Conmat MR 60C
VS
Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C)
Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C): the two differ on 30 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Schwing Stetter Transit mixer), Drum Size (6.0 m³ vs 12.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 5550 kg), Capacity (11100 L vs 20690 L). The other 11 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C)
Conmat MR 60C
VS
Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C)
Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C): the two differ on 30 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Schwing Stetter Transit mixer), Drum Size (6.0 m³ vs 12.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 5550 kg), Capacity (11100 L vs 20690 L). The other 11 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Conmat MR 60C
Price Available Soon
Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C)
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C)
Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing AM 12 C: Which Mixer Fits?
The Conmat MR 60C is a 6 cubic metre mixer suited to small and mid-size project sites. The Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) is a much bigger 12 cubic metre mixer, built for mega-construction projects that need very high concrete volumes.
Pick the Conmat MR 60C for regular, steady work on smaller sites. Pick the Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) when your project scale calls for moving large batches of concrete, and you can support the bigger truck it needs. Browse the full range of transit mixers or read the concrete mixer guide to compare mixer sizes.
Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Suitable for regional project sites with its 6.0 m³ nominal filling capacity
Capable of 0-14 rpm for efficient mixing
Equipped with a 70 HP Kirloskar HA 494 engine
Cons:
Smaller geometric volume of 11100 L compared to its counterpart
Less water tank capacity at 450 L
Limited information on engine make for a more detailed comparison
Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) Transit Mixer
Pros:
Built for maximum volume transport with 12.0 m³ nominal filling capacity
Larger geometric volume of 20690 L supports mega-construction projects
Greater water tank capacity of 600 L for better on-site efficiency
Cons:
Heavier empty mixer weight at 5550 kg could imply higher fuel consumption
Rotates at a slower pace (0-12 rpm), which may affect mixing times
Requires a 4 Axle truck, which may increase operation costs
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Think about project scale first. The Conmat MR 60C suits smaller, regional sites, since it is light and easy to manage day to day. The Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) suits mega and large-scale projects, since it moves far more concrete per trip on a bigger truck. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 60C for smaller regional sites, Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) for mega, high-volume projects.
Conmat MR 60C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m, making this concrete mixer efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites.
The Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) Transit Mixer delivers a nominal capacity of 12 cu m. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer is built for maximum volume transport in mega-construction projects.
Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing AM 12 C: Which Mixer Fits?
The Conmat MR 60C is a 6 cubic metre mixer suited to small and mid-size project sites. The Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) is a much bigger 12 cubic metre mixer, built for mega-construction projects that need very high concrete volumes.
Pick the Conmat MR 60C for regular, steady work on smaller sites. Pick the Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) when your project scale calls for moving large batches of concrete, and you can support the bigger truck it needs. Browse the full range of transit mixers or read the concrete mixer guide to compare mixer sizes.
Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Suitable for regional project sites with its 6.0 m³ nominal filling capacity
Capable of 0-14 rpm for efficient mixing
Equipped with a 70 HP Kirloskar HA 494 engine
Cons:
Smaller geometric volume of 11100 L compared to its counterpart
Less water tank capacity at 450 L
Limited information on engine make for a more detailed comparison
Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) Transit Mixer
Pros:
Built for maximum volume transport with 12.0 m³ nominal filling capacity
Larger geometric volume of 20690 L supports mega-construction projects
Greater water tank capacity of 600 L for better on-site efficiency
Cons:
Heavier empty mixer weight at 5550 kg could imply higher fuel consumption
Rotates at a slower pace (0-12 rpm), which may affect mixing times
Requires a 4 Axle truck, which may increase operation costs
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Think about project scale first. The Conmat MR 60C suits smaller, regional sites, since it is light and easy to manage day to day. The Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) suits mega and large-scale projects, since it moves far more concrete per trip on a bigger truck. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 60C for smaller regional sites, Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) for mega, high-volume projects.
Conmat MR 60C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m, making this concrete mixer efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites.
The Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) Transit Mixer delivers a nominal capacity of 12 cu m. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer is built for maximum volume transport in mega-construction projects.
30 differ · 11 identical
Key highlights: Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C)
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
NA
13150 L
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2300 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
4 Axle
Mixer Length
5590 mm
8565 mm / 9260 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2842 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
106 HP (79 kW)
Key highlights: Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C)
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
NA
13150 L
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2300 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
4 Axle
Mixer Length
5590 mm
8565 mm / 9260 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2842 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
106 HP (79 kW)
Full specifications: Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimension
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C)
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
5590 mm
8565 mm / 9260 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2842 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
4 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
3850 kg
5550 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
NA
28800 kg
Performance
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C)
Nomial Filling Capacity
6.0 m³
12.0 m³
Geometric Volume
11100 L
20690 L
Water Line Volume
NA
13150 L
Filling Ratio
54%
79%
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Drum Diameter
2267 mm
2300 mm
Water Tank Capacity
450 L
600 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
NA
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
106 HP (79 kW)
Engine Make
Kirloskar HA 494
NA
Full specifications: Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) Transit Mixer
Questions buyers ask about the Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C)
Ans.
The main difference is size. The Conmat MR 60C carries 6 cubic metres of concrete. The Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) carries 12 cubic metres, double the volume, and needs a bigger truck to carry it.
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) suits mega or large-scale projects. Its bigger drum moves far more concrete per trip, which saves time on very high-volume pours.
Ans.
The Conmat MR 60C suits smaller, regional project sites. It is easier to manage day to day and does not need the bigger truck that the Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) requires.
Ans.
The Conmat MR 60C turns the drum faster, at up to 14 rotations a minute against 12 on the Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C). This suits steady, standard mixing on smaller loads.
Ans.
Yes. The Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) needs a 4-axle truck to carry its bigger, heavier drum. The Conmat MR 60C runs on a lighter truck setup, which is easier for most fleets to manage.
Conmat MR 60C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Conmat MR 60C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 12 (C) price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
