regional projects.
Conmat MR 60C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 3 Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m, making this concrete mixer efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites.
The Schwing Stetter AM 3 Transit Mixer provides a nominal capacity of 3 cu m. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer offers compact concrete transport, making it ideal for tight urban construction environments.
30 differ · 11 identical
Key highlights: Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 3 Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 3
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
NA
3450 L
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2100 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
2 Axle
Mixer Length
5590 mm
4600 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2300 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2438 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
52 HP (39 kW)
Key highlights: Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 3 Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 3
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
NA
3450 L
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2100 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
2 Axle
Mixer Length
5590 mm
4600 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2300 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2438 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
52 HP (39 kW)
Full specifications: Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 3 Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimension
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 3
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
5590 mm
4600 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2438 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2300 mm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
2 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
3850 kg
3100 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
NA
7200 kg
Performance
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 3
Nomial Filling Capacity
6.0 m³
3.0 m³
Geometric Volume
11100 L
6350 L
Water Line Volume
NA
3450 L
Filling Ratio
54%
47%
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Drum Diameter
2267 mm
2100 mm
Water Tank Capacity
450 L
300 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
NA
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
52 HP (39 kW)
Engine Make
Kirloskar HA 494
NA
Full specifications: Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 3 Transit Mixer
Questions buyers ask about the Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 3
Ans.
The Conmat MR 60C carries more concrete, with a 6.0 cubic metre drum against the Schwing Stetter AM 3's 3.0 cubic metre drum. This lets it deliver double the load in one trip.
Ans.
The Conmat MR 60C spins slightly faster, with a drum rotation range of 0 to 14 rpm against the Schwing Stetter AM 3's 0 to 12 rpm. Faster rotation helps keep the concrete mixed evenly during transport.
Ans.
Yes, the Conmat MR 60C is heavier even when empty, so it needs a more powerful truck to carry and move it. This is the trade-off for its larger drum and bigger water tank.
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 3 is easier to drive in city traffic because of its more compact dimensions. Its smaller size also makes it simpler to park and turn on narrow site roads.
Ans.
The Conmat MR 60C holds more water, with a 450 litre tank against the Schwing Stetter AM 3's 300 litre tank. A bigger tank means fewer stops to refill on longer jobs.
Conmat MR 60C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 3 - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Conmat MR 60C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 3 price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
