Conmat MR 60C
VS
Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)
Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2): the two differ on 24 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Schwing Stetter Transit mixer), Drum Size (6.0 m³ vs 7.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 3900 kg), Capacity (11100 L vs 12750 L). The other 17 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)
Conmat MR 60C
VS
Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)
Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2): the two differ on 24 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Schwing Stetter Transit mixer), Drum Size (6.0 m³ vs 7.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 3900 kg), Capacity (11100 L vs 12750 L). The other 17 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Conmat MR 60C
Price Available Soon
Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)
Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2): Which Transit Mixer to Choose?
The Conmat MR 60C and the Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) both run on a 3-axle truck and use a similar 70 HP engine, so the real difference between them shows up in drum size and mixing speed, not raw power. The Conmat carries a bit less concrete per trip but turns its drum faster, which can help keep the mix consistent on the way to the site. The Schwing Stetter carries more concrete and has a slightly wider drum, useful when each trip needs to count.
Since both machines share a similar engine class, your choice often comes down to how your sites are set up and how much concrete you need per load. Look through the full transit mixer range and read our concrete mixer buying guide to compare drum sizes across brands before you decide.
Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites
Reasonable concrete nominal filling capacity of 6.0 m³
Geometric volume of 11100 L suggests a good drum size
Rotation speed up to 14 rpm can result in better mixing
Powered by a Kirloskar HA 494 with 70 HP which offers reliable performance
Cons:
Smaller drum diameter compared to Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)
No water line volume specified to gauge maximum efficient water level
Certain mixer details like Shell Thickness, Overhang, and Water Pump specs are not available
Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixer
Pros:
Offers a higher nominal capacity of 7 cu m for larger concrete transportation jobs
Larger geometric volume of 12750 L indicates a more spacious drum
Well-defined water line volume at 8250 L which is beneficial for optimal mixing preparation
Has a slightly bigger drum diameter of 2300 mm
Cons:
The rotation speed of 0-12 rpm is slightly less than Conmat MR 60C which may affect mixing performance
Weighs slightly more empty at 3900 kg which could have a minor impact on fuel efficiency
Engine make is not specified which could be important for some buyers
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
The Conmat MR 60C and the Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) both run on a similar engine and truck class, so the choice comes down to drum details. The Schwing Stetter AM 7 carries a bit more concrete and has a wider drum for larger loads. The Conmat MR 60C turns its drum faster and uses a well-known Kirloskar engine, which can help with servicing later. So match the machine to your work: Schwing Stetter AM 7 for slightly bigger loads, Conmat MR 60C for faster mixing and easy engine service.
Conmat MR 60C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m, making this concrete mixer efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites.
The Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixer delivers a nominal capacity of 7 cu m. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer meets diverse jobsite concrete needs with efficient throughput.
Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2): Which Transit Mixer to Choose?
The Conmat MR 60C and the Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) both run on a 3-axle truck and use a similar 70 HP engine, so the real difference between them shows up in drum size and mixing speed, not raw power. The Conmat carries a bit less concrete per trip but turns its drum faster, which can help keep the mix consistent on the way to the site. The Schwing Stetter carries more concrete and has a slightly wider drum, useful when each trip needs to count.
Since both machines share a similar engine class, your choice often comes down to how your sites are set up and how much concrete you need per load. Look through the full transit mixer range and read our concrete mixer buying guide to compare drum sizes across brands before you decide.
Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites
Reasonable concrete nominal filling capacity of 6.0 m³
Geometric volume of 11100 L suggests a good drum size
Rotation speed up to 14 rpm can result in better mixing
Powered by a Kirloskar HA 494 with 70 HP which offers reliable performance
Cons:
Smaller drum diameter compared to Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)
No water line volume specified to gauge maximum efficient water level
Certain mixer details like Shell Thickness, Overhang, and Water Pump specs are not available
Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixer
Pros:
Offers a higher nominal capacity of 7 cu m for larger concrete transportation jobs
Larger geometric volume of 12750 L indicates a more spacious drum
Well-defined water line volume at 8250 L which is beneficial for optimal mixing preparation
Has a slightly bigger drum diameter of 2300 mm
Cons:
The rotation speed of 0-12 rpm is slightly less than Conmat MR 60C which may affect mixing performance
Weighs slightly more empty at 3900 kg which could have a minor impact on fuel efficiency
Engine make is not specified which could be important for some buyers
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
The Conmat MR 60C and the Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) both run on a similar engine and truck class, so the choice comes down to drum details. The Schwing Stetter AM 7 carries a bit more concrete and has a wider drum for larger loads. The Conmat MR 60C turns its drum faster and uses a well-known Kirloskar engine, which can help with servicing later. So match the machine to your work: Schwing Stetter AM 7 for slightly bigger loads, Conmat MR 60C for faster mixing and easy engine service.
Conmat MR 60C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m, making this concrete mixer efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites.
The Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixer delivers a nominal capacity of 7 cu m. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer meets diverse jobsite concrete needs with efficient throughput.
24 differ · 17 identical
Key highlights: Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
NA
8250 L
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2300 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
5590 mm
6250 mm / 6400 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2400 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2650 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Key highlights: Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
NA
8250 L
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2300 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
5590 mm
6250 mm / 6400 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2400 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2650 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Full specifications: Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimension
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
5590 mm
6250 mm / 6400 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2650 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2400 mm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
3850 kg
3900 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
NA
16800 kg
Performance
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)
Nomial Filling Capacity
6.0 m³
7.0 m³
Geometric Volume
11100 L
12750 L
Water Line Volume
NA
8250 L
Filling Ratio
54%
55%
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Drum Diameter
2267 mm
2300 mm
Water Tank Capacity
450 L
450 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
NA
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Engine Make
Kirloskar HA 494
NA
Full specifications: Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) Transit Mixer
Questions buyers ask about the Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2)
Ans.
Yes, both run on a similar 70 HP engine, so engine power is not the main difference between them. The bigger differences show up in drum capacity, rotation speed and drum diameter instead.
Ans.
The Conmat MR 60C turns its drum faster, at up to 14 rpm against the Schwing Stetter AM 7's 0-12 rpm. A faster rotation can help keep the concrete mix more even during the trip to site.
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 7 has a wider drum at 2300 mm. A wider drum can carry a slightly larger load and may empty out a little faster during a pour.
Ans.
It can matter for service and spares. The Conmat MR 60C lists its engine as Kirloskar, a well-known name for parts and local service, while the Schwing Stetter AM 7's engine make is not listed on the spec sheet here.
Ans.
Both suit regional and city sites well, since they run on the same 3-axle truck class. The Conmat MR 60C is built with regional project sites in mind, while the Schwing Stetter AM 7 works across a wider range of job types.
Conmat MR 60C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Conmat MR 60C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 7 (C2) price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
