Conmat MR 60C VS Putzmeister P7+ Transit Mixer

Conmat MR 60C vs Putzmeister P7+: the two differ on 26 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Putzmeister Transit mixer), Drum Size (6.0 m³ vs 7.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 3750 kg), Capacity (11100 L vs 12730 L). The other 15 specs are the same.

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Price Available Soon^*

Conmat MR 60C

Drum Size

6.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3850 kg
Capacity

11100 L
Filling Ratio

54%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Price Available Soon^*

Putzmeister P7+

Drum Size

7.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3750 kg
Capacity

12730 L
Filling Ratio

55.10%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Add a third machine

What's different: Conmat MR 60C vs Putzmeister P7+

26 specs differ, 15 are identical. The full tables are below.

Spec	Conmat MR 60C	Putzmeister P7+
Brand	Conmat Transit mixer	Putzmeister Transit mixer
Drum Size	6.0 m³	7.0 m³
Mixer Weight	3850 kg	3750 kg
Capacity	11100 L	12730 L
Filling Ratio	54%	55.10%
Drum Drive	P.T.O. /Slave Engine	Slave Engine
Water Line Volume	NA	8260 L
Drum diameter	2267 mm	2260 mm

See all 26 differences ↓

Conmat MR 60C price & full specs →Putzmeister P7+ price & full specs →

* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

Conmat MR 60C VS Putzmeister P7+ Transit Mixer

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Conmat MR 60C

Price Available Soon

Putzmeister P7+

Price Available Soon

Particulars	Conmat MR 60C	Putzmeister P7+

Conmat MR 60C vs Putzmeister P7+: 6 m³ or 7 m³ for your route

The step up from the Conmat MR 60C to the Putzmeister P7+ is mainly about load size. The MR 60C carries 6.0 m³ with 11,100 L geometric volume, while the P7+ carries 7.0 m³ with 12,730 L geometric volume, meaning fewer trips for the same total pour. The MR 60C also gives you a choice between P.T.O. and slave engine drum drive, while the P7+ runs only on a dedicated slave engine.

Length matters too: the P7+ is longer at 6,385 mm, which can make it slower to turn on narrow site roads, while the shorter MR 60C moves easier through tight gates and lanes. A contractor moving larger daily volumes on open highways may prefer the P7+ for fewer runs, while an owner-operator working congested city sites may find the MR 60C easier to handle. Check specs in the concrete mixer guide or browse the full transit mixer range.

Putzmeister P7+ Transit Mixer

Pros:

Higher nominal filling capacity of 7.0 m³
Larger geometric volume of 12730 L
Exclusive slave engine for drum drive
Engine power of 69 HP

Cons:

Slightly heavier empty mixer weight of 3750 kg
Larger mixer length of 6385 mm may affect maneuverability

Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer

Pros:

Equipped with a Kirloskar HA 494 engine
Offers dual options for drum drive: P.T.O./Slave Engine
Engine power of 70 HP, slightly higher than competitor

Cons:

Lower nominal filling capacity of 6.0 m³
Smaller geometric volume of 11100 L

Closing Recommendation

Pick based on load size and site access, not on brand name alone. So match the machine to your work: Putzmeister P7+ for bigger loads on open highway routes, Conmat MR 60C for tighter city sites and flexible drum drive needs.